Loose Change - Part III

[Belz...]

My new favorite thread at loose bowels.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7287

Clearly the amateur videos of the 2nd plane hitting the tower are faked

These guys are mad. Clearly mad.

 

[Brainster]

Oohhhhh, the government isn't to blame.
CTers are lame, for the following 281 reasooons.
Everybody now!


Also, they sometimes show up late. Last week I went down at 12:15 and the little poops didn't show up until after one.

99 conspiracy theorists on a wall
with 99 theories how.
If one of those theorists should happen to fall
98 conspiracy theorists on a wall!

 

[Gravy]

I will continue to be a thorn in the side of every CT'er, because the last thing I ever want to live to see, is the capture of a genuine WTC conspirator, followed by a trial where his defense introduce CT tripe in an attempt to get him off.

One ct'er (or a weak minded individual who has heard this stuff) on the jury, and he gets away.

I wonder if that example has ever been proposed to the Loosers. Suppose the US captured one of the 9/11 planners and put him on trial. If a Looser were on the jury, it would mean automatic acquittal, no matter what evidence the government presented. (Ideally it would never come to that, because the Looser's prejudice would be revealed in the voir dire process.)

 

[60hzxtl]

I wonder if that example has ever been proposed to the Loosers. Suppose the US captured one of the 9/11 planners and put him on trial. If a Looser were on the jury, it would mean automatic acquittal, no matter what evidence the government presented. (Ideally it would never come to that, because the Looser's prejudice would be revealed in the voir dire process.)

And yet, if a a defense lawyer brings in, oh, say "PROFESSOR" Jones as an "EXPERT" witness, just that amount of doubt. . .

(In the background I hear Bob Dylan, [almost just put down Dylan - that would be misinterpreted] singing "You know something is happening here, but you don't know what it is- do you? Mr. Jones.")

The loosers wouldn't care - the dead are just pawns - after all, in their own words: "the people are really secondary."

 

[Gravy]

And yet, if a a defense lawyer brings in, oh, say "PROFESSOR" Jones as an "EXPERT" witness, just that amount of doubt. . .

(In the background I hear Bob Dylan, [almost just put down Dylan - that would be misinterpreted] singing "You know something is happening here, but you don't know what it is- do you? Mr. Jones.")

The loosers wouldn't care - the dead are just pawns - after all, in their own words: "the people don't really matter."

Blech! I've just been listening to Steven Jones being interviewed by Alex Jones. I don't enjoy trying to keep up with the Joneses.

 

[Brainster]

I wonder if that example has ever been proposed to the Loosers. Suppose the US captured one of the 9/11 planners and put him on trial. If a Looser were on the jury, it would mean automatic acquittal, no matter what evidence the government presented. (Ideally it would never come to that, because the Looser's prejudice would be revealed in the voir dire process.)

During a panel presentation in LA, Uncle Fetzer groused about the prosecution of Moussaoui, claiming that the government shouldn't be able to prosecute him for not revealing 9-11 because after all, he has the right not to incriminate himself. It strikes me as an odd argument for a Truther; shouldn't the claim be that Zacharias couldn't have known anything, because there were no Arab hijackers on the plane (which is Fetzer's main contention on that panel)?

 

[brodski]

99 conspiracy theorists on a wall
with 99 theories how.
If one of those theorists should happen to fall
98 conspiracy theorists on a wall!

WHY did the conspiracy theorist fall? Was he PUSHED by a nano-thermite controlled demolition? Where was Bush?
WHY where there 99 conspiracy theorists in one place?!? Was it a FEMA concentration camp, and who paid for the Chinese guillotines?
Who built the wall?!? It was HAlliburton on a no bids contract!

 

[DavidJames]

I was one of the first people back in the air when we re-opened the skies... \

When i got home from my trip i called every military branch to offer my services. They told me to stay flying civilian because im more needed to get America back in the air and that is how i am serving. I felt relieved. Although flying an airplane is like getting paid for a hobby, not only was i happy to go to work as i always was to fly an airplane and get paid..but i was proud to go to work!

I have a lot of respect for people who volunteer to defend the U.S. I may not agree with some of the missions on which they're sent, but that doesn't diminish my respect.

I hope this is the one of few truthful thing johndoeX has ever said because if he's BSing like 99.9% of the drivel and bile he spouts, he deserves a special place in hell (assuming such a place exists of course.)


in this thread:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7668&st=30

 

[delphi_ote]

And yet, if a a defense lawyer brings in, oh, say "PROFESSOR" Jones as an "EXPERT" witness, just that amount of doubt. . .

As long as we keep organized and keep the evidence out there, any such experts will be laughed out of court or be exposed for the fools they are on the witness stand by good lawyers and judges.

Look at Behe in the Dover trial and have hope.

 

[dubfan]

I will continue to be a thorn in the side of every CT'er, because the last thing I ever want to live to see, is the capture of a genuine WTC conspirator, followed by a trial where his defense introduce CT tripe in an attempt to get him off.

One ct'er (or a weak minded individual who has heard this stuff) on the jury, and he gets away.

That day is coming.

 

[apathoid]

I'm done over at the Loose Change Message Board.

It's full of mentally ill people who I want to punch in the face repeatedly.

I go there strictly for comic relief, particularly the alternate theories section. But sometimes, I come away from there feeling a little angry or sad. I often wonder what some of these peoples IQs are. I'd say 80% of them dont crack a 100, so they really cant help it. Others are just utterly delusional and probably should be on meds..

 

[dubfan]

I'm done over at the Loose Change Message Board.

It's full of mentally ill people who I want to punch in the face repeatedly.

We've all been there, NDB. Confronting mass stupidity takes its toll. Time to feed the budgies.

 

[DavidJames]

I'm done over at the Loose Change Message Board.

It's full of mentally ill people who I want to punch in the face repeatedly.

I'm glad you decided against dropping. That was great new thread. Notice like roaches from light, they scurry away from taking a stand.

 

[60hzxtl]

This is something I could watch over and over:

(LC-2 per screwloosechange link)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

 

[SBrown]

As long as we keep organized and keep the evidence out there, any such experts will be laughed out of court or be exposed for the fools they are on the witness stand by good lawyers and judges.

Look at Behe in the Dover trial and have hope.

Why do you feel the need to show the official story as fact? I thought that was done with the money and time spent on the official investigation. If you, as a private citizen, need to defend the government on a constant basis then maybe they are not worth defending.

 

[MarkyX]

Why do you feel the need to show the official story as fact? I thought that was done with the money and time spent on the official investigation. If you, as a private citizen, need to defend the government on a constant basis then maybe they are not worth defending.

It's called public support

 

[twinstead]

Why do you feel the need to show the official story as fact? I thought that was done with the money and time spent on the official investigation. If you, as a private citizen, need to defend the government on a constant basis then maybe they are not worth defending.

People like loose change need to be exposed. Some people (you know, the mature ones) actually care about stuff like that.

It has nothing to do with supporting any theory; it's about keeping liars away from gullible people, and it's the right thing to do.

 

[DavidJames]

It's called public support

I would describe my comments as a combination of attacking ignorance, defending logic and reason, and respecting the integrity of the analysis and testimony of the private companies and public and private citizens who participated in the investigation.

Defending the government does not play in the picture.

SBrown/jenabell: If you think those who contributed to the official reports are lying, I call on you to, using your own name, publicly come out and make your accusations. Call them liars, call them frauds, call them accomplices to murder and treason. Put your reputation on the line. If you really care about this country. Stand up and speak out. Don't hide, don't cower behind a fake identify and computer. There are plenty of lawyers who would, for the publicity and pro-bono, take your case public.

Do you have a strong enough case? Are you man enough?

Finally, what's your real name, my name, as my handle here indicates is David, you can call me Dave.

 

[dubfan]

Why do you feel the need to show the official story as fact? I thought that was done with the money and time spent on the official investigation. If you, as a private citizen, need to defend the government on a constant basis then maybe they are not worth defending.

Defending the government?

Interesting that you characterize our skepticism that way. From what I've seen, people here are very critical of the government. In fact, it might be that the only thing JREFers hate worse than the gubmint is woo.

 

[Pardalis]

And for some of us it's not even our government!