Questions about Hyperinsulinemia/Diabetes

[MRC_Hans]

Well, he sure has resorted to simple trolling a lot faster than usual in this thread. Might we finally be approaching a flame-out? .. But it has seemed like that before, and he has bounced back.

Hans

 

[Donks]

Well, he sure has resorted to simple trolling a lot faster than usual in this thread. Might we finally be approaching a flame-out? .. But it has seemed like that before, and he has bounced back.

Hans

He'll just start a new thread and pretend nothing has happened. Every thread with Kumar is like if it was the first thread he ever posts, we always start from scratch.

 

[Darat]

He'll just start a new thread and pretend nothing has happened. Every thread with Kumar is like if it was the first thread he ever posts, we always start from scratch.

I wonder if Oliver Sacks may include him in an update to one of his books?

 

[Donks]

I wonder if Oliver Sacks may include him in an update to one of his books?

Might as well put a Kumar thread to good use. Do you know what eventually happened to his Awakenings patients? Did they all eventually die without ever coming back out of the statue state?

 

[Rolfe]

Do you know what eventually happened to his Awakenings patients? Did they all eventually die without ever coming back out of the statue state?

If you're talking about the encephalitis lethargica outbreak in the 1920s then yes, I'm afraid so, the last of them died fairly recently. They do have a handle on the cause now, and think they can prevent the same thing happening to others if it is diagnosed in time.

Rolfe.

 

[Donks]

If you're talking about the encephalitis lethargica outbreak in the 1920s then yes, I'm afraid so, the last of them died fairly recently. They do have a handle on the cause now, and think they can prevent the same thing happening to others if it is diagnosed in time.

Rolfe.

Yep, thanks for the info.

 

[Kumar]

I think you enjoy TTTT. Can be possible due to much pressure on your head & God/Nature may not be with you.

Anyway, I already said "Bye bye to TTTT" & thinking to say "Good bye" to it but unable to decide as yet.

Better just discuss to add.

 

[Donks]

I think you enjoy TTTT.

I wouldn't end up in TTTT if you were here to debate honestly. But since you are here to outright LIE then I don't really give a crap what you want to happen with your threads.

ICan be possible due to much pressure on your head & God/Nature may not be with you.

Nope. It's because you are a liar. You are dishonest. You are intellectually bankrupt. You are not here to learn. You are not here to debate. You are not here to contribute. You are not here to "help humanity" or any of the other claptrap you spout. And stop bringing god into discussions. I could not possibly care less what you think about any god no matter how much I try.

Anyway, I already said "Bye bye to TTTT" & thinking to say "Good bye" to it but unable to decide as yet.

Better just discuss to add.

If you want to add, then stop lying.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Yeah, come to think of it, lately we have caught Kumar in a couple of straight lies, like the one about the insulin types. Nothing new in that, except, he used to be more careful. Like only lying on other forums about the support he got here.

Actually, that was one lesson he learned rather quick, when I posted there and exposed him (he called it "backbiting ).

Seems everthing about Kumar is very context-dependent:

His learning abilities are highly variable.
His literacy is highly variable.
His ability to apply logic is highly variable.

... His grasp of reality, OTOH, is invariably sketchy .

Hans

 

[Kumar]

TTTT/TTT

Yeah, come to think of it, lately we have caught Kumar in a couple of straight lies, like the one about the insulin types. Nothing new in that, except, he used to be more careful. Like only lying on other forums about the support he got here.

Actually, that was one lesson he learned rather quick, when I posted there and exposed him (he called it "backbiting ).

Seems everthing about Kumar is very context-dependent:

His learning abilities are highly variable.
His literacy is highly variable.
His ability to apply logic is highly variable.

... His grasp of reality, OTOH, is invariably sketchy .

Hans

Overestimations. Reality=Absoluteness. If no absoluteness, no reality. How I can grasp.

Are we getting more anaerobic metabolism nowadays effected by modern lifestyle & environment? How lactic acid can effect pH changes in IC/EC compartments? Can these pH changes be a reason to IR?

OR

What modern lifestyles, crowded big cities effects & polluted environment etc. is doing to our bodies which is causing epidemic spread of many diseases(Say; Modern Epidemic of Diseases/MED)?

 

[MRC_Hans]

Re: TTTT/TTT

Overestimations.

Not at all. You are a proven liar.

Reality=Absoluteness.

Reality is absolute, yes. As a matter of definition.

If no absoluteness, no reality. How I can grasp.

Reality is always absolute, it is only our grasp of it that is not. Yours is especially far from being it.

Are we getting more anaerobic metabolism nowadays effected by modern lifestyle & environment? How lactic acid can effect pH changes in IC/EC compartments? Can these pH changes be a reason to IR?

OR

What modern lifestyles, crowded big cities effects & polluted environment etc. is doing to our bodies which is causing epidemic spread of many diseases(Say; Modern Epidemic of Diseases/MED)?

Already answered.

Hans

 

[Perpetual Notion]

Anyway, I already said "Bye bye to TTTT" & thinking to say "Good bye" to it but unable to decide as yet.

Wolf!! Wolf!!

Ah, yes. The six week threat. I figured we were due for one of them. These threads are just like an American soap opera. You can go away for two years and when you come back, Brooke is still pregnant with Tad's baby.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

You can go away for two years and when you come back, Brooke is still pregnant with Tad's baby.

But is Brooke still a woman? We should be told!

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

Kumar, translate the following;

When all things should have been corrected by following something different and all other things are corrected or remain corrected by following something different except one which was also followed by routine, what a person will think about that routine? If dynamic, will he try to find problems in that routine or not? This much knowlege can make a dynamic person to understand, what is wrong, what is right or what can harm & what not. So just try to find what is wrong in that routine esp. when that couldn't yet be understood completely-- to help him, help you or t

 

[Perpetual Notion]

But is Brooke still a woman? We should be told!

Only the bottom half Stay tuned!

 

[Donks]

Wait, so Brooke is an person which regularly changes gender, and has been pregnant for over 2 years? Sounds like American soaps are a lot more interesting than what I was led to believe.

 

[Kumar]

Re: Re: TTTT/TTT

Not at all. You are a proven liar.

Over-reaction or underesimation.

Reality=Absoluteness.

Reality is absolute, yes. As a matter of definition.

Reality is always absolute, it is only our grasp of it that is not. Yours is especially far from being it.

I will then accept your words as it is, when those will be real in above sense till then one can be open.

To the topic:-

Whether prospective/predisposed diabetic2/IR patients are usually, occasional, irregular & excess eater? Are they predisposed to the habit of occasional, irregular & excessive craving of eatables esp. carbs?

 

[Donks]

What "over-reaction orunderesimation"? You lied. Plain and simple. What is the point of answering any of your questions if you will just lie about the answers, pretend the answer you got was the answer you wanted?

 

[Kumar]

What "over-reaction orunderesimation"? You lied. Plain and simple. What is the point of answering any of your questions if you will just lie about the answers, pretend the answer you got was the answer you wanted?

It may be your wrong estimation but still, If you feel/find like that, really, then you may not awnser. But just avoid TTTT.

 

[Donks]

It may be your wrong estimation but still, If you feel/find like that, really, then you may not awnser. But just avoid TTTT.

Show me how I'm wrong. I said "there are no absolutes in scienece" and you said I "wanted to suggest" everything in science was absolute. Where is my "wrong estimation"? An honest person would apologize for misunderstanding. An arrogant twit would ask me to stop TTTT.