Questions Truthers can't answer

Yes, but to be a qualified member of the truth movement, you simply have to be an idiot, so that doesn't help much.

TAM:)
 
Galileo said:
I read somewhere that there were no visible fires coming out of WTC 2 after about 9:40. Since I didn't have time to check out the claim, I thought I'd post it here to see if anyone could debunk it. Looks like that may have happened on that specific factoid. That's why I come here, you know, I have no interest in converting anyone here, your minds are already made up.

That said, it still clear the fires were diminishing in WTC 2 after 9:40.

I will comment officially on your photos after my photographic experts Jim Fetzer and Ace Baker certify that they aren't fakes.
Click to expand...


No, this is your exact quote from post #6:

The fire in WTC 2 was going out. No visible flames can be seen after 9:40. The controlled demolition had to be at least superficially plausible, silly.
Click to expand...

You weren't "post(ing) it here to see if anyone could debunk it", you were asserting it as an absolute fact.

All because you read it "somewhere".

That is the extent of your knowledge on this subject, spouting "factoids" from random websites that only support what you believe. You've shown no real evidence, no reasoning ability, no desire for information. You just go scurrying off to google, plug in a question you were asked, and regurgitate whatever is written on one of your conspiracy websites.

Now tell me, after getting that simple fact wrong, why should we believe anything you say?
 
Galileo said:
All I know is that Osama issued three press releases saying he didn't do 9/11. Real terrorists claim responsibility right away. That's the point of terror.

The only thing that caught my attention on the day of 9/11 is that no terrorist group claimed responsibility.
Click to expand...



Stop lying: there are adults here. Osama issued a routine disclaimer to prevent an American attack on the Taliban. When that ploy failed, he repeatedly explained his role in planning the 9/11 attacks.

By the way, if the "real" Osama didn't do it, why didn't the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy announce that it had killed the fake one?

Thought we'd forget? No, you can run, but you can't hide.
 
Galileo said:
Appoint honest people to head the CIA, FBI, and U.S. military, then order the heads of these departments to produce the documents that prove 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...
:dl:

So you have no answer to my question.

Yup, that's a question Truthers can't answer all right.
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
All I know is that Osama issued three press releases saying he didn't do 9/11. Real terrorists claim responsibility right away. That's the point of terror.

The only thing that caught my attention on the day of 9/11 is that no terrorist group claimed responsibility.
Click to expand...

And nobody as since, oh wait.....................

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/sep/10/alqaida.september112001
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/page/0,12643,839823,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.html
 
roundhead said:
Questions untruthers cant answer


1. Why was Atta carrying a passport on a one way trip to nowhere, he surely wasnt going to need it.And how did it survive intact. Why did he have luggage he intended to be on his flight, was he staying somwhere that night after impact.

2.Why did Burlingame hand over the controls of his plane to a 110 pound Arab with a box cutter.All his friends said he wouldnt have.

3.How did Bush's staff know he wasnt a target, they allowed him to hang around after the attack was in progress in the classroom. Then allowed him to take off without ANY escort in his plane.

4.How can four planes fly around and none be intercepted when its common that errant planes are.

5.Why did a leading General outright lie and say our radar systems were looking outward, not inward, a bald faced lie.

6.Why did the 9/11 commision outright lie about the composition of the building cores of WTC 1 and Two.

7. How did not a soul get fired.

8.Why did the commision ignore and not address scores of pertinent questions from 9/11 victims families.

9. Why did my Govt spend more money investigating Clinton getting a hummer , than on 9/11.

10. Why do people think its absurd that our Govt kills(or allows) its own citizens to forward an objective, when they positively did during the USS Liberty incident.

I can think of countless more, just tired of typing
Click to expand...

I can answer at least part of the first one; most airlines even prior to 9/11 required a government issued identification card or papers in order to board flights. A passport works just as well as a drivers license or other government issued ID card. Maybe he lost his drivers license and had to use the passport instead.

Just a thought.
 
Sabrina said:
I can answer at least part of the first one; most airlines even prior to 9/11 required a government issued identification card or papers in order to board flights. A passport works just as well as a drivers license or other government issued ID card. Maybe he lost his drivers license and had to use the passport instead.

Just a thought.
Click to expand...
Is it worth correcting the error and letting these guys know the passport belonged to Satam Al Suqam?
 
Galileo said:
You are guilty of conspiracy if you commit an overt act to further the conspiracy. Writing the conspiracy plan down on paper and giving it to the president is an overt act.
Click to expand...

What conspiracy was furthered? The "conspiracy" to remotely destroy an unmanned plane and blame it on the Cubans was an idea proposed by one person (Lyman Lemintzer) and rejected by the first person he sent it to (McNamara). It started and ended with him. One person. By definition, this was not a conspiracy.

It also did not involve the killing of Americans. So your idea of "evidence" that the government is willing to conspire to kill Americans is something which did not involve the killing of Americans, was not a conspiracy, and was rejected by the government? Don't make me laugh.
 
~enigma~ said:
Is it worth correcting the error and letting these guys know the passport belonged to Satam Al Suqam?
Click to expand...

Does it matter? He's still a hijacker. *L*

Something tells me most truthers don't bother to differentiate between the hijackers; they do for the pilots, because they're more easily identified, but the rest not so much. And even the pilots are misidentified by them often.
 
~enigma~ said:
Is it worth correcting the error and letting these guys know the passport belonged to Satam Al Suqam?
Click to expand...


I think so. It's one of the reasons I have begged the question 3 times in this thread. Some people read and believe things without checking the facts. And what is the definition of "intact"?

It also reminded me of the old joke - how many of each animal did Moses take into the Ark?:D
 
Björn Toulouse said:
I think so. It's one of the reasons I have begged the question 3 times in this thread. Some people read and believe things without checking the facts. And what is the definition of "intact"?

It also reminded me of the old joke - how many of each animal did Moses take into the Ark?:D
Click to expand...


Any conspiracy liar worth his salt would quickly remind you that it makes no difference as both Moses and Noah were Joooos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom