Plume in Flight 93 photo is different

Is the plume in this photo from Flight 93 crashing?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 129 90.8%

  • No.

    Votes: 13 9.2%
  • Total voters
    142
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hotdogbun over at LC keeps saying to Killtown that he doesn't think the image is faked. Killtown is barely able to contain himself, as he was doing over here. Also, Hotdogbun is a moderator at the LC Forum. Seems capable of rational thought, at least in one area. Maybe we should pursue him.
 
Question for moderators, is it forbidden to debate over Val McClatchey's "End of Serenity" photo if assuming it's real and she is not implicated in any sinister plot?
 
So moderators, it's ok to debate over Val McClatchey's "End of Serenity" photo if assuming it's real and she is not implicated in any sinister plot?
 
there's nothing to debate on that photo. its real and she isn't in on any "sinister" plot. YOU have caused this woman a great deal of misery and problems, for which she did not ask for. YOUr persecution of her is wholy without merit, vulgar, and immoral. YOU owe her a public apology for the aggravation you have caused her; I bet now, she wished she had never taken that picture that day.
 
Bell said:
Killtown, ask the mods to close this thread as well.
Click to expand...

This thread has run his course and is gaining you nothing. So it would only be logical to ask it to be closed. Just like your feeble Reagon thread.
 
Yes, because I'm sure you guys don't want threads to show how ridiculous your "plume grew to 7 football fields wide" theory is!
 
Anti-sophist said:
The plume. I've looked at this for a grand total of 0 seconds, but even I accept your conclusion that the plume was 7 football fields wide, why am I to believe that is impossible?
Click to expand...
It's my conclusion the plume would have to be that big if it originated anywhere near the crater. Is it impossible to get? Based on the official story (plane burrowed underground with 5,500 gal of fuel and didn't burn grass around the crater), I conclude yes.
 
I see nothing in your blog that concludes that a 700 yard plume, in diameter, is impossible. I see nothing that says a 7 mile plume, in fact, is impossible.

Do you have any analysis to show that the plume that you claim is shown in that photo is impossible?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom