May Stundie Nominations

Travis said:
I should point out that the Concorde thing seems to be part of a satire to help dubunk the Trieste Hoax nonsense.
Click to expand...

That's the problem with satire. you can't outcrazy the crazies.

Many people still think "Gulliver's Travels" is a travelogue.
 
Dave Rogers said:
A clear and categorical description of a detailed property of a device that doesn't exist, that violates just about every physical law I can think of (because, if Jammonius's implication is to be taken at face value, this suggests that steel only partially dustified by his imaginary magic beam will continue to dustify, in defiance of the Law of Conservation of Energy - and once that one goes, the whole of physics collapses), combined with a suggestion that another imaginary magic process be used to counteract the first?
Click to expand...

Consider further that they melted down this steel and recast it as part of the ship. One might think there would be some serious risks to that, what with this DEW contamination causing the on-going dustification and all. Jammonius must also know something about the rate of decay involved. Since he is concerned about the continued existence of the ship itself, we can assume the rate to be on the order of decades, rather than, say millenia. :rolleyes:
 
Blue Mountain said:
If the shuttles are fake, how did they build the ISS (which can be seen by amateur astronomers on the ground) and get new instruments on board Hubble? And why has not even one so-called "astronaut" come forward to a newspaper with the proof of the hoax of the century?
Click to expand...

And just what makes you think the Hubble is really up there, huh? :p
 
Blue Mountain said:
If the shuttles are fake, how did they build the ISS (which can be seen by amateur astronomers on the ground) and get new instruments on board Hubble? And why has not even one so-called "astronaut" come forward to a newspaper with the proof of the hoax of the century?
Click to expand...


One Word: Inflatable Balloons.


Wait, sorry, no, that should have been: Inflatableballoons.
 
grandmastershek said:
http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=sRj3r0fBppI
Click to expand...

Creative and new. Perhaps you can ask why it is we hear a car backfire when unburned fuel combusts in the muffler. (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_does_a_car_backfire) Or mention that the outer tube surely has to at least be intact in order to bounce back the sound waves?

I'm still trying to figure out the Schrodinger thing. I've never seen Schrodinger's equation mentioned in regard to 9/11 before - surely he can provide a linky?
 
Elizabeth I said:
And just what makes you think the Hubble is really up there, huh? :p
Click to expand...
now he's moving the goal posts. his revised theory applies to all tubular designs (because we have to somehow rationalize wtc 7) and the windows would have bounced the sounds of detonations back into the building.
 
Minadin said:
That thread is a heck of a read, but it's from 2008. It still qualifies for the stundies, though, if it hasn't been nominated before, right?

Travis? Can we get a ruling on this?
Click to expand...

This comes up every month. Anything not nominated before is fair game regardless of date.

Stundies are about the thought processes involved, not breaking news.
 
Minadin said:
That thread is a heck of a read, but it's from 2008. It still qualifies for the stundies, though, if it hasn't been nominated before, right?

Travis? Can we get a ruling on this?
Click to expand...

Yeah. I don't recall anyone ever nominating it before so it is okay. Since we're taking from other websites there is no real time frame restrictions.
 
grandmastershek said:
now he's moving the goal posts. his revised theory applies to all tubular designs (because we have to somehow rationalize wtc 7) and the windows would have bounced the sounds of detonations back into the building.
Click to expand...

Dear God. Nominate that as well!
 
Immunity for all Government Employees... Just don't vote for them!

MolecularPhD said:
P.S. I had a conversation yesterday with a friend of mine in the justice department; I made a suggestion to him to allow for the release of this evidence; he thought what I purposed was interesting; below is my proposal to congress.

I purpose that we grant amnesty to anyone involved that is directly Employed by our Government either foreign or domestic; and hold them harmless both criminally and civilly; and if any evidence were found that shows that anyone working within our government had direct knowledge of or was directly involved in the events of 9/11 would have complete and total immunity.

This would accomplish few things:

#1: Free up all evidence collected for release to the public

#2: Would End the Argument that the evidence is a matter of National Security

#3: It would show who, when, and how they had knowledge so the public could make a proper decision to vote for them the next election season (if anyone within the Government had prior knowledge).

and last but, not least; it would put an end to any and all so Called "Conspiracy Theories" imagined or otherwise once and for all.
Click to expand...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread570510/pg5#pid8812330
 
Last edited:
This has to be a contender - 911thology's explanation to djlunacee of how we know there were nuclear explosions on 9/11.

djlunacee said:
911thology said:
If you were a real innocent reasonable person who is familiar with elementary logic you would not miss to notice 3 important things (which have nothing to do with me personally, except that I only pointed them out to others):
a)ground zero in pre-9/11 usage was the place of a nuclear/thermo-nuclear explosion and that was the ONLY meaning of this term;
b)Place o the WTC collapse was called ground zero (first in small letters only, then elevated to capital letters after a couple of weeks).
c)US authorities undertook a verily heroic desperate attempt to re-define ground zero term in ALL without any exception post-9/11 dictionaries which is nothing but a smoking gun US Government was caught with.

If combination of the abovementioned 3 points is still not enough proof for you that the WTC demolition had something to do with nuclear explosions, then I am very sorry, we have nothing else to talk.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

If you don't buy the numerological proofs of 9/11, maybe the etymological proof will convince you!

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
This has to be a contender - 911thology's explanation to djlunacee of how we know there were nuclear explosions on 9/11.



If you don't buy the numerological proofs of 9/11, maybe the etymological proof will convince you!

Dave
Click to expand...

So all we have to do is call a place ground zero and then a nuclear explosion will occur.

That's some powerful magic!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom