• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Telepathy

Loss Leader said:
My pacemaker/defibrillator communicates wirelessly with outside monitors via magnetic pulses (or "frequency"). Stop pretending you have any idea what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

Did you not know that was why some people run screaming from you grabbing their heads and shouting "turn it bloody down I heard you the first time!"
 
The idea of science not being able to detect these emissions is laughable in the year that the Nobel prize in physics went to Rainer Weiss, Kip Thorne, and Barry Barsham.
 
abaddon said:
Yes, well, my long dead mother had 2 of those in her time having had three heart attacks and a quad bypass.
Click to expand...


I'm on my fourth.


Darat said:
Did you not know that was why some people run screaming from you grabbing their heads and shouting "turn it bloody down I heard you the first time!"
Click to expand...


I asked the technician once how fast the data was being transferred and was surprised that it was only equivalent to 300 baud. That's as slow as my first modem twenty-five years ago.
 
Loss Leader said:
I'm on my fourth.





I asked the technician once how fast the data was being transferred and was surprised that it was only equivalent to 300 baud. That's as slow as my first modem twenty-five years ago.
Click to expand...

It is some years ago, now, but from memory, that is intentional due to data loss considerations. As explained to me at the time, Voyager 1 and 2 are giving far less than that, why? to minimise data loss in the available channel.

In fairness, that was some 16 years ago, and the channel was over copper pair at the time. Things have likely moved along in the interim. In my experience, while the med tech is astonishing, it is also a lap behind due to the necessity for robust reliability.
 
abaddon said:
In my experience, while the med tech is astonishing, it is also a lap behind due to the necessity for robust reliability.
Click to expand...


Yes, the need for rock solid reliability is an important factor. I was told another one is the workings of the FDA itself. A medical device has to go through much the same testing as a drug, which is a lengthy process. By the time it's over, the technology is already old. But then it can't be easily updated either, because that would require new testing and licensing (on a shorter but still inconvenient schedule).
 
King of the Americas said:
Meh...maybe.
Click to expand...

So you can't actually say what you understand the word "frequency" to mean in this context, so you just admit that perhaps you're talking nonsense? If your response is genuine, then the question is - how has this revelation affected your thinking and beliefs? If your response is not genuine, then the question is - if you truly believe what you're saying, why are you afraid to try to define the terms you're using?
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
So you can't actually say what you understand the word "frequency" to mean in this context, so you just admit that perhaps you're talking nonsense? If your response is genuine, then the question is - how has this revelation affected your thinking and beliefs? If your response is not genuine, then the question is - if you truly believe what you're saying, why are you afraid to try to define the terms you're using?
Click to expand...

Clarity is the enemy of imaginary knowledge?
 
fagin said:
I assume he didn't actually read the first article.

The second is a list of 'Selected Psi Research Publications' maintained by this guy http://skepdic.com/essays/radin.html

'The evidence Radin presents, however, is little more than a hodgepodge of occult statistics.'
Click to expand...

I did actually, and I think it's evidence that science is on the right track as far as discovering what the mind can actually do.

I said earlier that we just don't yet fully understand what's going on, and we don't have good tools for measuring yet...

Snip from the article-

“Could there be potential for sending someone a thought that’s not desirable to them?” he says. “Those kinds of things are theoretically in the realm of possibility."
 
Last edited:
King of the Americas said:
I said earlier that we just don't yet fully understand what's going on, and we don't have good tools for measuring yet...
Click to expand...


You know, there's something liberating about admitting you have no idea what you're talking about. It gives you permission to stay quiet and opens your mind to learning. Pretending to yourself that you have some superior knowledge will just keep you from ever actually accepting new information.
 
King of the Americas said:
I said earlier that we just don't yet fully understand what's going on, and we don't have good tools for measuring yet...
Click to expand...

Yes, you said that, but you're trivially, demonstrably wrong, and you've not given any evidence whatsoever to support your assertion. In the mean time, you've been unable to explain what "tools" you use in order to determine that psychic abilities exist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom