• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Miss me? (smiles)

If anyone doubts my belief.

I believe these faces are real .

I believe randi and his associates do manipulate this forum.
If there are doubters to this claim...I would suggest using a trace program and see where it leads back to (and make sure your aware of 'socks, when you do so). Are some of you really that nieve (excuse spelling I know I suck at it) to think they don't? Lol.
Id start with the ones who have post the fewest and who yell the loudest (understand?).

I believe they (faces) manipulate the thinking and feelings of those who are 'not of God.

...and more.


Lyndale.


If anyone cares to contact me by email for fear of ridicule from this forum they may do so I've set up a email address for just this purpose. Here it is [email protected] and I promise to keep all contacts and info from contacts confidential and not back here to this forum.
 
Well evidently they´re not preventing you from voicing these claims about their manipulation of the forum in their own forum. I wonder why they don´t just delete it seeing as how they need to make sure we don´t find out about this conspiracy =)

3 questions you have not answered, answer them:

For what crime will you be suing JREF in your lawsuit?

Who is your lawer and when do you expect to file it?

Where are you from and what is your original language? I am guessing Spanish because of the double negative thing you used earlier which is typical of Spanish.
 
komencanto said:
Well evidently they´re not preventing you from voicing these claims about their manipulation of the forum in their own forum. I wonder why they don´t just delete it seeing as how they need to make sure we don´t find out about this conspiracy =)

3 questions you have not answered, answer them:

For what crime will you be suing JREF in your lawsuit?

Who is your lawer and when do you expect to file it?

Where are you from and what is your original language? I am guessing Spanish because of the double negative thing you used earlier which is typical of Spanish.


"they´re not preventing you...". No not yet and maybe they won't. I believe I may have passed this problem. To do so now would not be in their favor with the rest of you ...I'd imagine.

"For what Crime...". Based on submitting two applications (correctly) and the past history of who they would let (mine is far less crazier then the ones they did let test)...I believe because mine is true, I am being shut out based on prejeduice of truth
(again excuse spelling I know I suck at it).

Who is my lawer (?)...I don't have a lawer...I have an attorney and that is not important to you is it?


I am from kent, ohio. Born in virginia. Decedent of english and indian. I know I abuse the english language n spelling and grammer. (Sorry).

I wouldnt let them test me if it was two million at stake now. I will see this in court before a jury. It will probably be drawn out but thats ok. I have couple of reasons for seeing this go to trial.
One, I know that no amount of proof will sway the heads of this foundation. They dont want to part with their money, that is obviouse. It will be my best chance at a fair trial, regarless of the outcome.
Two, The publicity will reach alot of people and fail or win...people will look and at least know about it on a larger scale. (even if it makes me look even more stupid then you think I already do...it will be worth it) I seriously believe that even if I fail, in the end sooner or later someone somewhere will pick up where I left off and their outcome will be different (which will of course lead me to a new trial against the foundation and probably also allow me to balloon the dollar amount based on the defense of the foundation..because you can will believe they will try and discredit me, by whatever means they can. Soon or later....I will win...its all just a matter of time really.

Lyndale
 
Heres one to chew on.


Even If I don't take it to court. I still win with this foundation.

When I was here before I posted a copy of my notorized agreement, thus proving I did submit, before anyone else did concerning this subject.

Now lets say...that tomorrow...someone somewhere makes it world known what I have been talking about and proves it for me.

Well I was the first to reveal it here...so based on that I could come back and sue from that point of view.

I am not sure if I said that clear enough but I think you get the jest of it.

There are many angles that I can approach this from to win.

Its all just a matter of time really.

Lyndale
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:


"For what Crime...". Based on submitting two applications (correctly) and the past history of who they would let (mine is far less crazier then the ones they did let test)...I believe because mine is true, I am being shut out based on prejeduice of truth
(again excuse spelling I know I suck at it).


Could you give me a quote of that law, I´m not aquainted with it.
In any case, JREF is not required EVER to accept ANY application for ANY reason. If you found something totally provable that was sure to win and everyone accepted, they could quite easily refuse to test you without breaking any law.
What do you say to that?

Who is my lawer (?)...I don't have a lawer...I have an attorney and that is not important to you is it?

Yes, I´m curious about that, what is his/her name and how could I contact him/her? Just out of curiosity, what is the difference between an attorney and a lawyer?


I am from kent, ohio. Born in virginia. Decedent of english and indian. I know I abuse the english language n spelling and grammer. (Sorry).

No need to apologise, I´m just don´t know why you do it seeing as how you live in America. Do you speak any other language?


....dollar amount based on the defense of the foundation..because you can will believe they will try and discredit me, by whatever means they can. Soon or later....I will win...its all just a matter of time really.

Lyndale

I find your reference to this as a foundation hilarious. I mean, it´s a pretty small website, with a pretty small organization, with little publicity, little money (except for the relatively small about for a business sitting collecting interest), a relatively large forum and thats about it.
If JREF closed entirely today it wouldn´t make any sort of news except within circles interested in the paranormal.

I wish I had your confidence about your victory in this =)
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
Heres one to chew on.


Even If I don't take it to court. I still win with this foundation.

When I was here before I posted a copy of my notorized agreement, thus proving I did submit, before anyone else did concerning this subject.


Why is it that the only person in the world who has noticed these faces in digital photos is you?
Digital photos are used by millions around the world, yet you are the first to notice these demons hidden in them. How is this possible?

Now lets say...that tomorrow...someone somewhere makes it world known what I have been talking about and proves it for me.

Well I was the first to reveal it here...so based on that I could come back and sue from that point of view.

What would constitute proof of these claims?
Furthermore, your posts showing your claim could simply be deleted destroying your proof.

I am not sure if I said that clear enough but I think you get the jest of it.

The world is jist, "in jest" is an adverb which means in a humourous or non-serious way.

[/QUOTE]

Some more questions to ponder while I go for a siesta.
 
concerning the above 2 posts.

I answered them already.

If you lack the understanding of what I said. I am sorry. But to repeat only fills space that is wasted and since we are nearing the end of this thread..I'd rather waste it with my dribble then yours. (the difference in lawyer and attorney is the way you first spelled it.(winks).



For those interested in seeing different pictures.

http://photos.yahoo.com/lightpiercingthedark

Lyndale
 
Refreshing

Since we are near the end of this thread...I'd like to end it with this post I posted earlier. Please forgive me, but I want you to really think about this and if this is the last post...I will start a new one should it merit it.

Take care and thanks for your time.

May God Keep us all.

Lyndale








Let me ask each of you this.


It clearly states in the rules of this forum, that there "are" certain words that you had better "not" use. Should you use them it "clearly states you will "not" be here.


I was thinking.

You know that buggy guy "traveller"?

In all his posts, he uses the word ◊◊◊◊. It don't take no rocket scientist to figure out that word, yet he is allowed to use it over and over....by no one doing nothing.......does that mean the word isnt what it implies?

If I used that word and words like them in a slam against randi in a thousand word slam but only like traveller used them.....do you think they would allow me to continue?

Of course not.


My point?


How many times does it take for it to be so?


Just think about that.
 
I stand honerably corrected on the spelling in both counts =)

LPD´s dodging of my questions up there have got me thinking this could all be a big joke. He has no answers and so bluffs claiming that he refuses to answer because the answers are already there, when they are not.

Here are the questions I have asked and I am almost certain are not answered above in this thread:

1. Why is LPD the only person in the world who has discovered the thruth about these demons?

2. How does LPD think he is going to proove these are not simply JPEG artifacts?

3. Why does LPD speak English in the way he does if he is in the USA?

4. What is a quote of that law JREF has broken. I don´t just want a name, I want the actual law.

5. Who is your lawyer/attorney. What is his/her contact information and name?

Answer them when you want. *Sigh*, I´m beginning to feel and idiot for bothering to converse with this brick wall. This thread should be deleted on account of wasting people´s time in a futile task =)
 
komencanto said:
This thread should be deleted on account of wasting people´s time in a futile task =)

It does however increase my post count. I want my avatar!
 
komencanto said:
I stand honerably corrected on the spelling in both counts =)

LPD´s dodging of my questions up there have got me thinking this could all be a big joke. He has no answers and so bluffs claiming that he refuses to answer because the answers are already there, when they are not.

Here are the questions I have asked and I am almost certain are not answered above in this thread:

1. Why is LPD the only person in the world who has discovered the thruth about these demons?

2. How does LPD think he is going to proove these are not simply JPEG artifacts?

3. Why does LPD speak English in the way he does if he is in the USA?

4. What is a quote of that law JREF has broken. I don´t just want a name, I want the actual law.

5. Who is your lawyer/attorney. What is his/her contact information and name?

Answer them when you want. *Sigh*, I´m beginning to feel and idiot for bothering to converse with this brick wall. This thread should be deleted on account of wasting people´s time in a futile task =)



except for 3 I have answered the all the above on some level or another.

and to answer 3. I didnt pay attention in english class.
It's not what we know that makes us smart, its how we know it.

I won't address these issues again. I suggest you re-read and do it s l o w e r this time.

Lyndale
 
Am I blind? I´m pretty sure that nowhere in this thread are there contact details for LPD´s attorney.

Does anything know anything about the law JREF is supposed to have broken? Predjudice of justice doesn´t ring any bells with me.
 
LightPiercingDarkness said:
It's not what we know that makes us smart, its how we know it.
What an interesting concept. Could you give an example?

I'd say rote memorization is less useful than real understanding, but either way you have to "know" the information for it to be of any use.

I won't address these issues again. I suggest you re-read and do it s l o w e r this time.
Might I suggest that if everyone is missing your answers that perhaps they are not the ones to blame?

1. Why is LPD the only person in the world who has discovered the thruth about these demons?
Well, it seems pretty clear that some people can see something in his pictures. So I think the real question here is why is LPD's explanation for what they are new and/or paranormal.

2. How does LPD think he is going to proove these are not simply JPEG artifacts?
One assumes he would try with other compression algorithms and no compression at all. Well, ok, that's not what he'll do, but that's how to you would. Even at that I think it's missing the point, which is that it's "demons" vs. brain hardwiring as an explanation.

3. Why does LPD speak English in the way he does if he is in the USA?
Large portions of the country have poor school systems, and even the best schools have poor students. I think it fairly clear that LPD did not do well in school, the possible reasons are left as an exercise for the reader.

4. What is a quote of that law JREF has broken. I don´t just want a name, I want the actual law.
I have also requested this (he did not respond to me). As far as I can tell he seems to think that it's some sort of patent situation where he is documenting a discovery so that he has prior art for a patent when more information is available. I'm not sure if this is legally valid as correct for patent law, but it's the only thing I can come up with that begins to explain his comments.

5. Who is your lawyer/attorney. What is his/her contact information and name?
I suspect he doesn't have one, as his grasp of the law appears somewhat lacking. And no, he didn't answer this anywhere other than to assert he had an attorney (and apparently get confused or annoyed by a mispelling of "lawyer," which is rather ironic)

So here's my prediction (note Lyndale, this also doesn't qualify for the million): Lyndale will continue to rant without adding significant content for another couple weeks, he will then fade away, to reappear in months or years repeating his same unchanged mantra. No lawsuit will ever be filed, nothing will ever come of his claims, he will remain convinced that he will be vindicated at some unspecified later date by some unspecified breakthrough.

Feel free to prove me wrong, LPD.
 
Komencanto,

I think you need to understand, LPD really doesn't believe he can win any of this in court. It is either another one of his indulgent fantasies, or he is just trying to vocalize and make a dent against this organization, which of course he never will with any of his claims.

As to why he is the only one in the world who sees demons in the pictures, I think it is because he thinks he is... "The One". I'm sure he believes he has been chosen to be the only one in the world to see these things, and to spread the word to those who will follow, so that they may see as well. So they may have their eyes opened to the truth and the light.

He will only reply to people who aggress him with compassion, angering some, and confusing others. Basically it's a certain form of passive-aggressiveness. He may not feel the same way inside as he appears when he replies.


LPD,

do you care to answer to any of my posts I made? I think the first one I made had some valid arguments and points that you should consider... that is unless you have closed your mind off to any other possibilities. Read my signature. "Don't determine what is impossible until you know all the possibilities." That still applies to you as well. You can't just determine that it is impossible that you are wrong, and that these demons do not exist, unless you understand all of the possibilities that go with it. I have, and everything points to simple JPEG anomalies, which are completely understandable. And like I said before... if you try to, you can find dozens of ANY object in those pictures, not just faces. Faces are just the first thing we recognize when we notice things in patterns. Simple human nature. Think about it.... If you will not respond to me here, maybe I'll just email you at your new email domain. This is more convenient though. Anyway, even though I understand human nature and psychology pretty well, you still confuse me.

Dane
 
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but you have to wonder, just what will those words be?

I have a new question: Who else believes this besides you. Anyone? Who have you told about these things in real life? Has anyone else agreed with you ever? How many people have you told about this?
 
komencanto said:
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but you have to wonder, just what will those words be?

I have a new question: Who else believes this besides you. Anyone? Who have you told about these things in real life? Has anyone else agreed with you ever? How many people have you told about this?


Regardless the answer you will assume that the reply will be in my favor.
So here you fill in the answers................................ .

Lyndale
 
Concerns for Lyndale's health

Dane,

Another sign that Lyndale is not very decompensated is his capacity to ignore challenging questions, and to not follow up on his stated promises.

We see that healthy persons are good at ignoring unhealthy and invalid challenges. Randi, for example, has the healthy and beneficial habit of ignoring spurious claims and manipulations.

So it's actually healthy for Lyndale to ignore the consequential questions and obligations of his own spurious fantasies and comittments. Or he'd really be in trouble.
 
Re: Concerns for Lyndale's health

Prolix said:
Dane,

Another sign that Lyndale is not very decompensated is his capacity to ignore challenging questions, and to not follow up on his stated promises.

We see that healthy persons are good at ignoring unhealthy and invalid challenges. Randi, for example, has the healthy and beneficial habit of ignoring spurious claims and manipulations.

So it's actually healthy for Lyndale to ignore the consequential questions and obligations of his own spurious fantasies and comittments. Or he'd really be in trouble.



You have more faces then a deck of cards.


Lyndale.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom