Questions Truthers can't answer

[Galileo]

An agenda-driven ignoramus doesn't think he is, but the demolition industry disagrees. As usual, the conspiracy liar is wrong.

Blanchard is not a controlled demolition expert, he only works there. He has no license or training in the area of contolled demolition. Basically, he's the manager of people who do contolled demolitions.

 

[e^n]

Blanchard is not a controlled demolition expert, he only works there. He has no license or training in the area of contolled demolition. Basically, he's the manager of people who do contolled demolitions.

Well considering he has published a paper that would put him as the most qualified person in the demolition industry that has published on this topic? As far as I know anyway.

 

[pomeroo]

I find it funny MSM is scared to death to show it. Idiots indeed

Well, the MSM is very crafty. The New York Times has reflexively endorsed every Democrat running for President in the last 50+ years just to disguise its role in Bush's monstrous crime. It's great the way these guys pretend to oppose absolutely everything Bush does in order to trick low-IQ adolescents who have never read a book.

Now, all you and your fellow liars have to do is find a demolition expert who thinks there were explosives in the Towers.

Really? Not one? Why do you suppose these so-called experts know so much less than you agenda-driven liars?

 

[Galileo]

It does matter if the explosives were destroyed because then they (the explosives) would not have exploded in the impact zone (where the collapse initiated).

That doesn't matter because not enough explosives went off to begin collapse initiation.

The explosives were that were inside the core columns (the core columns next to the elevator shafts) were in a position to be safe from fire, and underneath the fireproofing.

Other explosives were wrapped in jet fuel tight & fire retardent baggie wraps.

 

[Galileo]

Yeah...your just an impotent truthling with a mental problem. How many normal people claim they are Galileo Galilei. Your ramblings are those of an insane person.

I'm an expert on Galileo.

 

[pomeroo]

Blanchard is not a controlled demolition expert, he only works there. He has no license or training in the area of contolled demolition. Basically, he's the manager of people who do contolled demolitions.

Yes, we get the idea that Blanchard is a trained seismologist who is a major name in the demolition industry. His paper exposed the ignorant fantasies of an evil movement. Tell us why ALL demolition experts reject the baseless nonsense fabricated by you liars.

 

[pomeroo]

That doesn't matter because not enough explosives went off to begin collapse initiation.

The explosives were that were inside the core columns (the core columns next to the elevator shafts) were in a position to be safe from fire, and underneath the fireproofing.

Other explosives were wrapped in jet fuel tight & fire retardent baggie wraps.

You have been caught lying again. There were no--zero--explosives in the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks.

You and your fellow America-hating liars have never produced a shred of evidence for your dishonest claim.

 

[pomeroo]

I'm an expert on Galileo.

With apologies to Jamie Lee Curtis, Galileo never said, "I'll moider da bum."

 

[~enigma~]

I'm an expert on Galileo.

Yet you think you are him therefore you are delusional....seek professional help.

 

[pomeroo]

Not sure if you're being serious, but I'll answer anyway.

First of all, efficient master criminals often keep many incriminating documents. The nazis are a good example.

There are certainly many documents showing the existence and details of the 9/11 wargames that could be found.

There are documents showing the tracking of the hiajckers before 9/11. Many documents refer to other documents, so you can't hide tham all. Also, good people will always have documents or copies of documents, that show what they were doing on 9/11, remember, only a very small number of people planned this operation, and most were just following orders.

There are also documents showing the relationship between the goevernment and the security companies involved in 9/11.

While your careful avoidance of post #84 shows that even extremely stupid people can possess a rudimentary sense of self-preservation, we note that you, like the rest of your evil movement, can't begin to explain how your imaginary conspiracy functions.

 

[~enigma~]

Other explosives were wrapped in jet fuel tight & fire retardent baggie wraps.

Need anything more be said...

 

[roundhead]

Well, the MSM is very crafty. The New York Times has reflexively endorsed every Democrat running for President in the last 50+ years just to disguise its role in Bush's monstrous crime. It's great the way these guys pretend to oppose absolutely everything Bush does in order to trick low-IQ adolescents who have never read a book.

Now, all you and your fellow liars have to do is find a demolition expert who thinks there were explosives in the Towers.

Really? Not one? Why do you suppose these so-called experts know so much less than you agenda-driven liars?

Demms /Pubs Minor differences.They all feed at the same trough.


Clinton was in office during OKC was he not.

Perhaps our nations foremost authority on explosives and they're effects (Partin)addressed the house saying it wasnt just the truck bomb. With excellent, believable and experienced testimony.It fell on deaf ears.

I assume you will try and belittle his tests, logic , or patriotism. I dont.


OKC was, 9/11 was....Dem/Pub

 

[Galileo]

Questions untruthers cant answer


1. Why was Atta carrying a passport on a one way trip to nowhere, he surely wasnt going to need it.And how did it survive intact. Why did he have luggage he intended to be on his flight, was he staying somwhere that night after impact.

2.Why did Burlingame hand over the controls of his plane to a 110 pound Arab with a box cutter.All his friends said he wouldnt have.

3.How did Bush's staff know he wasnt a target, they allowed him to hang around after the attack was in progress in the classroom. Then allowed him to take off without ANY escort in his plane.

4.How can four planes fly around and none be intercepted when its common that errant planes are.

5.Why did a leading General outright lie and say our radar systems were looking outward, not inward, a bald faced lie.

6.Why did the 9/11 commision outright lie about the composition of the building cores of WTC 1 and Two.

7. How did not a soul get fired.

8.Why did the commision ignore and not address scores of pertinent questions from 9/11 victims families.

9. Why did my Govt spend more money investigating Clinton getting a hummer , than on 9/11.

10. Why do people think its absurd that our Govt kills(or allows) its own citizens to forward an objective, when they positively did during the USS Liberty incident.

I can think of countless more, just tired of typing

1. Atta was a patsie, he was murdered on 9/11. He was a foreigner, so he carried his passport everywhere.

2. Burligmame was shot to death by the hijackers.

3. Bush knew about the 9/11 plot about 6 days prior.

4. The wargames prevented intercept.

5. Military leaders lie all the time.

6. The 9/11 Commission was a political investigation, not a scientific investigation. That said, the lie about the core was good disinfo.

7. The government never likes to admit its mistakes.

8. The 9/11 Commission was political propganda, they didn't care about the 9/11 families.

9. Because the republican party pushed the Clinto investigation, no party pushed the 9/11 investigation.

10. The government kills people all the time, whether it be the Drug War or a shooting war.

 

[applecorped]

What?

 

[Galileo]

Well considering he has published a paper that would put him as the most qualified person in the demolition industry that has published on this topic? As far as I know anyway.

You hit the nail on the head, no qualified demolition expert has written a paper expalining how the WTC fell down.

 

[Galileo]

Well, the MSM is very crafty. The New York Times has reflexively endorsed every Democrat running for President in the last 50+ years just to disguise its role in Bush's monstrous crime. It's great the way these guys pretend to oppose absolutely everything Bush does in order to trick low-IQ adolescents who have never read a book.

Now, all you and your fellow liars have to do is find a demolition expert who thinks there were explosives in the Towers.

Really? Not one? Why do you suppose these so-called experts know so much less than you agenda-driven liars?

The NYT is pro-Israel, and 9/11 benefitted Israel.

 

[applecorped]

 

[Galileo]

While your careful avoidance of post #84 shows that even extremely stupid people can possess a rudimentary sense of self-preservation, we note that you, like the rest of your evil movement, can't begin to explain how your imaginary conspiracy functions.

9/11 wasn't a conspiracy, it was a legal military false-flag operation.

 

[johnny karate]

In 2004, the following books were published:

The 9/11 Commission Report

The 9/11 Commission, Omissions & Distortions by Griffin

The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson

Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Rupert

All the public evidence needed to prove 9/11 was an inside job was available and organized by the end of 2004.

How wonderful for you. However, this doesn't answer my question. Please try again:

Why has not a single law enforcement agency, investigative body, or MSM outlet on the planet discerned and/or revealed the Truth behind the events of 9/11?

 

[applecorped]