• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ongoing Adventures of Kyle Rittenhouse

Lt. Michael Byrd has been served with a 'wrongful death' lawsuit by the Ashli Babbitt family for his killing an unarmed woman despite there being no immediate threat or danger to his own life. In other words, she was assassinated by a Federal agent.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/evaluating-police-shooting-ashli-babbitt

Michael should sue her back for putting him in a position that required him to have to take a life. He could add in the cost of the bullet just to be thorough.

Seriously though, keep me posted on how that turns out. I bet it gets laughed out of the court room, and Babbitt's family ends up paying Byrd's lawyer bill.

Meanwhile, Kyle is considering writing a book about his ‘unorthodox journey into adulthood’ according to his spokesperson.
"He’s a goofy, charming, pragmatist with a very unique, but optimistic, worldview," David Hancock told NEWSWEEK.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tenhouse-book-kenosha-wisconsin-b1987511.html

LoL like the bulk of people who support Kyle can read. He better make it a picture book. Maybe a pop-up book!

Speaking of stupid lawsuits, I noticed Kyle hasn't filed anything. I'm sure he's just building up all of his evidence.
 
"He’s a goofy, charming, pragmatist with a very unique, but optimistic, worldview," David Hancock told NEWSWEEK.


Translation: "He's a stupid teenaged punk but I'm his spokesperson so I have to pretend to like him"
 
Rittenhouse went on Fox to beg for money to sue media organizations. He naturally went on Tucker's show because the two are made for each other:

"Me and my team have decided to launch The Media Accountability Project as a tool to help fundraise and hold the media accountable for the lies they said and deal with them in court," Rittenhouse said on Monday's "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

So he has a team, but they need money. He's looking at suing politicians and athletes, Whoopi, etc. He also said he's going to sue people that called him a white supremacist and I think he mentioned The Young Turks guy too.

He seems to think he'll walk away rich. I don't know much about the law but it seems to me having an opinion on an opinion show would allow enough wiggle room to not get in trouble. I'd expect he'll get the same thing as Sandmann, some "go away" money. Maybe enough to get another AR and a few years at lifeguard school.
 
Found a Newsweek article with some lawyers explaining how he doesn't have a case, and a reply from a lawyer\host from TYT show. It wasn't behind a paywall for me. A few highlights:

Adrienne Lawrence, an attorney and host on The Young Turks media network, tweeted: "Did someone call Rittenhouse a 'convicted murderer'?

"Because, to my knowledge, you can be a murderer factually, even if you're legally acquitted. An acquittal doesn't really change that one murdered another."

Barbara McQuade, a University of Michigan law professor and former U.S attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, said: "A defamation case is unlikely to succeed here against any defendant."

"By inserting himself into the civil unrest in Kenosha, Rittenhouse voluntarily became a limited purpose public figure, which subjects defamation claims against him to the actual malice standard."
 
Rittenhouse went on Fox to beg for money to sue media organizations. He naturally went on Tucker's show because the two are made for each other:



So he has a team, but they need money. He's looking at suing politicians and athletes, Whoopi, etc. He also said he's going to sue people that called him a white supremacist and I think he mentioned The Young Turks guy too.

He seems to think he'll walk away rich. I don't know much about the law but it seems to me having an opinion on an opinion show would allow enough wiggle room to not get in trouble. I'd expect he'll get the same thing as Sandmann, some "go away" money. Maybe enough to get another AR and a few years at lifeguard school.

There's definitely a fortune to be made, but not through winning lawsuits. Grifting Carlson fans seems like a good way to make a quick buck. Hell, he could probably just drop the pretense and ask them for cash directly. They love this killer, they'd probably just send money as a gift with no strings attached.
 
There's definitely a fortune to be made, but not through winning lawsuits. Grifting Carlson fans seems like a good way to make a quick buck. Hell, he could probably just drop the pretense and ask them for cash directly. They love this killer, they'd probably just send money as a gift with no strings attached.

Which isn't too far from what he's doing, I'd bet. Ripping people off is just another way of saying "fundraising" when it comes to most things the right does.
 
Rittenhouse went on Fox to beg for money to sue media organizations. He naturally went on Tucker's show because the two are made for each other:



So he has a team, but they need money. He's looking at suing politicians and athletes, Whoopi, etc. He also said he's going to sue people that called him a white supremacist and I think he mentioned The Young Turks guy too.

He seems to think he'll walk away rich. I don't know much about the law but it seems to me having an opinion on an opinion show would allow enough wiggle room to not get in trouble. I'd expect he'll get the same thing as Sandmann, some "go away" money. Maybe enough to get another AR and a few years at lifeguard school.

When he got his bail back as it was donated to him why is he hurting for money already, did he really blow through the more than a million dollars already?
 
