• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Questions Truthers can't answer

So you also agree that Mr Blanchard's paper is from the highest qualified demolition professional so far?

Among the debunkers, that is. Many qualified members of the 9/11 Truth movement have already explained it.
 
The Scholars for 9/11 Truth, the Scholars for 9/11 truth and Justice, the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and the Pilots for 9/11 Truth, all investigative bodies, have all determined that 9/11 was an inside job.

I also heard a rumor that the city council of Hogg Flats passed a resolution that 9/11 was an inside job.
Neither are any of them investigative bodies but all of them are certified lunatics. Now tell us why they should be considered credible....oh wait, forget that. You still didn't answer post #57 cause you are a liar and an impotent truherbot.
 
Among the debunkers, that is. Many qualified members of the 9/11 Truth movement have already explained it.


Really? What did they say? Oh, I almost forget, how does one become a "qualified" liar?

How's the Osama Conundrum coming along? I notice that LastCh--sorry, Roundhead has run away.
 
Neither are any of them investigative bodies but all of them are certified lunatics. Now tell us why they should be considered credible....oh wait, forget that. You still didn't answer post #57 cause you are a liar and an impotent truherbot.

I did, see post # 133.
 
I'm thinking of voting for Obama, is that considered the Obama Conundrum?

But I'll probably vote for Bob Barr or another Third party candidate.


No, you will vote for Obama.

Now, how about that terribly awkward Osama Conundrum (see post # 117).
 
I did, see post # 133.
bologna. You claimed you didn't feel like answering it and your post 133 in no way answers either part 1 or part 2 of my question....you fail yet again. Isn't it tiring failing so spectacularly and so often? Don't you understand the agony of defeat now?
 
1. Why was Atta carrying a passport on a one way trip to nowhere, he surely wasnt going to need it.And how did it survive intact. Why did he have luggage he intended to be on his flight, was he staying somwhere that night after impact.

I'm guessing a sense of "neatness". Atta appears to have been a very careful, tidy and precise person. He wouldn't have wanted to leave behind any loose ends. Others of the hijackers were not this way.


2.Why did Burlingame hand over the controls of his plane to a 110 pound Arab with a box cutter.All his friends said he wouldnt have.

Because Burlingame was dead.


3.How did Bush's staff know he wasnt a target, they allowed him to hang around after the attack was in progress in the classroom. Then allowed him to take off without ANY escort in his plane.

Because he was in a secure location, which he wouldn't be if they moved him out of the school.


4.How can four planes fly around and none be intercepted when its common that errant planes are.

I have researched this matter in detail, and we can discuss further if you like in another thread, but in short the above is false.


5.Why did a leading General outright lie and say our radar systems were looking outward, not inward, a bald faced lie.

It's not a lie; it's a simplification. NORAD utlisises primary feeds from the ARSR-4 radars of the Joint Surveillance System - perimeter radars around the borders and coastline of the USA. While these radars look both inwards and outwards, NORAD was interested in contacts approaching from over the coast - in particular small low-flying aircraft attempting to evade radar. As such they had radar sensitivity amplified.

You can do this over water because water produces very little ground clutter. Unfortunately it has the adverse side effect of increasing ground clutter so much on the landward side of the radar's coverage area that all radar information is rendered useless.



6.Why did the 9/11 commision outright lie about the composition of the building cores of WTC 1 and Two.

They didn't. This is one of Dr Griffin's "Omissions and Distortions" and it's yet another that's wrong.


7. How did not a soul get fired.

Not a soul was found negligent in their duties. If it makes you feel any better one of the staff handling security check in for one of the flights was so torn with remorse that they committed suicide.


8.Why did the commision ignore and not address scores of pertinent questions from 9/11 victims families.

They didn't. Said relatives simply either think their question wasn't answered when it was, or thought their question was pertinent when it wasn't.


9. Why did my Govt spend more money investigating Clinton getting a hummer , than on 9/11.

The total cost of investigation 9/11 likely ran into tens of billions of dollars, and would have been the most costly investigation in human history.


10. Why do people think its absurd that our Govt kills(or allows) its own citizens to forward an objective, when they positively did during the USS Liberty incident.

What's absurd is that people like you will accuse the government of killing its own citizens without a shred of evidence, and in conflict with mountains of evidence that indicates they did no such thing.
 
I'm guessing a sense of "neatness". Atta appears to have been a very careful, tidy and precise person. He wouldn't have wanted to leave behind any loose ends. Others of the hijackers were not this way.
Uh....it was Satam Al Suqami who's passport was found. The Guardian got it wrong.
 
bologna. You claimed you didn't feel like answering it and your post 133 in no way answers either part 1 or part 2 of my question....you fail yet again. Isn't it tiring failing so spectacularly and so often? Don't you understand the agony of defeat now?

bologna is a city in Italy. Professor Magini taught there, he beat me out for that teaching position in 1589, when i was 25 years old. He also claimed he couldn't see the moons of Jupiter in my telescope in 1610.

What exactly do you want me to answer, you'll have to re-post it.
 
bologna is a city in Italy. Professor Magini taught there, he beat me out for that teaching position in 1589, when i was 25 years old. He also claimed he couldn't see the moons of Jupiter in my telescope in 1610.

What exactly do you want me to answer, you'll have to re-post it.


Aw, c'mon, Magini told me that he saw people mooning you all the time, and he didn't need a telescope.
 
No, you will vote for Obama.

Now, how about that terribly awkward Osama Conundrum (see post # 117).

All I know is that Osama issued three press releases saying he didn't do 9/11. Real terrorists claim responsibility right away. That's the point of terror.

The only thing that caught my attention on the day of 9/11 is that no terrorist group claimed responsibility.
 
bologna is a city in Italy. Professor Magini taught there, he beat me out for that teaching position in 1589, when i was 25 years old. He also claimed he couldn't see the moons of Jupiter in my telescope in 1610.

What exactly do you want me to answer, you'll have to re-post it.
Nice try...you'll just have to read it for yourself in post #57...
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom