Plume in Flight 93 photo is different

Is the plume in this photo from Flight 93 crashing?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 129 90.8%
  • No.

    Votes: 13 9.2%

  • Total voters
    142
Status
Not open for further replies.
Even better, the pic he put up at loose change is one he photoshopped, not Val's actual pic (or it was last time I was able to view that thread).

And no one has mentioned that.

Not only do they not make any critical remarks, not one of them has gone to see if this is even the picture in question, or verified it's source.
 
Even better, the pic he put up at loose change is one he photoshopped, not Val's actual pic (or it was last time I was able to view that thread).

And no one has mentioned that.

Not only do they not make any critical remarks, not one of them has gone to see if this is even the picture in question, or verified it's source.

Could you please show the picture KKKilltown has Photoshoped, next to the real picture?

I have a LC account, as yet unused, but i love to use that account to show them this (and get banned, obviously).
 
Could you please show the picture KKKilltown has Photoshoped, next to the real picture?

I have a LC account, as yet unused, but i love to use that account to show them this (and get banned, obviously).

I can't currently, because I can't access the thread. That thread requires login now, and my account is gone :)

However, you can find Val's pic at her website (which I can't find the address of) or at this news article.

I'll see if I can get into Loose Change to show the pic he has there.
 
I can't currently, because I can't access the thread. That thread requires login now, and my account is gone :)

However, you can find Val's pic at her website (which I can't find the address of) or at this post-gazette.com/pg/06218/711239-85.stm

I'll see if I can get into Loose Change to show the pic he has there.

I think you mean the picture in KKK's thread ( s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=12355 ) ? Yes, that is Photoshopped. But that was the point of that thread. KKK asked in an other thread if the nutters could come up with their own 'fake' photo. He then used that to illustrate his own lill poll to ask if the original was a fake. How sad, no?
 
I think you mean the picture in KKK's thread ( s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=12355 ) ? Yes, that is Photoshopped. But that was the point of that thread. KKK asked in an other thread if the nutters could come up with their own 'fake' photo. He then used that to illustrate his own lill poll to ask if the original was a fake. How sad, no?

Ah, okay. You may be right, I assumed it was the same thread :) Same point stands, though, in that thread they were treating it as Val's actual photo.
 
Anyhow, I decided to troll them anyway, using the picture of the WTC crash Pardalis showed (see above). Atleast KKKilltown now has one of his 'hunt the Boeing' questions answered.

s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2462&st=0&#entry7172505
 
Translation: "Why don't you come over to a place where the moderators will ban anyone who doesn't agree with me on everything I say instead of this place where the principles of free speech is acutally equal to all and not just me."

Congratulations Fire, you speak fluent CTist.
 
If anybody still wants to debate Val's Flight 93 plume photo, come on over to LC ...

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?act=idx


I'm done with this forum with useless moderators.

No. All the homework has been written down here and there's no point in everyone doing it over again on 'your' site just to get the same stonewalling and lame arguments from you. You go and peddle your stuff to those folks over there. From the lack of critical thinking I saw when I visited last night, I'm sure those people will be just the sort that will buy your ***** hook, line and sinker. Then you can go back to feeling warm and fuzzy inside as you surround yourself with a cavalcade of idiots.
 
If anybody still wants to debate Val's Flight 93 plume photo, come on over to LC ...

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?act=idx

I'm done with this forum with useless moderators.
Yes, please return to your safe haven with its "useful" moderators. The level of debate there may have sunk to your comfort zone by now.

Pity you couldn't understand anything I tried to explain to you. I did my best to be thorough, and to keep it at no higher than a second-grade level. Of course, if you really had any interest in research or learning, you could have asked me to clarify. Ah well, your loss.
 
This happened very recently:

On August 13, 2006, at 1820 coordinated universal time, a Lockheed L-100-30, 7T-VHG, was destroyed when it collided with terrain following a high-rate descent from 24,000 feet in Piacenza, Italy. The pilot, copilot, and flight engineer were fatally injured. The cargo flight departed Algiers Airport (DAAG), Algiers, Algeria, and was destined for Frankfurt Airport (EDDF), Frankfurt, Germany.

According to the Agenzia Nazionale per la Sicurrezza del Volo (ANSV), the flight crew was in contact with Milan air traffic control personnel when the airplane departed cruise flight at 24,000 feet. Contact with air traffic control was lost at 13,500 feet. The airplane continued its high-rate descent until it collided with terrain.
A fairly large plane. A rapid descent. And someone's just sent me a picture of what they saw next.



Looks familiar, doesn't it?
 
This happened very recently:


A fairly large plane. A rapid descent. And someone's just sent me a picture of what they saw next.

(picture removed, as I can't post links yet)

Looks familiar, doesn't it?

I find it very suspicious that the picture is so blury. I guess that would make Photoshopping in the cloud would be more easy [/sarcasm]
 
Obviously, the NWO faked this new crash and detonated ordance for the smoke plume, because Killtown was getting too close to the Truth.
 
For anyone who is interested in comparisons, the L-100 is a civilian variant of the C-130 Hercules.

C-130:
Length: 29.8m
Wingspan: 40.5m
Empty: 34,927kg
Max take-off: 70,307kg
Fuel: 28,540kg
Max Speed: 329 Kt
Cruise: 300 Kt

Boeing 757:
Length: 47.32m
Wingspan: 38.05m
Empty: 57,180kg
Max take-off: 115,680kg
Fuel: 43,490 litres
Max Speed: ??? Kt
Cruise: Mach 0.8

I think it's safe to say if a C-130 can make that sort of bang, a 757 can.

-Andrew
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom