King of the Americas
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2001
- Messages
- 6,513
. may be possible some day.
Dave
Which is what I said...
. may be possible some day.
Dave
Which is what I said...
Recent events and displays of well researched data has indicated to me, that 'telepathy' or the ability to extend one's consciousness beyond one's cranium is a real measurable phenomena, that has its basis in natural selection.
Which is what I said...
I googled "peer reviewed, evidence for telepathy"
You know, there's something liberating about admitting you have no idea what you're talking about. It gives you permission to stay quiet and opens your mind to learning. Pretending to yourself that you have some superior knowledge will just keep you from ever actually accepting new information.
He obviously not interested in learning the truth.
Maybe they're focused on the wrong frequency?
I would say instead that he is quite interested in not learning the truth.
No, this is not true....
The frequencies of the human brain are known. Its signals are well understood. Its frequencies have been thoroughly mapped and catalogued. Telepathy such as you describe does not exist there.
...
No, this is not true.
The power of the brain is approximately 20 watt. What is the fraction of this power which is radiated as electromagnetic waves in the shortwave band (between 1.6 MHz and 30 MHz approximately, known for its long distance transmissions)? 1 milliwatt? 10 milliwatt? Does this power depend strongly on cerebral activity of the subject? Is it different for an alive person from its value for a corpse at room temperature?
This information is simply not known, the shortwave power (for example) seems to have never been measured seriously. We simply don't know the weak emission spectrum of the brain.
Seconded.
Michel, could you summarize in one or two concise paragraphs the general understanding of telepathy that you perceived in KotA's posts and that you consider to reflect reality? Thanks.
Electromagnetic radiation is actually never strictly "line of sight" (this is the approximation of geometrical optics, valid only for very short wavelengths)....
You refer to HF and it's range. Well that relies upon reflection of the ionosphere, however, FM is line of sight even though it is a higher "vibration". Care to explain that?
...
It is not my priority to praise King of the A. on this forum. But I must nevertheless admit that he has a certain talent to identify and tell the truth, in his approximate style. He says he doesn't have much time, he is a busy man.Michel, could you summarize in one or two concise paragraphs the general understanding of telepathy that you perceived in KotA's posts and that you consider to reflect reality? Thanks.
It is not my priority to praise King of the A. on this forum. But I must nevertheless admit that he has a certain talent to identify and tell the truth, in his approximate style. He says he doesn't have much time, he is a busy man.
Really? How do you see anything?Electromagnetic radiation is actually never strictly "line of sight" (this is the approximation of geometrical optics, valid only for very short wavelengths).
Nope. There's no such thing as "the wrong frequency." We've explored the electromagnetic spectrum from end to end, covering every part of it within our powers to detect. Wherever we have found a signal, we have dived deep into the frequencies detected, deep into the signals they carry.
The frequencies of the human brain are known. Its signals are well understood. Its frequencies have been thoroughly mapped and catalogued. Telepathy such as you describe does not exist there.
What some journalists fancifully call "telepathy" (and you ignorantly parrot as such) is simply the application of technological advances to better receive and transmit the signals we have already discovered. There are no other signals than these. Your idea of "wrong frequencies" is embarassingly deluded.
I would say instead that he is quite interested in not learning the truth.
No, this is not true.
The power of the brain is approximately 20 watt. What is the fraction of this power which is radiated as electromagnetic waves in the shortwave band (between 1.6 MHz and 30 MHz approximately, known for its long distance transmissions)? 1 milliwatt? 10 milliwatt? Does this power depend strongly on cerebral activity of the subject? Is it different for an alive person from its value for a corpse at room temperature?
This information is simply not known, the shortwave power (for example) seems to have never been measured seriously. We simply don't know the weak emission spectrum of the brain.
No, he didn't. You simply created that man of straw to avoid the question.Did you just postulate that 'science' no longer needs to study brain waves because we already know everything?
ROTFLMAO