lexicon008
Thinker
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 241
So you would believe that it was chocolate then?
is that what i said? No. next stupid question.
So you would believe that it was chocolate then?
is that what i said? No. next stupid question.
Well, you did say you would tell your friend to pick it up and enjoy it. Would you disbelieve your friend and thus play a cruel joke on him? If so, why don't you believe him? Did anyone test it?
If my friend is confused enough to look at dog crap and say it is chocolate ice cream and then on top of that eat it, i probably would take him to the hospital because something is obviously wrong with his mental status.
Ahhh, your friend was confused. What if it wasn't easy to tell the difference, and even more, what if your friend was unaware of any way to tell a difference, and grew up only knowing of the chocolate and wasn't aware that crap even existed?
How about you make your point and stop with the fecalphelia.
So, are you having a problem discerning the difference between metaphor and reality? Should I thus be unable to say a judgement you make about reality is correct? It seems you are even taking the metaphor as a description of my predilections, with no actual evidence to make that judgement.
hey you're the one going on about dog crap..the adults are discussing more important issues...when you have a non dog crap related point please let me know.
Merriam-Webster said:met·a·phor noun \ˈme-tə-ˌfȯr also -fər\
Definition of METAPHOR
1 : a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them (as in drowning in money); broadly : figurative language — compare simile
2 : an object, activity, or idea treated as a metaphor : symbol
Ftfy
Thought this might help...
this wasn't a metaphor..it was a question..a question that i answered. There is no comparison between that question and the subject of this thread.
So once again..what is your point?
Do you honestly beleive that a thinking, breathing, rational, non restrained person would knowingly stand in an area that was causing them to be burned alive?
Perhaps you could show where in your picture the molten material is so we can judge whether they are standing over it or beside it....
I'm telling you there wasn't molten metal.
You see the pics of men and women standing on top of the pile.
Anywhere there is a person, there is most certainly not
a boiling pot of molten metal below.
There was no molten metal. Period. Tons and tons of damaged
metal. Steel beams broken up. Steel beams foamed up. Steel powder.
But no molten metal.

so your saying that all the people who claim they saw molten metal are lying or mistaken...yet you think somehow the steel was turned into foam..wow![]()
so your saying that all the people who claim they saw molten metal are lying or mistaken...yet you think somehow the steel was turned into foam..wow![]()
You can't get around the fact that those people walked all over the debris pile and survived.
What do you think he meant instead?
How about molten steel?Molten metal in the debris pile was observed be many credible sources. I have no reason to disbelief those eyewitnesses.
My point is, Robertson did not say molten in that lecture. If you watch the clip you will see it has been edited just before the part about removing the rock from the wall, why bother editing it? We have no idea what he was talking about before hand. It's just another truther video which claims Robertson confirmed molten metal in the basement of wtc.
If lexi wants to keep saying he said molten and skip the fact he said like, it just shows he is full of truther BS.