Loose Change - Part III

[apathoid]

The other thing that should be considered. WHAT IF we are wrong? WHAT IF a plane hit the building as witnesses said? Have you thought about the fact that without any direct knowledge of the people, their lives, what they saw etc. you might be accusing normal innocent human beings with families and jobs of being accessories to murder? Do you care about the implications of that? What if they were just going to work and got stuck seeing something they didn't even want to be a part of. Then have a bunch of strangers on the Internet accuse them of participating in the deaths of fellow Americans and two wars.

The reason I don't post more of my detailed research is because of how it is treated by people with hard core beliefs that can't even explain the basic physical facts of what happened at the Pentagon in light of no-plane. I am very sorry to have shared the cab driver's story here because of the disrespect it was received with. Do you actually think I would share more of my hard work in a monitored intolerant environment? My goal is to get to the truth - not provide fodder for people.

Beliefs can seriously skew our logic at times. It is best to stick with the facts. That will be our only hope of finding out how they pulled 9/11 off.

s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7228

Looks like Russell Pickering from pentagonresearch has just about had it with the Loosers. He is also applying an insane amount of logic for a CT'er in that thread. I dont think its too long before he starts abandoning his beliefs about 911 altogether.

I think he's pretty much convinced that AA77 hit the Pentagon, but thinks it was remotely guided. I just sent him a message in which I told him that if hes's interested, I can explain to him with near 100% certainty that if AA77 hit the Pentagon(as he is sure of), that it couldnt have been by remote. It'll be interesting to see how he takes that......

 

[Gravy]

Now I am not degrading this board right now, just pointing out the obvious, it would happen the same way over at the LC board. Sad really, we are more similar than many of us even know.

Wrong again. At the LC board, evidence and facts get a person banned. Just look at my thread there. I broke no rules and presented facts and logical arguments. That earned me a ban without warning.

Here, facts, evidence, logic, and critical thinking are required. You were challenged to furnish those. You failed to do so. Instead, you choose to troll, then to whine about unfair treatment. That's childish behavior.

So long, Jennabell, and best of luck understanding what truth is.


edit: removed last line.

 

[SBrown]

Wrong again. At the LC board, evidence and facts get a person banned. Just look at my thread there. I broke no rules and presented facts and logical arguments. That earned me a ban without warning.

Here, facts, evidence, logic, and critical thinking are required. You were challenged to furnish those. You failed to do so. Instead, you choose to troll, then to whine about unfair treatment. That's childish behavior.

So long, Jennabell, and best of luck understanding what truth is.


edit: removed last line.

Well that is just great but I do not trust anyone with their explanation of their bans. Look at DavidJames. He went ballistic today calling people uneducated, zero credibility(then saying he gives a rats ass about someones credibility ), called people pathetic little men, and so on. This was after he was already on thin ice for other many other of his "elitist" insults he throws around.

I got a final warning here today for taking someones quote and removing a few words to make it look like gibberish. It was an obvious joke I was making to prove a point (valid or not).

Nothing is black and white, you are not the good guys and truthers are not evil devils. Keep thinking you are the hero in a movie all you want, it does not bother me, nor does it really effect me.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Well that is just great but I do not trust anyone with their explanation of their bans. Look at DavidJames. He went ballistic today calling people uneducated, zero credibility(then saying he gives a rats ass about someones credibility ), called people pathetic little men, and so on. This was after he was already on thin ice for other many other of his "elitist" insults he throws around.

I got a final warning here today for taking someones quote and removing a few words to make it look like gibberish. It was an obvious joke I was making to prove a point (valid or not).

Nothing is black and white, you are not the good guys and truthers are not evil devils. Keep thinking you are the hero in a movie all you want, it does not bother me, nor does it really effect me.

Were you planning on contributing something to the discussion of the 9/11 issue, or were you just planning on complaining about forum moderation?

 

[SBrown]

Were you planning on contributing something to the discussion of the 9/11 issue, or were you just planning on complaining about forum moderation?

Ironic I guess that I ask you the same.

 

[Gravy]

Well that is just great but I do not trust anyone with their explanation of their bans.

And that's a big difference between you and me. I didn't ask you to trust my explanation, I said you could find the evidence in the thread I started on LC. You choose not to do so. And there we have it.

These are your CHOICES, Jennabell. You choose to troll. You choose to ignore all the evidence that's right in front of you. You choose to support dishonest people and the work they create.

 

[SBrown]

And that's a big difference between you and me. I didn't ask you to trust my explanation, I said you could find the evidence in the thread I started on LC. You choose not to do so. And there we have it.

These are your CHOICES, Jennabell. You choose to troll. You choose to ignore all the evidence that's right in front of you. You choose to support dishonest people and the work they create.

How about you show me proof that one thread is the reason you were banned. Why is up to me to dig for something I have no information on? That is simply insane.

DavidJames claims innocence right now, yet it does not take a genius to see he was just being extremely insulting.

 

[Gravy]

How about you show me proof that one thread is the reason you were banned. Why is up to me to dig for something I have no information on? That is simply insane.

DavidJames claims innocence right now, yet it does not take a genius to see he was just being extremely insulting.

It's the only thread I posted on. I started the thread. I wasn't trolling on other threads as you do. See, I made it easy for you. You could also check the thread "Why was Gravy banned?" Rather than do that, you continue whining. Didn't you say you were leaving a few posts ago?

 

[NDBoston]

Was it this one, Gravy?

invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1765

 

[SBrown]

It's the only thread I posted on. I started the thread. I wasn't trolling on other threads as you do. See, I made it easy for you. You could also check the thread "Why was Gravy banned?" Rather than do that, you continue whining. Didn't you say you were leaving a few posts ago?

What are you talking about? If you have one thread over there than provide a link for it. Do you really expect me to go look for it? How long should I search? Give me a break. How about you do some research for me. I need to find a good open source search feature to embed into a web site. How about you go find the one that fits my needs. Thanks.

 

[Gravy]

What are you talking about? If you have one thread over there than provide a link for it. Do you really expect me to go look for it? How long should I search? Give me a break.

Still whining, I see. Rather than using your brilliant research skills, such as selecting my username and choosing "Find all threads started by Gravy," or simply using the site search features, you continue to complain.

You work very hard to ignore evidence, Jennabell. Now, if you're staying here, what about 9/11 would you like to discuss? This is a discussion forum.

 

[Stellafane]

What are you talking about? If you have one thread over there than provide a link for it. Do you really expect me to go look for it? How long should I search? Give me a break...

OK then, provide me a link to where you answered my question about why you post here, and what you hope to accomplish by it. Because certainly, you don't really expect me to go looking for it. Give me a break...

 

[SBrown]

Still whining, I see. Rather than using your brilliant research skills, such as selecting my username and choosing "Find all threads started by Gravy," or simply using the site search features, you continue to complain.

You work very hard to ignore evidence, Jennabell. Now, if you're staying here, what about 9/11 would you like to discuss? This is a discussion forum.

You have really lost touch with reality, or you are just trying to play up to your friends here. How am I able to research your membership when you say it has been banned and deleted?

As for using the search feature, there are a lot of threads that mention your name, you expect me to waste my time searching through all those?

You either expect way to much from people or you are just playing a PR game. That is just too funny.

 

[SBrown]

OK then, provide me a link to where you answered my question about why you post here, and what you hope to accomplish by it. Because certainly, you don't really expect me to go looking for it. Give me a break...

/boggle

 

[Gravy]

You have really lost touch with reality, or you are just trying to play up to your friends here. How am I able to research your membership when you say it has been banned and deleted?

As for using the search feature, there are a lot of threads that mention your name, you expect me to waste my time searching through all those?

You either expect way to much from people or you are just playing a PR game. That is just too funny.

I didn't say anything was deleted, you did.
Now, this is a discussion forum about 9/11. Are you here to discuss that, or are you still trolling?

 

[SBrown]

I didn't say anything was deleted, you did.
Now, this is a discussion forum about 9/11. Are you here to discuss that, or are you still trolling?

WTF? This is impossible. I looked after just to make sure, you have no acount under this name. You ask me to do something then accuse me of trolling because I ask for a link. That is just crazy.

I will be back later, need to go to a movie. If you can provide a link I will look at it and comment. But do not accuse me of being a troll for trying to answer your question.

 

[Pardalis]

Let's talk about 9/11 SBrown. What are the "holes" in the official story (except the ones in the three buildings)?

 

[Gravy]

WTF? This is impossible. I looked after just to make sure, you have no acount under this name. You ask me to do something then accuse me of trolling because I ask for a link. That is just crazy.

I will be back later, need to go to a movie. If you can provide a link I will look at it and comment. But do not accuse me of being a troll for trying to answer your question.

Still whining and refusing to do your homework? I can find the thread with no problem but you can't? I even gave you the TITLE of another thread that linked back to mine. No, it's all a big mystery to jennabell. Must be a conspiracy! Is this how you conduct your investigations into the "truth?"

Pathetic.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1765&st=0

 

[Stellafane]

/boggle

About the answer I expected.

What a pathetic shtick. But keep it up; if I ever run into anyone that gives 9/11 CT'ers even an ounce of credibility, I'll just point them to you as a typical example. That should immediately shame them into repudiating all CT'ers, because no one remotely in their right mind would ever want to be associated with a cause you believe in.

 

[Johnny C.]

It appears that is not possible bob. I thought after reading this that I would see a lot of agreement with you that the games and name calling was getting old I agree(and it can be fun but it really amounts to no progress) but not in the cards I guess. What we get instead is almost a full page of insults, ridicule, challenges and primal chest beating. Now I am not degrading this board right now, just pointing out the obvious, it would happen the same way over at the LC board. Sad really, we are more similar than many of us even know.

Oh well back to the grind.

Dont try to pretend that you want a civilized discussion. You are merely doing that to linger here longer. You cant stand to be away from people that despise you for some odd reason. Reguardless of why you're here, I think you went on for a whole lengthy paragraph about how I lived with my parents, had no social life, played Diablo, and was quite found of my e-penis (your exact words were that I "thrived online"). And all because DJ was oblivious to why people were calling him a moron repeatedly. I smile when I imagine Dj's confused look on his face after getting three simple one word posts consecutively that said "irony".

I find you to be no more sincere when you say you want an end to name-calling then when you say you are on a quest to find the truth.

I will be back later, need to go to a movie.

Thats twice thus far, in the past 3 pages of this thread, that you have told us the personal plans for the evening. Why?