The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

'Jew hating' (as a result of loving my civilization) I reserve indeed for this forum.

Oh and I would be very disappointed if I could convince you people (at this stage) of my ideas and as such be robbed of an arena I can use to sharpen my wit.

Carry on, keep attacking me. You are doing fine.

There's a difference between attacking and telling it like it is. The world is FULL of ideologues and extremists who think they are right and everybody else is wrong. It serves no purpose to "attack you"; your irrelevance is punishment enough.
 
Typical for your shoddy work and lack of basic research. None of the 19 were cavemen from Afghanistan.

Nor, indeed, is there any evidence that any of them ever saw the inside of a cave. But the question, "How could nineteen fairly well-educated, middle class, fit and healthy young men with combat training defeat lax and out-of-date airline security procedures and then evade a run-down post-Cold War fighter force that had never seriously considered the possibility of having to defend against this sort of attack?" just doesn't make a good enough sound bite to fool the gullible, does it?

Dave
 
Typical for your shoddy work and lack of basic research. None of the 19 were cavemen from Afghanistan. Some very basic work which obviously can't be bothered with would have cleared up your error for you. Typical of your kind.

The Afghanistan/cave men picture was related to CIA asset bin Laden, after the fact, supposedly on the run for the US army, but in reality enjoying his old age in the grave. So you have a partial but irrelevant point here.
 
The Afghanistan/cave men picture was related to CIA asset bin Laden, after the fact, supposedly on the run for the US army, but in reality enjoying his old age in the grave. So you have a partial but irrelevant point here.

You just said a whole lot of nothing.

...and it's entirely relevant to your point. You said 19 Afghani cavemen [blah, blah]...and he told you why you were wrong...you got everything wrong about that statement and now you're trying to handwave it away.

Typical.
 
But the question, "How could nineteen fairly well-educated, middle class, fit and healthy young men with combat training defeat lax and out-of-date airline security procedures and then evade a run-down post-Cold War fighter force that had never seriously considered the possibility of having to defend against this sort of attack?" just doesn't make a good enough sound bite to fool the gullible, does it?

Yea, that definitely doesn't roll off the tongue as nicely as "INSIDE JOB!!111!!!11!!!!11"
 
You just said a whole lot of nothing.

...and it's entirely relevant to your point. You said 19 Afghani cavemen [blah, blah]...and he told you why you were wrong...you got everything wrong about that statement and now you're trying to handwave it away.

Typical.

If you read my blog you will see immediately that I know very well that Atta and other 'hijackers' studied in Germany.

http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

Afghani cave men refears to these (fake) 'bin Laden videos', and pictures from 'Al Qaida' training sessions in Afghanistan.

But I am happy for you that you could score a rare point. Congratulations.
 
Why do you need a blog? To let the world know about what "really happened on 9/11"?

Are there not enough squabbling idiots like Richard Gage and Alex Jones infesting the web?
 
Why do you need a blog? To let the world know about what "really happened on 9/11"?

Are there not enough squabbling idiots like Richard Gage and Alex Jones infesting the web?

To fight the political objectives behind the 9/11 attacks: the Sovietization of America and in it's wake, Europe.
 
Last edited:
To fight the political objectives behind the 9/11 attacks: the Sovietization of America and in it's wake, Europe.

Sovietization didn't work in the USSR (now defunct), so why would it happen/work anywhere else apart, perhaps, from a country like N Korea (even China has moved on from the Mao era)?
 
If you read my blog...[snip]
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/
[snip]

That blog is a joke. Not a single fact anywhere. Maybe one of these days when I have nothing but free time on my hands, I'll take the time to debunk the thing word by word...

Anyway, some things that caught my eye as blatantly false:

This little animation of yours is funny:
pullupgif.gif

What you have that plane doing is impossible. So, no, "this animation could NOT explain the many eye-witness accounts that a plane did indeed approach the Pentagon".


This image of the approach angle of 175 is completely wrong:
southtowerpath.jpg



This statement is completely ficition as well:
"In this dutch video it is shown how thermite is routinely used to bring down buildings." (in regards to your link to this video: http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=4cg2y3RqbO8).

So far, I see nothing but made up junk, imaginary evidence, impossible physics, and blatant lies. You may as well put "I Hate Jews" scrolling across the top of your blog...
 
OMG, 9/11 Investigator's blog is a gold mine of hilarious stuff:

The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on October 31, 1999.

No evidence for that I guess! :rolleyes:

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the Israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demolition experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently.

:dl:

Note: I am not claiming that 9/11 is solved. Of this however we can be certain: WTC controlled demolition, Israelis carried out the operation, no Arab hijackers, mastermind Zakheim, motive PNAC & Clean Break and remote control.

:dl: OMG!

Many people realize that the official explanation of the 9/11 events is implausible. Prof. David Ray Griffin for instance has written several books detailing what is implausible about the official story, hereafter dubbed as the Arab Conspiracy Theory (ACT). The aim of this blog will be to present a competing conspiracy theory, dubbed as the Israeli Conspiracy Theory (ICT) to see who might win this competition.

Bells should be ringing by now!
 
Last edited:
Are you serious right now? Do hundreds of news video showing the plane hitting the building not completely destroy that "theory"? What dream world are you living in? This only confirms my belief that twoofers are straight up delusional
 
Are you serious right now? Do hundreds of news video showing the plane hitting the building not completely destroy that "theory"? What dream world are you living in? This only confirms my belief that twoofers are straight up delusional

In this case we're dealing with a neo-Nazi, holocaust denying twoofer, so the delusion goes deeper than you might think.
 

Back
Top Bottom