NIST releases final report on WTC7!!!!

LastChild said:
debunkers can't wait for the WTC7 report and whatever it says, as they have accepted it before even seeing it. They know it will somehow support their insane notions of global collapse of a steel constructed high-rise for the first time in history from something that has never caused it before, and therefore somehow in their mind proves there was nothing more to 9/11 then what the powers that be tell them. Their faith in authority confirmed.

debunkers love to bow.
Click to expand...
actually im sure i will end up accepting it because im sure that, regardless of the cause, NIST will figure it out
 
Can you guys try not to quote LastCHild. It's really annoying. It's not like he is going to make a contribution to a discussion. He is just upset that all his cute little conspiracy theories have all been proven wrong and so the best he can do it make an issue out of the time of the WTC 7 report to compensate for his complete lack of any report what so ever form his conspiracy tabloids.

So what's taking the conspiracy tabloids and the cons at ae911truth.org so long to come up with a report that supports their claims? It's been 7 years right? How much longer do we have to wait for them to prove a controlled demolition? NIST already released their report on WTC 1&2, yet Gage and Jones an them are still empty handed.

But of course a little kid who doesn't even understand the basics of a microphone probably wouldn't be smart enough to notice that.
 
Jonnyclueless said:
Can you guys try not to quote LastCHild. It's really annoying. It's not like he is going to make a contribution to a discussion. He is just upset that all his cute little conspiracy theories have all been proven wrong and so the best he can do it make an issue out of the time of the WTC 7 report to compensate for his complete lack of any report what so ever form his conspiracy tabloids.

So what's taking the conspiracy tabloids and the cons at ae911truth.org so long to come up with a report that supports their claims? It's been 7 years right? How much longer do we have to wait for them to prove a controlled demolition? NIST already released their report on WTC 1&2, yet Gage and Jones an them are still empty handed.

But of course a little kid who doesn't even understand the basics of a microphone probably wouldn't be smart enough to notice that.
Click to expand...

As Griffin pointed out, Truthers don't need a coherent counter-theory.
 
Apollo20 said:
Sure I worked for the Ontario Government through my job at OPG and back in 1983 I, and many others, were charged with the task of investigating the pressure tube rupture in Pickering Unit 2. And we were given a budget and we had a deadline. And I had to deliver whatever I could within those restraints. My annual performance appraisal was based on how well I met the milestones that were set for my assigned projects. And I had to issue a PROGRESS REPORT every 3 months. That's why I'm amazed at the BS at NIST!
Click to expand...

Apollo20, did the report time and budget get increased when extras were added onto tasks? NIST was pressured into analyzing 'blast events'. That is one add-on that I am aware of. I don't know if would fully justify the increased time but it is one cause.
 
i really wonder why it takes so long. most JREFers have figured that out since years now, but NIST still not done yet?
why dont NIST asks the real experts on JREF?
like beachnut^^
 
You do realize that NIST has already ruled out any kind of explosive devices right?

And kind of funny comment considering that the truthers 7 years later don't even have a paper on WTC 1&2 let alone 7, where the only argument is "It looks like a CD".

Yes, forgive us for not needing NIST to debunk "It looks to me like a CD". The laughter you hear when that claim is made can be considered NISTs response as well.
 
Apollo20 said:
In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are given a budget and a deadline to produce a report.
Click to expand...
Do NTSB investigations into an civilian passenger jet crash have a fixed deadline? Or do they go on as long as there are avenues of investigation to pursue?
 
Jonnyclueless said:
You do realize that NIST has already ruled out any kind of explosive devices right?

And kind of funny comment considering that the truthers 7 years later don't even have a paper on WTC 1&2 let alone 7, where the only argument is "It looks like a CD".

Yes, forgive us for not needing NIST to debunk "It looks to me like a CD". The laughter you hear when that claim is made can be considered NISTs response as well.
Click to expand...

And how exactly did they rule that out?

and oc you dont need NIST to make your counter theorys.

but i can only hardly imagen the new NIST FAQ.
16) Why is the collapse of WTC7 looking like a Controlled Demolition?

ROFLMAO
Click to expand...
 
Dictator Cheney said:
And how exactly did they rule that out?
Click to expand...
The whole "no evidence" thing.

eta: I think they answer this question on their FAQ, not sure though.
 
Last edited:
Dictator Cheney said:
they ruled it out without any evidence?
Click to expand...

They have found no evidence of controlled demolition.

Question for you. How did they rule out high energy weapons? How did they rule out Bigfoot tearing down the towers?

eta: Do you happen to have some evidence of controlled demolition?
 
Last edited:
Dictator Cheney said:
they ruled it out without any evidence?
Click to expand...

I suspect you are not serious or you are not a native English speaker.

They ruled it out because there was no evidence.

They looked, they found no evidence, they ruled it out.

Does a unicorn live in your bathroom cabinet? You can either rule it out because it is a ludicrous idea or you can look to see if there is evidence. Is there a unicor in your cabinet now? Are there unicorn droppings on your bathroom floor? Are there hoof-marks around the toilet bowl indicating a unicorn has recently been drinking from it?

If there is no evidence, you can rule it out.

See?
 
gc051360 said:
They have found no evidence of controlled demolition.

Question for you. How did they rule out high energy weapons? How did they rule out Bigfoot tearing down the towers?

eta: Do you happen to have some evidence of controlled demolition?
Click to expand...

i have no evidence oc for a CD. Just a bunch of indications.

btw, when KingKong was not able to bring down ESB i doubt that bigfoot is able to bring down WTC7
 
gtc said:
I suspect you are not serious or you are not a native English speaker.

They ruled it out because there was no evidence.

They looked, they found no evidence, they ruled it out.

Does a unicorn live in your bathroom cabinet? You can either rule it out because it is a ludicrous idea or you can look to see if there is evidence. Is there a unicor in your cabinet now? Are there unicorn droppings on your bathroom floor? Are there hoof-marks around the toilet bowl indicating a unicorn has recently been drinking from it?

If there is no evidence, you can rule it out.

See?
Click to expand...

sometimes investigators are looking for something and cannot find evidence. while exeryone knows, the accused is guilty.

When Al Capone and other Mafiosis are able to keep evedence hidden. im pretty sure that a corrupt group inside Gov Agencys are able to do the same.
 
ahhh, I see. Well let's hope if you are ever accused of a crime, such standards are applied to you.

DC: "But you have no evidence, how can you convict me?"
Judge: "Well I don't like you, and I am rebellious and paranoid, so I find you guilty anyway!"

TAM;)
 
T.A.M. said:
ahhh, I see. Well let's hope if you are ever accused of a crime, such standards are applied to you.

DC: "But you have no evidence, how can you convict me?"
Judge: "Well I don't like you, and I am rebellious and paranoid, so I find you guilty anyway!"

TAM;)
Click to expand...

well im sorry but i do indeed belive that Al Capone was guilty for things they never was able to prove.

maybe i have a wrong inpression and Al Capone was an honorable man :)
 
Maybe when

When Nancy Lieder tells why Planet X didn"t hit the earth in 2003? Or maybe when David Icke says that Boxcar Willie was not a reptile?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom