Plume in Flight 93 photo is different

Is the plume in this photo from Flight 93 crashing?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 129 90.8%
  • No.

    Votes: 13 9.2%

  • Total voters
    142
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, I'm gagged from talking about that for the time being. Sorry, didn't know JREF was into gagging.
Here's the deal killtown. Stop being a coward. If you've got a claim of wrongdoing, of anything illegal, stop being a sniveling coward and go to the police or file a civil lawsuit. Posting your BS on Internet forums instead shows me you are a coward who is afraid having himself exposed as a fraud.

Prove me wrong, coward, put up or STFU.
 
Here's the deal killtown. Stop being a coward. If you've got a claim of wrongdoing, of anything illegal, stop being a sniveling coward and go to the police or file a civil lawsuit. Posting your BS on Internet forums instead shows me you are a coward who is afraid having himself exposed as a fraud.

Prove me wrong, coward, put up or STFU.
Which police should I forward it to?
 
Which police should I forward it to?
Take your pick.

Stop being a coward. If you've got a claim of wrongdoing, of anything illegal, stop being a sniveling coward and go to the police or file a civil lawsuit. Posting your BS on Internet forums instead shows me you are a coward who is afraid having himself exposed as a fraud.

Prove me wrong, coward, put up or STFU.
 
Killtown, we have been asked by moderator Darat to discontinue this discussion (seen here). I don't know if you're baiting me or what, but this is clearly a direct violation of his request.

To everyone, we need to drop this for now. I will not respond further until the matter is resolved. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
As I stated very clearly in my other warning this subject is out of bounds for the time being. Since Killtown decided to ignore my warning he is at least suspended for the time being. I will consider whether he will be re-instated or banned alongside considerations of what to do about his various unsubstantiated allegations. (I have also deleted his last repsonse in this thread.)
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
It's just worth noting that in this forum, reasons for a thread being suspended are clearly communicated, along with open communication of suspensions, and lots of careful hand-wringing over possible bans. Kind of sets a good example, doesn't it?
 
Umm, Mack, don't know how to break it to you, but Darat is a Guy...:eek: :D

Fixed.

In an attempt to foster a more equalitarian society, I use "his" and "her" interchangably in indeterminate situations. No disrespect was intended.
 
Fixed.

In an attempt to foster a more equalitarian society, I use "his" and "her" interchangably in indeterminate situations. No disrespect was intended.

A science fiction writer I like uses ve, vis and ver for the gender non-specific pronouns.

As in:

Ve is going over there to speak to ver about vis computer.
 
A science fiction writer I like uses ve, vis and ver for the gender non-specific pronouns.

As in:

Ve is going over there to speak to ver about vis computer.

Are they on board a Nuclear Wessel?
 
Would this be something you'd be interested in?
well, Having selected a picture from my library and entered into the Editting features of this program, I see it can do the following:

Rotate the picture left
Rotate the picture right
Refect (creates a mirror image)
red eye /pet eye removal
Image cropping
Color effects (color tinting):
B&W effect
Aqua effect
Lighting filters:
Adadptive lighting
Cooler lighting
Warmer lighting
Enhancement options:
restore faded color
Noise reduction (smooths speckled areas)
Improve quality of low resolution photo


The plug-ins available are only for putting the images on a dvd, stuff like that. There is some stuff for making album pages, sharing photos online, etc.


Speaking as someone who has been doing a great deal of image manipulation in the last 2 weeks (making special effects for a movie) I do not see any feature of this software that would allow someone to 'add' anything to their photos, or even manipulate their photo to any degree higher than rudimentary enhancement. No alpha channels, no layering, no brushes or hand altering effects, no real editting or altering of a photo whatsoever can be achieved with this program.

From above mentioned thread, by Hotdogbun@ LC.
 
Last edited:
i love how they keep on saying its a faked pic, but if any of them bothered to FREAKING take the image into photoshop, you could clearly see that it isn't.

I've been working with Photoshop since version 2.0. I've studied every "chop" made, even at that worth100 site that holds those chop contests. You can see, if they bothered to check, that many chops leave "fragments" behind and alterations. That photo is not chopped in anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom