• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Telepathy

Which is what I said...

Your claim in this thread is that in decades' time there will likely exist technology which can use what we already know about electromagnetism and the brain in order to facilitate electronic communication in a manner that's more direct than is possible with extant technology? I don't think anybody would disagree with that.

/Thread.
 
What an exciting discussion. We've gone from "telepathy is real, measurable, and I'm willing to prove my abilities with a test" to "I read an article about using an EKG machine to record brain activity and transferring that data to a TMS system".

That is telepathy in the same way that driving a RC car is telekinesis.
 
You know, there's something liberating about admitting you have no idea what you're talking about. It gives you permission to stay quiet and opens your mind to learning. Pretending to yourself that you have some superior knowledge will just keep you from ever actually accepting new information.


He backed out of a test that would have unambiguously revealed whether his claim about being able to read cards telepathically was true or false. He obviously not interested in learning the truth.
 
Maybe they're focused on the wrong frequency?

Nope. There's no such thing as "the wrong frequency." We've explored the electromagnetic spectrum from end to end, covering every part of it within our powers to detect. Wherever we have found a signal, we have dived deep into the frequencies detected, deep into the signals they carry.

The frequencies of the human brain are known. Its signals are well understood. Its frequencies have been thoroughly mapped and catalogued. Telepathy such as you describe does not exist there.

What some journalists fancifully call "telepathy" (and you ignorantly parrot as such) is simply the application of technological advances to better receive and transmit the signals we have already discovered. There are no other signals than these. Your idea of "wrong frequencies" is embarassingly deluded.
 
...
The frequencies of the human brain are known. Its signals are well understood. Its frequencies have been thoroughly mapped and catalogued. Telepathy such as you describe does not exist there.
...
No, this is not true.

The power of the brain is approximately 20 watt. What is the fraction of this power which is radiated as electromagnetic waves in the shortwave band (between 1.6 MHz and 30 MHz approximately, known for its long distance transmissions)? 1 milliwatt? 10 milliwatt? Does this power depend strongly on cerebral activity of the subject? Is it different for an alive person from its value for a corpse at room temperature?

This information is simply not known, the shortwave power (for example) seems to have never been measured seriously. We simply don't know the weak emission spectrum of the brain.
 
No, this is not true.

The power of the brain is approximately 20 watt. What is the fraction of this power which is radiated as electromagnetic waves in the shortwave band (between 1.6 MHz and 30 MHz approximately, known for its long distance transmissions)? 1 milliwatt? 10 milliwatt? Does this power depend strongly on cerebral activity of the subject? Is it different for an alive person from its value for a corpse at room temperature?

This information is simply not known, the shortwave power (for example) seems to have never been measured seriously. We simply don't know the weak emission spectrum of the brain.

Where to start with this pile of nonsense.

You refer to HF and it's range. Well that relies upon reflection of the ionosphere, however, FM is line of sight even though it is a higher "vibration". Care to explain that?

Are you even aware of the hobby of "DXing"?

How about the Numbers stations?
 
Seconded.
Michel, could you summarize in one or two concise paragraphs the general understanding of telepathy that you perceived in KotA's posts and that you consider to reflect reality? Thanks.

Michel, could you summarize in one or two concise paragraphs the general understanding of telepathy that you perceived in KotA's posts and that you consider to reflect reality? Thanks.
 
...
You refer to HF and it's range. Well that relies upon reflection of the ionosphere, however, FM is line of sight even though it is a higher "vibration". Care to explain that?
...
Electromagnetic radiation is actually never strictly "line of sight" (this is the approximation of geometrical optics, valid only for very short wavelengths).
 
Michel, could you summarize in one or two concise paragraphs the general understanding of telepathy that you perceived in KotA's posts and that you consider to reflect reality? Thanks.
It is not my priority to praise King of the A. on this forum. But I must nevertheless admit that he has a certain talent to identify and tell the truth, in his approximate style. He says he doesn't have much time, he is a busy man.
 
It is not my priority to praise King of the A. on this forum. But I must nevertheless admit that he has a certain talent to identify and tell the truth, in his approximate style. He says he doesn't have much time, he is a busy man.

I've seen less yellow on custard man.
 
Nope. There's no such thing as "the wrong frequency." We've explored the electromagnetic spectrum from end to end, covering every part of it within our powers to detect. Wherever we have found a signal, we have dived deep into the frequencies detected, deep into the signals they carry.

The frequencies of the human brain are known. Its signals are well understood. Its frequencies have been thoroughly mapped and catalogued. Telepathy such as you describe does not exist there.

What some journalists fancifully call "telepathy" (and you ignorantly parrot as such) is simply the application of technological advances to better receive and transmit the signals we have already discovered. There are no other signals than these. Your idea of "wrong frequencies" is embarassingly deluded.

Did you just postulate that 'science' no longer needs to study brain waves because we already know everything?

ROTFLMAO
 
No, this is not true.

The power of the brain is approximately 20 watt. What is the fraction of this power which is radiated as electromagnetic waves in the shortwave band (between 1.6 MHz and 30 MHz approximately, known for its long distance transmissions)? 1 milliwatt? 10 milliwatt? Does this power depend strongly on cerebral activity of the subject? Is it different for an alive person from its value for a corpse at room temperature?

This information is simply not known, the shortwave power (for example) seems to have never been measured seriously. We simply don't know the weak emission spectrum of the brain.

Interesting...say more things.
 

Back
Top Bottom