Moderated Obama birth certificate CT / SSN CT / Birther discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparantly, Orly went to a $500 a ticket fundraiser for Newt.

After suggesting that the birther issue would be a boost to his campaign, she stated: "Somebody who wouldn't be good enough, who wouldn't be certified to pick tomatoes or clean bathrooms is sitting in the White House."

Newt responded: "That's a project you should pursue."

LOL


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 6875388815_6a18b4c244_o.jpg
    6875388815_6a18b4c244_o.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 527
and Orly is denied again in GA..her failure to follow the rules of the court is becoming easy guess work:

ORDER Denying Taitz's Motion for pro hac vice

The majority of the required information set forth above was not included in the Motion for Pro Hac Vice of Ms. Taitz as required by Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.4(E)(1). Moreover, the Motion included no Verification affirming that the applicant read the application, was knowledgeable as to its contents, and that said contents were true. The Motion also failed to demonstrate, through proof of service, that it would be served upon the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia in accordance with Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.4(D).

Farrar, et al. v. Sarack Obama, et al.
Civil Action No. 2012CV211398
Order Denying Motion for Pro Hac Vice
Page 2

Lastly. the Motion did not include the name, Georgia Bar license number, or signature of an
attorney licensed to practice in the State of Georgia who will also be acting as counsel of record in this litigation.
 
Last edited:
Ah yeah, KBOA did say she was going to file - which apparently included dragging a sheriff with her to Washington DC, but we never heard anything about it until now.

As for Orlana, I wonder if there's any news from LA about a massive shriek that suddenly hit the area last night... :rolleyes:
 
Classic Orlana Taitz in Indiana today. She didn't even have time to open her yapper before she was warned by a state ballot commissioner, that any misrepresentation could be referred for criminal prosecution.

And it all went downhill from there, including getting into a shouting match with the commission, having her 'zibits' eviscerated, and finally unanimously denied.

It was a thing of beauty to behold.
 
a work-in-progress transcript has mostly kindly provided by a member of the fogbow: http://bleachandlight.blogspot.com/2012/02/orly-does-indiana.html

ms. Riordan: Thank you, mr. Chairman. I've reviewed these materials, and actually they're not 300 pages of sworn testimony. There are several unnumbered pages of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which is a so-called legal document that you drafted, no grounds for admission, 100 percent hearsay. And then we have several pages of typed transcript, which i've read some of, and it's actually pretty ridiculous, but again, 100 percent hearsay, inadmissible, and there are a number of other many illegible documents, totally unclear where they came from, whether they were printed off the internet or just some random other source. Nothing that is appropriately before the commission. There's been no personal authentication or certification or any reason put forth why this body should be taking the public's time to even review these documents for a minute. And so with that, i would ask that unless there's any more discussion, i'd like to call the question on the motion to deny the admission of this evidence so that we can move forward to looking at this on the merits.

ouch!
 
"Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help, help, I'm being repressed!"
 
I liked this part:

MR. DUMEZICH: Whoa, whoa. Let's stop. Stop right there. Present your case. We're not covering anything up. We're allowing you to speak your mind and putting it before the commission. If you're disrespectful like that one more time, your butt's going to be gone. You got that?
 
Looks like Philip Berg is at it again, and with what I think has to be one of more amusingly redundant arguments I've seen:
Evidence points to the fact the Candidate, at the time of birth, was named Barack Hussein Obama, born at Coast Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya located in Coast Province. The Candidate's father was a Kenyan citizen and his mother a United States citizen who was not old enough and did not reside in the United States long enough to register the Candidate's birth in Hawaii as a "natural born" United States citizen
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82987884/2012-02-23-PA-BERG-v-Obama-Primary-Ballot-Challenge-186-MD-2012
 
Orly's latest on the Georgia case:

orly taitz
February 28th, 2012 @ 4:42 am
written like a true Obot. any attorney knows, that what was written by Jablonski is a copmplete garbage and BS. It will be dismissed, if the judge is as corrupt as Malihi and other puppet judges. A lot of corrupt judges belong in prison with Obama. The judge is a liberal Democrat, she will decide for Obama no matter what
 
Even more interesting is that Orly is apparently going to spend $10,000 to have 49 copies of the GA hearing records certified. All because she was told by the Indiana election commission that her exhibits were useless since they weren't certified.
 
Even more interesting is that Orly is apparently going to spend $10,000 to have 49 copies of the GA hearing records certified. All because she was told by the Indiana election commission that her exhibits were useless since they weren't certified.

Because 50 copies would obviously be excessive? Or is it because she plans on using the copies in suits in the other 49 states? (nevermind the fact that she's missing the point altogether)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom