• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NIST releases final report on WTC7!!!!

The day after McCain wins the election, because their real job is figuring out the best ways to make twoofers even more paranoid. :p
 
Drudgewire said:
The day after McCain wins the election, because their real job is figuring out the best ways to make twoofers even more paranoid. :p
Click to expand...
the irony is if its just going to be another whitewash like the WTC1+2 report why are they taking so long? i mean if the NCSTAR was such an obvious fabrication clearly the american public will swallow whatever the government feeds them, so why so long with the WTC7 report? just say "fire did it" slap in some pictures and publish



....unless of course they are actually doing an investigation
 
Let's hope there's a youtube version otherwise no one in the TM will ever know what it says.
 
It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.
 
RedIbis said:
It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics...
Click to expand...
LOL, that explains why after seven years twoofers still haven't gotten past the "just asking questions" stage. :p
 
RedIbis said:
It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.
Click to expand...

Got a cohesive 9/11 theory ready for us?
 
RedIbis said:
It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.
Click to expand...


(Incidentally, RedIbis, there’s a question for you in another thread: In what way was Silverstein telling the Fire Department what the best plan would be (even if that was what he was doing) an example of him lying? This is around the fifth time that I’ve put it to you.)
 
RedIbis said:
It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.
Click to expand...


So, you’re essentially saying: Whatever the report says, it will be wrong.
 
RedIbis said:
... defy the laws of physics .../quote]
lol, not a clue what the laws are in the 9/11 truth camp. that was funny

[truther] it fell faster than freefall [/truther]

if the truth movement understood physics, there would be no truth movement

11.2 Gs comes to mind…

the leader "experts" of 9/11 truth say 9/11 defies the laws of physics, fail to prove it, and follower parrot the meaningless false mantra...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I think it's pretty weak that NIST appear to have carte blanche over its much promised and long delayed WTC 7 Report.

In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are given a budget and a deadline to produce a report. What's so special about WTC 7?

And please I don't want to hear that old cliche, "well NIST just want to do a good job and do it right!
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't imagine its a very high priority since no one was killed and it poses no future safety risks. I would like to think they are spending more of their resources on more important things than WTC 7.
 
Apollo20 said:
I think it's pretty weak that NIST appear to have carte blanche over its much promised and long delayed WTC 7 Report. In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are give a budget and a deadline to produce a report. What's so special about WTC 7?And please I don't want to hear that old cliche, "well NIST just want to do a good job and do it right!
Click to expand...


Well, “Objects with mass attract each other” is also, I suppose, something of a cliché, but I don’t know what you think follows from that.
 
RedIbis said:
It takes time to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.
Click to expand...
dont truthers claim the explanation posed on the WTC1+2 report defy the laws of physics? why should NIST put extra effort into 7 when apparently its only arousing more suspicion?
 
Apollo20 said:
I think it's pretty weak that NIST appear to have carte blanche over its much promised and long delayed WTC 7 Report.

In the real world, which is apparently not where NIST resides, investigators are give a budget and a deadline to produce a report. What's so special about WTC 7?

And please I don't want to hear that old cliche, "well NIST just want to do a good job and do it right!
Click to expand...

While it does have downfalls in that the investigation can go on too long and get deeper and deeper until it's pointless, having carte blanche is better than being underfunded and only given a few weeks to do it and expecting the job to be done properly. Really when you get down to it,apart from CTs and Debunkers, who esle is actually waiting for this report?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom