The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hans said:
Is this thread of 'especially's' getting to old, long and difficult to read? Should we create a new thread directly involved with Rob Menard's brand of nonsense?
Click to expand...


Good idea. Menard's brand is Canadian (albeit just as unfounded, ridiculous and nonsensical as Especially's British version).
 
LashL said:
Good idea. Menard's brand is Canadian (albeit just as unfounded, ridiculous and nonsensical as Especially's British version).
Click to expand...
.
Except that Rob seems to have abandoned the field...
.
 
That's okay. If he chooses not to engage in a new thread created for his particular brand of nonsense, it will become quite plain and obvious why. The existing thread does not depend on or require his participation, after all.
 
LashL said:
If he chooses not to engage in a new thread created for his particular brand of nonsense, it will become quite plain and obvious why.
Click to expand...
.
I submit that it already is plain and obvious why...
.
 
Mojo said:
$8 million? I'm regularly offered more than that by gentlemen from Nigeria.
Click to expand...

Yeah, i just have to send $2500 dollars more for legal and storage fees and twenty million dollars in rare furs will be mine.
 
It might be good to split the thread off from where Rob's stuff really takes over, if someone could identify where that is and ask a mod to do it.

Rolfe.
 
Well, it's been wandering off into non-UK matters for quite some time - for example around page 20 Especially forgot he was supposed to be English and started going on about the US constitution and federal income tax not having been voted for by Congress, and Menard originally showed up in October.
 
Isn't today the blessed day we have awaited for so long: The unsuspension of Especially? If he returns to us with his wisdom and expertise, how about we use that as a trigger for a thread split?
 
The vibrations of the fringe make me think that 'especially' will come up with something so densely stupid that it will sink to the centre of the Earth.
 
gtm said:
I've no doubt there are umpteen FMOTL legal 'theoreticians' researching this troubling scenario. My guess is the answer must lie with Magna Carta (it always does doesn't it?)
Click to expand...


I refer you to R v. Haddock (1935) Herbert's Misleading Cases 101, in which Lugg J. held that:
The appellant has done this country an ill service in raising this point, for but for his rash act generations of English orators might have continued in the fond belief that Magna Carta was still the abiding bulwark of our liberties, and for that act I shall order him to pay a further fine of five pounds. But it is no part of my duties to conceal the truth, and I am reluctantly compelled to declare that Magna Carta is no longer the law.
Click to expand...
 
Mojo said:
$8 million? I'm regularly offered more than that by gentlemen from Nigeria.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but they're usually related to Nigerian royalty somehow, so they're obviously on the up-and-up, right?

Hmmm...maybe that's Menard's best bet to expand his business. Except there isn't any Canadian royalty. Maybe he could name drop Gretzky or Bobby Orr or something.
 
jsfisher said:
Isn't today the blessed day we have awaited for so long: The unsuspension of Especially? If he returns to us with his wisdom and expertise, how about we use that as a trigger for a thread split?
Click to expand...
I hope he returns to the Copernicus thread.
 
Mojo said:
I refer you to R v. Haddock (1935) Herbert's Misleading Cases 101, in which Lugg J. held that:
Click to expand...

Aaaaaah AP Herbert. The one & only great english legal humorist. He'd have loved this FMOTL guff. Just up his street in it's perversity. What I really want to see is a case report with a hardcore FMOTL'er up against a panel of Court of Appeal Lord Justices.

This is the best alternative I can find - HM AG v Ebert

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku...dmin/2000/286.html&query=Ebert&method=boolean

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku...dmin/2001/695.html&query=Ebert&method=boolean
 
Last edited:
Mojo said:
That seems to be in some ways the opposite of FOTL, though - Mr Ebert has been declared a vexatious litigant.
Click to expand...


I have to confess I have slight personal interest in the Ebert case as my father is good mates with LJ Laws! (he loves his cats)

The vexacious litigant (s42 of the Supreme court Act 1981) cause is a wonderful source of legal moonbattery:-


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku.../2001/254.html&query=vexatious&method=boolean


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku.../1998/408.html&query=vexatious&method=boolean


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku...2005/1254.html&query=vexatious&method=boolean

Mr Ebert again (you can't keep a 'good' man down)

& a mad veterinary surgeon (this is one of my favourite judgements ever)

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2004/4.html
 
Oh, Maurice Kirk! I used to get all his stuff by email because some idiot gave him my email address - fortunately he doesn't know my new one.

Kirk the flying vet. One of the great moonbats of all time.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/Default.aspx

You totally have to read some of his rants against the South Wales police and the RCVS. He's a classic.

Rolfe.
 
Rolfe said:
Oh, Maurice Kirk! I used to get all his stuff by email because some idiot gave him my email address - fortunately he doesn't know my new one.

Kirk the flying vet. One of the great moonbats of all time.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/Default.aspx

You totally have to read some of his rants against the South Wales police and the RCVS. He's a classic.

Rolfe.
Click to expand...



Wow. Just the links text are an insight:

# Around the World Solo Flight
# Arrested
# Caswell Clinic
# Hunger Strike
# Jail
# Kirstie
# London to Sydney Air Race
# Machine Gun
Click to expand...
 
gtm said:
I have to confess I have slight personal interest in the Ebert case as my father is good mates with LJ Laws! (he loves his cats)

The vexacious litigant (s42 of the Supreme court Act 1981) cause is a wonderful source of legal moonbattery:-


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku.../2001/254.html&query=vexatious&method=boolean


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku.../1998/408.html&query=vexatious&method=boolean


http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/marku...2005/1254.html&query=vexatious&method=boolean

Mr Ebert again (you can't keep a 'good' man down)

& a mad veterinary surgeon (this is one of my favourite judgements ever)

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2004/4.html
Click to expand...

Rather colourful insults in the UK:

The last assault conviction was the result of an appearance by Mr Kirk in Bristol Magistrates' Court in January 2000. After the magistrate had retired, Mr Kirk is alleged to have gone up to Ms Clare Brown, the CPS representative in court, and said to her in a threatening manner: "If you don't stop being obstructive I will turn you upside down and use you like a moneybox". Ms Brown was alarmed and Mr Kirk was charged under section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986. He was convicted six months later and fined £300. His appeal to the Crown Court was dismissed in January 2002, shortly before his appearance before the Disciplinary Committee. He told the Committee that he was contemplating an application for judicial review.
 
He's a full-blown CTer. If I remember the demented rants correctly (they don't sem to be on the web site as they used to be) it's all a masonic conspiracy against him by the South Wales police, and the RCVS struck him off in order to deprive him of an income so he couldn't pursue his actions against them. Or something like that. I may still have some of his emails, if they missed the delete button.

Rolfe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom