The gazillionith July Stundie Nom thread

Agatha said:
Darn, Erock, I was just about to nominate that! However, FF88 is the gift that keeps on giving, and from the same post:
FatFreddy88 said:
My not having access to classified info doesn't mean it couldn't have happened. The government can manipulate any data it wants to so any records saying such-and-such a thing happened cannot be used as proof of anything.
Click to expand...
Governments classify the information to keep it secret, but they manipulate the information so that no secrets would be revealed even when the documents are released. How sneaky is that, huh? It's almost as if they don't need to classify anything - and yet they still do.
Click to expand...
FF88 fantasizes that NASA has "real" radiation data which it keeps secret, and only people with "high-level security clearances" can see it. Of course, most people designing, building, and operating commercial and civil spacecraft do not have security clearances, and use the "public" data. If rocky's fantasy was correct, most of our weather, TV, etc. satellites would die agonizing premature deaths, and the insurers Would Not Be Amused.

Just another example of rocky/FF88/DavidC/etc.'s absolute ignorance of the subject.
 
000063 said:
Not sure if serious, but you see that little arrow next to the username? Links back to the original comment. It's fairly non-intuitive. I found out when I randomly clicked on one one day out of curiousity, after almost a decade of seeing them on various forums.
Click to expand...

Cl1mh4224rd said:
Click on the [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/helloworld2/buttons/viewpost.gif[/qimg] next to Dogzilla's name.
Click to expand...

I could
A) claim I did not know that
B) claim its a conspiracy to destroy my credibility and that since I did not see those arrows until just now that you are all against me and that they are a recent addition to the forum and file a court proceeding accusing JREF of trying to show me as insane
C) say I was kdding around and that a CTist would say something like that because you did not include a url in the body of your post
D) man up and admit I did know it and missed it.



"D":blush:
 
You forgot E) Conveniently misunderstand the post, and ask a question based on a strawman that you don't actually want to hear the answer to, EG: "I never said that the little arrow wasn't a link!" If you're good, like certain terrorist-supporting communists on this forum, you can add even more qualifiers and BS. "Why do you think that I said that the little arrow wasn't a link?"

I once saw her respond to a question, after repeatedly ignoring it, in a sentence that had three separate qualifiers, and it didn't actually answer the question I asked in any way.
 
The only people who know the secret are the secret people. I know the secret people know the secret because...?
FatFreddy88 said:
You people are putting forth the idea that I should study more of the official version of the nature and levels of space radiation before I talk about it. The theory is that the info you say I should study is bogus. There is alternative info that contradicts the official data. The only people who can be sure of the true nature and levels of space radiation are people with high security clearances. The rest of us have no way of knowing what the levels are.

The government lies about so many other things, so why should we just believe their info on space radiation? I have a link to some info on lies by the US government but I forbidden to link directly to it so click on this link and then click on the bottom link.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8033032&postcount=1

The anomalies in the footage and still pictures have already proven the hoax. The radiation issue isn't about whether they faked it. It's about why they faked it.
Click to expand...
 
Border Reiver said:
Horatius, that Kozmik dude is a special kind of crazy who, in his own words doesn't need to explain his ideas coherently.
Click to expand...



Well, in his defense, when he does try to explain them coherently, we get things like this:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15277125&postcount=573


By virtue of being the head of government of a superpower (currently the only superpower in the world), Barack Obama is, perhaps, the most powerful person on earth. The September 11, 2001 attacks indicate that the head of government of a superpower is, perhaps, not the most powerful person on earth. If Barack Obama is not the most powerful person on earth than someone else, perhaps, is the most powerful person on earth. If someone else is the most powerful person on earth than there is, perhaps, an entity that is above the 192 governments. If there is an entity that is above the 192 governments then that entity would be a hyperpower.
Click to expand...
 
Another non-conspiracy related one just for entertainment value. I'm doing this in the sure knowledge that Travis would never include it in the finals, and if he did it wouldn't have a hope of winning :rolleyes:.

PeaceCrusader is desperate for World War III to start today, because according to a prophecy it's supposed to happen before the Olympics and on a Wednesday.

PeaceCrusader said:
[...]I know that a fleet of 30 vessels have arrived at Fiery Cross Reef (Yongshu Reef), about 500 km from Palawan province of the Philippines.

Will this fleet of 550 fishermen from Hainan province trigger the prophesied nuclear World War III?
Click to expand...

Let me see. (Checks history book for a list of world wars started by a bunch of mardy fishermen.) I'm going with "no".

Dave
 
theres a mathematician at work on Ickes freeman forums
If we start with £87 in crisp £5 notes and someone wants to borrow £51, the total money in circulation becomes £138. But there is still only £87 in used tenners. The rest is debt. If one person had control of the money and engineered the creation of the debt, they would have £138 in buying power.
Click to expand...
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1060946765&postcount=45

I also like the last line
These ideas have only just occurred to me. Not being interested in such things, I don't give them much thought.
Click to expand...
Obviously.
 
Science? We don't need no stinking science...

ianw at DIF thinks all those expert nazi rocket scientists are just a cunning smoke screen for, erm, expert rocket science...


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1060946492&postcount=2251

Investigating the formation of the spoof as everything to do with it.
Apologists want to look at the pixels, thats right remastered pixels and good scientific theory.
The fascists are not interested in moon pixels they want the world not some unobtainable sand mine in your sea of tranquillity.
Trying to look at the people in the shadows and what thay are up to gives a truer picture of LEO exploitation.
Click to expand...

(my emphasis)
 
ConspiracyKiller said:
My point is that the Taliban are STRONGER than they were before the US invaded and the Taliban now control more of Afghanistan than they did before the US invaded despite that the stated goal for the US military operations in Afghanistan was, (since the May 2001 plan), TO OUST THE TALIBAN GOVERNMENT.

It was even widely reported by a dozen news reports from around the world that back in JUNE 2001 the US told other countries it was going to begin military operations in OCTOBER 2001 to eliminate the Taliban.

But now US government officials are saying the Taliban are NOT the enemy. So if the Taliban are not the enemy of the US why did the US want to oust the Taliban BEFORE 9/11?
Click to expand...
So the Taliban is stronger and controls more territory now than when they were the GOVERNMENT of Afghanistan and owned the entire county?:confused:
 
A double whammy from Robert Prey

Robert Prey said:
An alleged proof of a single bullet theory has no relation to the fatal shot that blasted the President's head leaving a large blow-out in the back of his head as affirmed by 40 plus onthescene medical witnesses. .
Click to expand...

Robert Prey said:
The list is not of forty medical witnesses but merely 40 witnesses. The word "medical" is your interpolation.
Click to expand...

Then:

Robert Prey said:
It's a mixed list. There are many more medical witnesses not on this list. Obviously. I previously attempted to post a more complete list but the moderator deleted it.
Click to expand...


Robert Prey said:
Baloney. No one on this board has presented a more complete, accurate compilation of medical witnesses. Your alleged debunking has been thoroughly debunked and you know it.
Click to expand...

Yep, his own claim is "Baloney".
 
This may be a sensitive subject, but another non-CT piece of twisted logic needs recognising. Meadmaker is arguing that circumcision of infants has no effect on their subsequent choice of whether or not to be circumcised:

Meadmaker said:
If there were exactly two states of being, circumcised and uncircumcised, then the "choice" argument would be legitimate.
Click to expand...

Because there are so many possibilities in between.

Dave
 
Come on, Dave, I thought the next bit was better!

Meadmaker said:
Let us suppose that our 18 year old uncircumcised male decides to remain uncircumcised, but that at age 25 he decides he made a bad choice. He can undo that choice by becoming circumcised, right? Of course not. What he wants is to be a 19 year old circumcised male, and he can't do that.
Click to expand...


Basically, some people might wish, in adolescence, that they'd been circumcised as babies, but they can't choose that at age 18, they can only choose to become circumcised at the age of 18.

So these nasty people who are against cutting bits off babies are denying them the choice of growing up circumcised.

I think my brain just seeped out of my ears....

Rolfe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom