NIST releases final report on WTC7!!!!

[T.A.M.]

Curious, who tasked NIST with the report on WTC7? Was it requested by the USG? Did anyone ask them to cover it? Was it an after thought?

Not sure? Don't seem to recall.

TAM

 

[Mr. Skinny]

I think it's pretty weak that NIST appear to have carte blanche over its much promised and long delayed WTC 7 Report.

In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are give a budget and a deadline to produce a report. What's so special about WTC 7?

And please I don't want to hear that old cliche, "well NIST just want to do a good job and do it right!

I thought you had done work for the government before, Apollo.

Really, this one made me chuckle a bit.

 

[Bobert]

It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.

The sound of a broken record.

 

[pomeroo]

It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.

Wow! Should I inform Arthur Scheuerman that his paper defies the laws of physics? Nah, he wouldn't believe you.

 

[Par]

Many of my questions go unanswered, but I'm not obnoxious about it and follow people around other threads.

You seem to have fallen foul of the “Two wrongs make a right” fallacy: Even if some of your questions do go unanswered, it doesn’t follow that you are justified in not answering those put to you. Further, it’s a perfectly straightforward and pertinent question. Going over to the aforementioned thread and answering it would only seem reasonable.

 

[Bobert]

I think it's pretty weak that NIST appear to have carte blanche over its much promised and long delayed WTC 7 Report.

In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are give a budget and a deadline to produce a report. What's so special about WTC 7?

And please I don't want to hear that old cliche, "well NIST just want to do a good job and do it right!

Have you asked NIST all of these questions?

 

[Garb]

I think it's pretty weak that NIST appear to have carte blanche over its much promised and long delayed WTC 7 Report.

In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are give a budget and a deadline to produce a report. What's so special about WTC 7?

And please I don't want to hear that old cliche, "well NIST just want to do a good job and do it right!

So if the investigation is not finished, they should just give up and finish the report as-is?

Would the 9/11 truth movement want their investigation to just give up if they don't make the deadline they expected?

 

[Apollo20]

Sure I worked for the Ontario Government through my job at OPG and back in 1983 I, and many others, were charged with the task of investigating the pressure tube rupture in Pickering Unit 2. And we were given a budget and we had a deadline. And I had to deliver whatever I could within those restraints. My annual performance appraisal was based on how well I met the milestones that were set for my assigned projects. And I had to issue a PROGRESS REPORT every 3 months. That's why I'm amazed at the BS at NIST!

 

[T.A.M.]

I think the original tasking of the NIST group was the collapse of the WTC1/2. I was curious if WTC7 was considered part of the initial tasking, or if it was something NIST decided to do independently afterward?

TAM

 

[LastChild]

When?

Oliver you are cruel.

Teasing all the pathetic Nistians waiting with bated breath for something more to worship no matter what it might claim.

Cruel. But funny!

Good Job!

 

[pomeroo]

Oliver you are cruel.

Teasing all the pathetic Nistians waiting with bated breath for something more to worship no matter what it might claim.

Cruel. But funny!

Good Job!

You have, of course, solved the problem by rejecting anything inconvenient to your fantasies without reading it.

 

[T.A.M.]

truthers do not even care about the WTC7 report, as they have rejected it on principle, regardless of what it concludes. They know it will not support their insane notions of controlled demolition, and therefore must be wrong...

TAM

 

[LashL]

Sure I worked for the Ontario Government through my job at OPG and back in 1983 I, and many others, were charged with the task of investigating the pressure tube rupture in Pickering Unit 2. And we were given a budget and we had a deadline. And I had to deliver whatever I could within those restraints. My annual performance appraisal was based on how well I met the milestones that were set for my assigned projects. And I had to issue a PROGRESS REPORT every 3 months. That's why I'm amazed at the BS at NIST!

Are you sure that those working on the WTC7 report are not issuing progress reports within the NIST? During your 20+ years working for the government, were your progress reports published to the general public?

And as for you having to "deliver what you could" within the constraints of your budget and time deadline on the Pickering project, was it really the case that everyone on the team had to put their pencils down on a pre-ordained date or when the pre-ordained budget was exhausted, whichever came first? This is a serious question, as it seems inconsistent with most government projects (which typically go over budget and take longer than initially forecast).

In any event, would you really prefer that those working on the WTC7 report simply say, "Well, it's June 30, folks, here's what we've got so far, this will have to do" ?

 

[LashL]

truthers do not even care about the WTC7 report, as they have rejected it on principle because they are unprincipled, regardless of what it concludes. They know it will not support their insane notions of controlled demolition, and therefore must be wrong...

TAM

Very true. (With that one minor change... )

 

[LastChild]

truthers do not even care about the WTC7 report, as they have rejected it on principle, regardless of what it concludes. They know it will not support their insane notions of controlled demolition, and therefore must be wrong...

TAM

debunkers can't wait for the WTC7 report and whatever it says, as they have accepted it before even seeing it. They know it will somehow support their insane notions of global collapse of a steel constructed high-rise for the first time in history from something that has never caused it before, and therefore somehow in their mind proves there was nothing more to 9/11 then what the powers that be tell them. Their faith in authority confirmed.

debunkers love to bow.

 

[pomeroo]

debunkers can't wait for the WTC7 report and whatever it says, as they have accepted it before even seeing it. They know it will somehow support their insane notions of global collapse of a steel constructed high-rise for the first time in history from something that has never caused it before, and therefore somehow in their mind proves there was nothing more to 9/11 then what the powers that be tell them. Their faith in authority confirmed.

debunkers love to bow.

Conspiracy liars love to, well, lie. I can't quite recall how you connected the collapse of WTC 7 to your imaginary conspiracy's scheme to conquer the world. Could you refresh my memory?

Oh, while you're exercising your creativity, you might want to tell us about the other buildings that have been hit by tons of debris from a collapsing skyscraper. You can do that, right? You wouldn't want to give the impression that you're nothing more than an empty-headed weasel, would you?

 

[Bobert]

Oliver you are cruel.

Teasing all the pathetic Nistians waiting with bated breath for something more to worship no matter what it might claim.

Cruel. But funny!

Good Job!

BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
WRONG!
Nice try there LC!
You can have your bait back.

You are aware that there are PLENTY of people on this board who are not happy with the US government, right?
BUT that does not translate to mean that I/we think that 9-11 was an inside job.
I have a feeling that for example Ron and I have different political views but guess what!!!!
TRUTHERS ARE INSANE!
So..........
I VERY MUCH supported the Green Party UP UNTIL they began to associate with truthers.
Its funny to see truthers try and "infiltrate" groups like anti-war activists and the anti-war crowd turns and tells the truthers to F-off.
Nice try with the bait though LC.

 

[T.A.M.]

Bobert:

It is only natural for a small group of failed activists, such as the truthers, to try to infest groups that are better at it (activism that is). There are leeches in the activist world as well you know.

TAM

 

[applecorped]

debunkers can't wait for the WTC7 report and whatever it says, as they have accepted it before even seeing it. They know it will somehow support their insane notions of global collapse of a steel constructed high-rise for the first time in history from something that has never caused it before, and therefore somehow in their mind proves there was nothing more to 9/11 then what the powers that be tell them. Their faith in authority confirmed.

debunkers love to bow.

Quote restored. Do not change other member' quotes.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

Your turn!

 

[CHF]

debunkers can't wait for the WTC7 report and whatever it says, as they have accepted it before even seeing it. They know it will somehow support their insane notions of global collapse of a steel constructed high-rise for the first time in history from something that has never caused it before, and therefore somehow in their mind proves there was nothing more to 9/11 then what the powers that be tell them. Their faith in authority confirmed.

Or maybe it'll support the notion that WTC7 was the first ever silent demolition, or the first ever demolition using thermite.

Hell, maybe the report will come right out and proclaim what twoofers like you think but are too chicken to say: "the FDNY was lying about the damage WTC7 sustained!"

But I doubt it.