• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Merged]Play-by-Play: Debate between Kevin Ryan and Michael Shermer

Afterthoughts:

Shermer did a very good job. Not perfect, but very good. He needs to think a little harder about his audience and tailor his responses based on that. This was not a History Channel audience, this was an Air America audience.

Ryan was miserable, repeating the usual talking points. That said, it is quite possible that some were swayed.

Dealing with the blizzard of "facts". Having had to go through this a couple times myself, I have an idea. If you're debating one of the Truthers, have a checklist in front of yourself so you can tick off the bits of woo that they're spewing at you. That way, when it's your turn you aren't trying to remember all the things they said while simultaneously debunking. That is, under the general heading of "WTC-7" you could have the following:

1. Not hit by a plane.
2. Steel-framed buildings never collapse.
3. 6.5 seconds.
4. Own footprint.
5. Limited fires.
6. Countdown.

etc. I don't think any of us would have any problem debunking any of those individual points, the key is remembering them all while you're trying to respond.
 
Hartmann engages in quite a bit of woo with the "I don't believe in the CTs" callers. Steel shipped to Korea? Nope.
 
Abby: "....thermate dripping out of the tower before it collapsed....Steven Jones found the thermate"

Agh, she's listing out all the taking points ....

"the videos of the collapses are the evidence....all the towers came down the exact way". No they didn't.

Hartman: And I don't disagree.
 
Callers:

1. Pro Ryan. Says Ryan was so good. What? Was he listening?

2. Pro Twoofer. Missing videos at Pentagon.

3. Non Twoofer: HARTMANN WON'T LET HIM TALK! OVERRIDES THE CALLER. Caller says Bush took advantage only, no pre-planning.

4. Pro Twoofer: All steel shipped off. Hartmann agrees.

5. Pro Twoofer: Molten metal, thermate, Jonesy brought up. Trying to bring up EVERYTHING in 30 seconds. Reading from script. Hartmann lets HER talk because she is woo, like him.

6. Pro Twoofer: Videos of buildings is the evidence, all that is needed. Slams Shermer. Hartmann supports.

7. Pro Twoofer: Bill Maher infiltrator, giving web site, looking for cheap exposure. Hartmann wishes her the best, approves.

8. Pro Twoofer: Ownership of WTC. Brings up insurance.

Hartmann is absolutely a 9/11 twoofer, despite his claim that he is on the fence. No - he is NOT. All of the above callers who were PRO TWOOFER, Hartmann let them talk, essentially uninterrupted. The one who got through and was a NON TWOOFER? Hartmann stepped all over him.
 
Last edited:
As one who had forwarded Thomm's requests for a debate to this group, I am completely disappointed in the way he ran it. I posted a message to that effect in his chat group. He has listener call-ins in the third hour and so far they are all parroting Twoofer talking points. I think it's over and not one Truther called got on air, if they didn't leave out of disgust.

If you are so motivated, you can leave a comment via this URL.

http://www.airamerica.com/thomhartmannpage/feedback

In the past , I have asked for citations for claims made on-air and gotten fact-based answers back. I believe he will see the messages.

I posted on the chat board a statement that Shermer was able to respond to only one point after Thomm plus Ryan had spouted 10.
 
Matthew Best said:
Wow. Listening to American radio is annoying - it's about half and half content and ads or promo spots for other stupid-sounding radio shows. I don't know how you guys stand it.
Click to expand...

It's because they have really BAD marketing people and thus cannot sell ad time.

I tend to listen to the network I actually helped found, Head On Radio Network.

Try the Bob Kincaid show from there.

He is a decent fellow and does NOT think 9/11 was an inside job, though he does think that elements of the government ignored indications that could perhaps have prevented it. But that is incompetence, not conspiracy.
 
Brainster said:
Afterthoughts:

Shermer did a very good job. Not perfect, but very good. He needs to think a little harder about his audience and tailor his responses based on that. This was not a History Channel audience, this was an Air America audience.
Click to expand...

Just to defend the truth, I suggest we work on a response, maybe this list and put a link for a specific answer to each one. I'll cut and paste it on his blog.
 
LTLK says they are the "the voice of reason", translates to "the source of woo". Painful stupid stuff as "truth" = "lies" for 9/11 truth, and KTLK.

Hartmann is a truther full of woo.
 
Last edited:
BigAl said:
Just to defend the truth, I suggest we work on a response, maybe this list and put a link for a specific answer to each one. I'll cut and paste it on his blog.
Click to expand...

A list of the actual points Ryan (and Hartmann) raised, or all the possible points? If it's the former, we'll presumably be able to download the MP3 soon and put together a transcript.
 
First off, I didn't hear the callers, except for the last one.

However, If I were someone unfamiliar with this topic. I would say that Kevin Ryan came out on top. He managed to hold the microphone for the greatest amount of time throwing out speculation while Shermer sat back listening politely. When Shermer had the mic, he didn't ask for evidence and then doggedly demand that it be presented.

Frankly, I think a show like this is a poor venue for the likes of Shermer. The format is too broken up by commercials; the show is only one hour long, and it's a call in show on top of that; and Shermer is just too polite to jump in a cut off his opponent, thus allowing him to sow too many seeds of doubt while at the same time, not being asked for much in the way of evidence.
 
If you want to see a really pathetic attempt to rebunk one of Shermer's solid arguments, check out this ridiculous post at 9-11 Blogger. George Washington (real name: Alex Floum) is something of a fathead, but this is doltish even for him. Talking about Top-Down (really Impact Point Down) versus Bottom Down:

While this may be considered demolition from the "top" of the building, if -- instead -- we imagine that the top is comprised of a 30-story high building, the demolition would actually proceed from the bottom of that building.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 
Brainster said:
If you want to see a really pathetic attempt to rebunk one of Shermer's solid arguments, check out this ridiculous post at 9-11 Blogger. George Washington (real name: Alex Floum) is something of a fathead, but this is doltish even for him. Talking about Top-Down (really Impact Point Down) versus Bottom Down:



:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Thats the stuff Stundies are made of...
 
Brainster said:
If you want to see a really pathetic attempt to rebunk one of Shermer's solid arguments, check out this ridiculous post at 9-11 Blogger. George Washington (real name: Alex Floum) is something of a fathead, but this is doltish even for him. Talking about Top-Down (really Impact Point Down) versus Bottom Down:

While this may be considered demolition from the "top" of the building, if -- instead -- we imagine that the top is comprised of a 30-story high building, the demolition would actually proceed from the bottom of that building.
Click to expand...


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

oh...oh...ohhhhhh :lolsign::lolsign::lolsign:

ohhh kaaaay

Yes, it ('trutherism') is drugs/mental illness coupled with a pathological need to lie.
 
I was going to send Shermer some stuff on Ryan but didn't get around to it. I haven't listened yet (thanks, Ben), but from what I read here it sounds like he didn't need it on the whole. Glad they didn't restrict the topics to collapse issues. Disappointed that Hartmann falls for nonsense that's spouted by incompetents and liars.
 
While this may be considered demolition from the "top" of the building, if -- instead -- we imagine that the top is comprised of a 30-story high building, the demolition would actually proceed from the bottom of that building.
Click to expand...

Right. And if we imagine that normal CDs are performed on buildings that are upside down, then all demolitions are top-down!
Or is it top-up?
Wow! Imagining stuff is fun!

I missed the live feed, and haven't been to the site -- is there an Air America forum? I'd be interested in knowing how the response is going there (although I can probably guess.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom