[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

ahhhhh some critical thinking skills emerge from the over active imagination of a CT'er.

Now, take a deep breath and apply those same skills to your own witness testimony......

Oh I have.

And you will too.

Most eyewitnesses make mistakes, deduce, and some even lie.

But the nature of the claim, credibility of the witness, and level of corroboration all play HUGE roles on what is acceptable.

Lets just say we've got a hat trick.
 
I'm not the one that will convince you.

The testimony will.

I have been working on it every day and will present it as soon as possible.

Hate to break this to you, but if it's taking you this long to get some witness testimony into a form which will be convincing to the public at large, you're trying too hard.

If it's watertight it will stand on it's own. If you have to spend so much of your time on it, it's going to be torn to pieces.
 
I'm not the one that will convince you.

The testimony will.

I have been working on it every day and will present it as soon as possible.

You didn't address the substance of my post. Nice attempt at skating, but please either address it directly or admit that you cannot or will not.

For ease of reference, it was as follows:

You don't have the "technical expertise" nor the "equipment" to put forward a simple explanation or precis of the earth shattering evidence that you claim to have?

How much effort would it take to simply describe it in your own words on the internet forums that you are spending your time on? It seems to me that it would take very little effort, and it seems to me that if you have the time to hang around on the internet rather than working on acquiring or working on the "technical expertise" you cited above, well, then you should have enough time to explain and describe your alleged earth shattering evidence instead of just dancing all around it.
 
Surely you don't need any of this lightpole nonesense, as you have the attack authorisation signed by Bush himself.
 
This is all you could dig up?
Pardon me? I asked you how many of those people you had interviewed. Forget about the anonymous admiral. Steve Riskus, as you know, has his contact info on his photo page.

So what did he tell you, Lyte? And what did the others who mention the plane knocking down the light poles tell you?

You did speak to them, right? Because this is about the light poles and you obviously would have spoken with the people who specifically mentioned them being knocked down in their accounts, right?

So what did they say? Start with Steve Riskus. We're ready.

And for the third time, did Father McGraw say the plane that flew right over him didn't hit the Pentagon?
 
I didn't read much of this thread since the last two pages, but let's just get one thing straight.

A plane did hit the Pentagon, right Lyte?
 
Surely you don't need any of this lightpole nonesense, as you have the attack authorisation signed by Bush himself.

I was so happy that you made it home safely the other day as you were obviously in fear for your life, was this due to having said article? Is it in more than triplicate now? I'd get it to as many as possible incase I'm "suicided".(hate that word)

Hey, why not post it here Lyte? We'll look after a copy for you.

Better safe than sorry.

You guys do realize how much people that are sarcastic in person are loathed right?

I wonder why this seems to be the pervasive communication method of choice with regulars here?

I would never have subjected myself to this forum and the repugnant levels of smarmy self righteousness if I didn't have something rock solid.

Same with that post about my safety.
 
I don't know why you're engaging Lyte over the poles issue.

He has claimed to have the Bush sig' on the order to carry out the 9/11 attacks.
 
Better safe than sorry.

You guys do realize how much people that are sarcastic in person are loathed right?

I wonder why this seems to be the pervasive communication method of choice with regulars here?

I would never have subjected myself to this forum and the repugnant levels of smarmy self righteousness if I didn't have something rock solid.

Same with that post about my safety.

What? You realy fear for your life because you don't have evidence that Bush was behind 9/11?

:dl:
 
Show us the DOC' Lyte.

Or are you just another blowhard, another keyboard warrior, your movement is chock full of guys like that. Are you somehow different?
 
Pardon me? I asked you how many of those people you had interviewed. Forget about the anonymous admiral. Steve Riskus, as you know, has his contact info on his photo page.

So what did he tell you, Lyte? And what did the others who mention the plane knocking down the light poles tell you?

You did speak to them, right? Because this is about the light poles and you obviously would have spoken with the people who specifically mentioned them being knocked down in their accounts, right?

So what did they say? Start with Steve Riskus. We're ready.

And for the third time, did Father McGraw say the plane that flew right over him didn't hit the Pentagon?

I can prove the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

You will have to concede I was right.

This will supercede all of your other questions.

I have no intentions of answering all of anybody's questions here.

I will present information when I am ready.
 
I don't know why you're engaging Lyte over the poles issue.

He has claimed to have the Bush sig' on the order to carry out the 9/11 attacks.

I think that post from LC was sarcasm, it should have been!
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom