DanishDynamite
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2001
- Messages
- 10,752
Rick Maue said:Greetings,
But the room prices as a "serious concern" have not been eliminated. You simply admitted that your price was too high due to the fact that you were a late arrival. Simply put, there is no place with a wider range of room rates than Las Vegas, especially when you add in all of the other benefits that exist there.
It's possible that you are correct, and that no other place in the US has as cheap rates for hotel rooms as Las Vegas. Well, at least any place with a large convention room. But I doubt it. Hutch has already posted a few suggestions for a new venue. I think it would be worthwhile to investigate these suggestions further.
Sorry. I'll get right on it.As for other concerns, why haven't you addressed any of the things that I said in my earlier posts?
Firstly, the tremendous variety in regard to food, entertainment, activities, etc, have already been enjoyed by those who attended an earlier TAM. So nothing enticing there.To refresh your memory, I said:
In order for some other US city to match the price that is possible in Vegas (including airfare, hotel, meals, etc...), the attendees would have to give up a large number of the things that Vegas offers (including tremendous variety in regard to food, entertainment, activities, etc). And do not forget that Vegas also offers connections to some very influential people that assist in many ways with the event.
Secondly, is the purported connections to very influential people essential for a TAM? If so, how? And if these influential people support TAM, is there some reason they can't support it somewhere else?
I've re-read it. I've also questioned it's significance in regard to Las Vegas being the venue.(Please read that last sentence again. In fact, read it twice if necessary since it was ignored the first time it was posted. And if you do not believe that this is a big deal, who will step up to the plate and replace those "connections"--especially on the financial side of the equation?)
Agreed.TAM is about what is best for the event, and what is best for JREF. After all, it is the once-a-year fund raising event for the organization. With that said, let those that work so hard to make everything happen decide what is best.
I disagree. I want TAM to be a success. Some people have already attended one or more TAMs. Such people are already on Randi's side and most have intimate knowledge of what the speakers will say. They are already part of the "choir", so to speak.Sure, it is fine to discuss other options, but I believe that the vacation-club attitude is rather self-centered.
I for one, enjoyed the speakers, but I didn't learn anything really new. I would appreciate if there was some additional reason for "prior-attendees" to attend again. And I don't think I'm the only one.
And if it turns out that no other venue is possible, so be it. I'm just not sure I'd attend. And I want as many people to attend as possible.Please realize that I understand what you are saying--and I sympathize. However, when it comes to organizing an important event such as TAM, the personal vacation desires of certain individuals are simply not as high on the priority list as other things--such as overall cost, solid business connections, convenience for the organizers, after-hours activities, etc...
I'm saddended that you think this way. You seem to imply that I don´t care about the TAM, when the reverse is true.To be honest, the most encouraging thing about this poll is that as of the date for this post, there are only a few dozen people that have voted. Considering the size of the crowd at TAM3, I can only assume that most of the attendees simply care more about the event than their own vacation plans.