theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
Australia. Not allowed is the default. Citizens have to appeal to the state for an exception.Are there any countries in which citizens aren’t allowed to own guns?
Australia. Not allowed is the default. Citizens have to appeal to the state for an exception.Are there any countries in which citizens aren’t allowed to own guns?
Total BS...Australia. Not allowed is the default. Citizens have to appeal to the state for an exception.
Oh okay. So gun ownership is the default, and the state must justify denying it, in Australia. That's not what I've been led to believe. But you know better: Australians are entitled to own any kind of gun they want, unless the state can satisfy the high court that an exception should be made.Total BS...
Like most first world countries- it is quite possible to get a gun legally, hell its not even that hard here....
It is a damn sight harder getting a commercial marine radio licence than a gun licence....
I guess it's that Americans are just inherently more violent than other people. They have more violent genes? They're genetically less inclined to peace and harmony?The vast majority of gun owners never shoot anyone. Its only a very tiny fraction.
There are many other societies that have lots of guns, and MUCH lower violent crime rates than the USA. Clearly the problem is not too many guns.
But they will at the drop of a hat if they decide that they have to.I don't think anyone is actually interested in killing people.
When you have a gun for self-defence, the two are the same. If you have a gun and you decide on the need for self-defence, are you saying that you're not going to use it?Just because you want to be able to defend yourself doesn't mean you WANT to shoot anyone.
It may interest you to know that other countries have metropolitan areas too, and many of those metropolitan areas also have a lot of crime. You know what the difference is? Our crime is less often fatal. Do you have any clue why that might be the case?Yes, many US metropolitan areas have a lot of crime. Hard to get away from it unless you live and stay in rural areas.
I'm going to disagree with @Dabop here and say yes - not allowed is the default. Furthermore I think that is a good thing. Most people - the vast majority, in fact - don't need a gun. They have no reason to. There are a small number of sporting shooters and hunters, recreational and commercial, but for the most part, there is no need for ownership to be the default. There's also no reason why most people need plutonium, so not allowed is the default there too.Australia. Not allowed is the default. Citizens have to appeal to the state for an exception.
Appreciate the confirmation. What an awful place to live, though.Yes, many US metropolitan areas have a lot of crime. Hard to get away from it unless you live and stay in rural areas.
Hitler, Stalin, and Kim Jong-Un agree with you.I'm going to disagree with @Dabop here and say yes - not allowed is the default. Furthermore I think that is a good thing. Most people - the vast majority, in fact - don't need a gun. They have no reason to. There are a small number of sporting shooters and hunters, recreational and commercial, but for the most part, there is no need for ownership to be the default. There's also no reason why most people need plutonium, so not allowed is the default there too.
Yes, sometimes the USA is pretty awful.Appreciate the confirmation. What an awful place to live, though.
C'mon, man, optics. Black men killing white people (especially white women) are a fairly rare crime, and you found four out of five in your cited crimes (the fifth appears to be an Indian man who killed a white man)? What are the odds?Yes, sometimes the USA is pretty awful.
![]()
Like driver's licenses. You don't automatically get one issued to you when you turn 17 (or however old you need to be to be allowed drive). You need to pass various skill and knowledge tests first, and not be a criminal psychopath or something. So "allowed", yes. "Granted by default", no.I'm going to disagree with @Dabop here and say yes - not allowed is the default. Furthermore I think that is a good thing. Most people - the vast majority, in fact - don't need a gun. They have no reason to. There are a small number of sporting shooters and hunters, recreational and commercial, but for the most part, there is no need for ownership to be the default. There's also no reason why most people need plutonium, so not allowed is the default there too.
That;s what everybody who has never been roused unexpectedly from sleep and thrust into a life or death situation in the dark thinks.No, im a really good shot. Enemy will be neutralized, loved one will be unharmed.
Godwinning the thread already? I'm surprised at you.Hitler, Stalin, and Kim Jong-Un agree with you.
Only one of those people died from gunshot, and it was self-inflicted.Hitler, Stalin, and Kim Jong-Un agree with you.
Have you've ever had to use your tight choke, slug and good aim in defense of yourself and / or others?Dont need much marksmanship with a shotgun.![]()
What I objected to was the loaded 'crawling to the government' nonsense that usually comes from the US far right idiots lolI'm going to disagree with @Dabop here and say yes - not allowed is the default. Furthermore I think that is a good thing. Most people - the vast majority, in fact - don't need a gun. They have no reason to. There are a small number of sporting shooters and hunters, recreational and commercial, but for the most part, there is no need for ownership to be the default. There's also no reason why most people need plutonium, so not allowed is the default there too.
Australia. Not allowed is the default. Citizens have to appeal to the state for an exception.
Then you see it wrong. By that logic driving a car is banned, but you can apply for an exemption.The way I see it: guns are banned by default, but citizens can apply for an exception.
In the USA it seems that it is easier to obtain a gun than a driver's license.Then you see it wrong. By that logic driving a car is banned, but you can apply for an exemption.
I have no problem with this logic. It's the exact same thing.Then you see it wrong. By that logic driving a car is banned, but you can apply for an exemption.
This is all you. I didn't say or imply any of it.What I objected to was the loaded 'crawling to the government' nonsense that usually comes from the US far right idiots lol
Its nothing of the sort- do your training, have your gun safe installed and checked, get your license, and after the cooling off period, buy your gun/s...
Getting your truck licence is a LOT more work- takes a LOT longer, and costs a lot more money than getting a gun licence...
What I object to is that loaded message that we are 'all slaves' except the free gunstrokers....
Ironically, its the ones that get off on gun ownership/ammosexuals that usually are the ones who SHOULDN'T have any weapons....