Found a Newsweek article with some lawyers explaining how he doesn't have a case, and a reply from a lawyer\host from TYT show. It wasn't behind a paywall for me. A few highlights:

Just about everything said about Rittenhouse was an opinion based on disclosed facts, in this case the video of him gunning down protestors and the later trial.

Opinions on disclosed facts are not defamation. QED.
 
When he got his bail back as it was donated to him why is he hurting for money already, did he really blow through the more than a million dollars already?

I don't think that's true, per the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

Under the agreement, $920,000 will be paid, in trust, to Richards & Dimmer, the Racine law firm that defended Rittenhouse. Another $925,000 will go to #FightBack Foundation. Schroder, who posed with Rittenhouse soon after he was released on bail, gets back $150,000 he contributed.

I don't think the FightBack Foundation Inc. has anything to do with Rittenhouse. So I don't think he got any of it.
 
Never mind, Plague311 already posted this:
When he got his bail back as it was donated to him why is he hurting for money already, did he really blow through the more than a million dollars already?
Whoever posted it gets it back.

I donated $100 toward bail for that poor cook at the Little Rascal's Daycare that had been accused of Satanic ritual abuse of the kids. Her lawyer contacted me to ask if that was bail money I expected to get back or was it a donation she would keep. It was a donation.

NY Post
Bond in Wisconsin legally goes back to whoever posted it after the trial is over, which would appear to be Pierce’s law firm.

A second attorney who briefly worked on the case, L. Lin Wood, said the funds were provided by his FightBack Foundation and should be returned to the organization, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.

In February, the Rittenhouse family fired Pierce, and have since complained that he and Wood diverted money meant to help Rittenhouse.


Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
At a short hearing Friday, Judge Bruce Schroeder approved two deals — one, agreed to by Rittenhouse, was to let authorities destroy the rifle; the other was to divvy up the $2 million bail with actor Ricky Schroder and a Texas non-profit organization led by Atlanta lawyer Lin Wood.

Under the agreement, $920,000 will be paid, in trust, to Richards & Dimmer, the Racine law firm that defended Rittenhouse. Another $925,000 will go to #FightBack Foundation. Schroder, who posed with Rittenhouse soon after he was released on bail, gets back $150,000 he contributed.

The judge denied an 11th-hour attempt by a California-based hedge fund trust to claim the bail money. The trust claims to be the assignee of a litigation financing company that was owed millions of dollars by Rittenhouse's first attorney, John Pierce of Los Angeles, and had obtained judgments against him.

The trust claimed its right to all assets of Pierce's firm and business entities included the bail, since he posted the $2 million with a check from his firm's account.

Rittenhouse's attorney, Mark Richards, argued Friday the money was wired to Pierce's firm from #FightBack, and went through Pierce's client trust account, so the money would never be subject to liens by business creditors.

In an affidavit, the trust's officer in charge of recovering assets from Pierce also claimed that despite Pierce's huge debt, the trust decided to contribute $300,000 to Rittenhouse's bail as an investment.

It doesn't look like Rittenhouse got any of it.
 
Last edited:
Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski
Kyle Rittenhouse today says he may sue Biden if he doesn’t apologize to him: “I tried reaching out to him 5 times to have an interview but he was too cowardly to sit down and talk to me.”

There’s nothing more patriotic than a white supremacist double murderer suing the President of the United States during the most volatile international crisis since World War II because he’s desperate for attention.
 
I literally highlighted the part that I don't believe. Here it is again.

webfusion said:
I have witnessed it first-hand at a local Walmart. These 'shoplifters' don't have a care in the world; after loading up their shopping carts, they just push 'em right out the door, looking at the paying customers with an air of contempt and a smirk.

I don't believe any of this.

I recognize it though: It's precisely the same rhetoric used to describe the classic "welfare queens" that load up their shopping carts with steak and lobster, pay with food stamps, and smirk at the paying customers on the way out, before departing in a Cadillac. It's always a Caddy.
 
Last edited:
I recognize it though: It's precisely the same rhetoric used to describe the classic "welfare queens" that load up their shopping carts with steak and lobster, pay with food stamps, and smirk at the paying customers on the way out, before departing in a Cadillac. It's always a Caddy.


Yes, people do walk into stores and brazenly shoplift. They know that the security guard will probably not try and physically stop them due mainly to liability concerns, not the law.


Try these


You see gangs of people in stores doing this now simultaneously. All the employees can do is hope none of them are violent and watch them steal.


What this has to do with Kyle I don't know.
 
Yes, people do walk into stores and brazenly shoplift. They know that the security guard will probably not try and physically stop them due mainly to liability concerns, not the law.


Try these


You see gangs of people in stores doing this now simultaneously. All the employees can do is hope none of them are violent and watch them steal.


What this has to do with Kyle I don't know.

Examples I saw related to shoplifters targeting small, high value items. Where are the "loaded shopping carts"?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom