The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

So you are basically saying that 19 bearded caveman from Afghanistan were able to carry out the 9/11 conspiracy but somehow the CIA/Mossad was not.

They were not cavemen. They may or may not have been bearded, but they were not cavemen.

And the objection is not that the CIA and Mossad couldn't have done it. It's that they didn't.

To fight the political objectives behind the 9/11 attacks: the Sovietization of America and in it's wake, Europe.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but America is never going to be "Sovietized". There are too many gun-toting hypercapitalist rednecks in the South.

...And, truth be told, in most of the other regions as well.

EDIT: Waitaminute.

To fight the political objectives behind the 9/11 attacks: the Sovietization of America and in it's wake, Europe.

You are actually saying - like, you're serious about this - that you think that your blog, your blog, your blog, has the ability to offer resistance to this (nonexistent) process?

Seriously?

Seriously.

There's nothing I can say to that. You checked out of reality several decades ago.
 
Last edited:
Just as I thought, you've got none. :rolleyes:

Your blog is nothing but parodies written with alot of satire. Spoofing the truth a bit, aren't ya?

Be grateful. If Nein11 was actually intelligent enough to support his lies with "evidence", however flimsy, it would be more difficult showing him to be the liar he is.
 
I always try to tell Truthers: No evidence from you means you're lying.

If you read the 9/11 thread again you will notice that my opponents had no chance in hell in debunking my theory [*]. That does not mean that my theory is true, as I admit in my blog itself. It only means that my theory is better than your OCT theory which has been thoroughly debunked.

http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

Disclaimer: nobody is guilty until convicted by a court of law. This blog's intent is to stimulate thinking about 9/11 from a different angle than the official one. From day one the blame has been put at bin Laden and his people without real evidence. Today bin Laden is no longer persecuted for 9/11 according to the FBI website. The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth. In the end it must be an official investigation that determines who is guilty and who is not. This blog is dedicated to Italian ex-president Cossiga who is the highest ranking statesman to date who has openly stated that it was the Mossad who has carried out the 9/11 attacks.
End of Disclaimer

[*] - one exception, I was forced to change my theory by including a 'gassing scenario' in the planes after my opponents convinced me that in the 9/11 planes the crew was always in a position of retaking the plane after an auto-pilot had run amok. This scenario was later perfectly confirmed by the pilot who shot down F93, he saw that everybody on board was dead.

http://911notes.blogspot.com/2009/05/pilot-who-shot-down-flight-93.html
 
Last edited:
They were not cavemen. They may or may not have been bearded, but they were not cavemen.

And the objection is not that the CIA and Mossad couldn't have done it. It's that they didn't.



Sorry to burst your bubble, but America is never going to be "Sovietized". There are too many gun-toting hypercapitalist rednecks in the South.

...And, truth be told, in most of the other regions as well.

EDIT: Waitaminute.



You are actually saying - like, you're serious about this - that you think that your blog, your blog, your blog, has the ability to offer resistance to this (nonexistent) process?

Seriously?

Seriously.

There's nothing I can say to that. You checked out of reality several decades ago.
I blame the coffeeshops.
 
If you read the 9/11 thread again you will notice that my opponents had no chance in hell in debunking my theory. That does not mean that my theory is true, as I admit in my blog itself. It only means that my theory is better than your OCT theory which has been thoroughly debunked.

Without any evidence to your theory, it's still just a theory.

Your theory is "better" than the Official Story? :dl:

Really Sherlock Jones? You don't have any evidence that you've debunked the Official Story.

You're just rambling like a lunatic!

The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth.

Some truth? Yeah right, when pigs can fly let me know.
 
Last edited:
IThis scenario was later perfectly confirmed by the pilot who shot down F93, he saw that everybody on board was dead.

Yup, those phone calls moments before were faked, along with the black box recordings of the hijackers deciding to put the plane into the ground.

You are either seriously delusional or a troll with waaay to much time.
 
This scenario was later perfectly confirmed by the pilot who shot down F93, he saw that everybody on board was dead.

There was no pilot that "shot down" Flight 93. That's an outright lie!

Fortunantly I live close to Shanksville, PA & I know alot of facts concerning Flight 93.

If Flight 93 was "shot down", then how could it have been shot down if there was a "stand down order" (as suggested by the Truth Movement)?

Answer that question while you're @ it 9/11 Investigator.

Also if Flight 93 was "shot down", please explain to everyone why the Johnstown Airport (aka John Murtha Airport) only has Apache Helicopters stationed there.

Also explain why the fighters were flying over or towards the North Atlantic Ocean.

Explain why Pilot Bill Wright saw Flight 93 before it crashed:

http://www.wtae.com/news/966339/detail.html

Wright thinks there's only one reason air traffic controllers in Cleveland would have been asking him about the altitude. He said that it was probably because the terrorists had cut off all radio transmissions to air traffic controllers.

"We figured there was a hijacking in progress, and we were seeing it happening, but that's all we knew," Wright said.

Wright got another clue when he and his passenger saw the path that the plane was taking.

"(It) went behind us. (We) lost sight for a while and when it came back (the passenger) said, 'It's turning toward us. Now it's turning away. Now turning back toward us.' So it was rocking its wings.

"It would bank hard left, bank hard right and then back to hard left. We saw it bank three or four times before we got away from it."

Wright said that may have been when several passengers were fighting back against the terrorists.

"The story of the plane being taken over, that fits," Wright said.
 
Last edited:
Also if Flight 93 was "shot down", please explain to everyone why the Johnstown Airport (aka John Murtha Airport) only has Apache Helicopters stationed there.

Not to take away from your point, but Apaches can be equiped with AIM-9 air to air missles on the wing tips :cool:.

Not like its even a plausible thought to consider.
 
Not to take away from your point, but Apaches can be equiped with AIM-9 air to air missles on the wing tips :cool:.

Not like its even a plausible thought to consider.

I know, but not a single 1 of the Apaches' was ordered into the air that day.

Of course Truthers will say about the AIM-9 missiles on the Apaches', but they can't think for a minute that a 200 mph helicopter is going to catch a 500 mph plane & expect them to get a fixed lock on it.
 
Last edited:
Code RED, people, Code RED! 9/11-investigator is on to us. The fox has jumped the banana tree. I repeat: The fox has jumped the banana tree!
 
Code RED, people, Code RED! 9/11-investigator is on to us. The fox has jumped the banana tree. I repeat: The fox has jumped the banana tree!

Will you stop gibbering and just get the phone number of that damn nun ?!?

I'm not getting any younger here.
 
Code RED, people, Code RED! 9/11-investigator is on to us. The fox has jumped the banana tree. I repeat: The fox has jumped the banana tree!

I thought Code RED was: "the bear has caught the salmon!"?

You all need to stop changing the codes and forgetting to send out the memos. :mad:
 
If you read the 9/11 thread again you will notice that my opponents had no chance in hell in debunking my theory [*]. That does not mean that my theory is true, as I admit in my blog itself. It only means that my theory is better than your OCT theory which has been thoroughly debunked.

http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/



[*] - one exception, I was forced to change my theory by including a 'gassing scenario' in the planes after my opponents convinced me that in the 9/11 planes the crew was always in a position of retaking the plane after an auto-pilot had run amok. This scenario was later perfectly confirmed by the pilot who shot down F93, he saw that everybody on board was dead.

http://911notes.blogspot.com/2009/05/pilot-who-shot-down-flight-93.html

You don't have a theory. A theory is a framework that explains evidence. You have no evidence therefore no theory.
 
And you are serious, I mean delirious.
Please, what is the food, the pill, the drink, or the substance you have to take to make these idiotic claims? Does it have bad side effects?

I'd be willing to bet it's hard to pronounce too.
 

Back
Top Bottom