Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
That was because that French idiot wrote that book about how it was a missile. It solds hundreds of thousands of copies. That is where the missile batteries at the Pentagon thing started too.

I wonder who bought them - I've yet to talk to a Frenchman or Frenchwoman who was even aware of it. Hell, I didn't even know about the 9/11 conspiracy garbage until a girl I was dating (who continues to suffer from Bush Defamation Syndrome) posted a link to 9/11 Is A Lie on her Myspace account. The only other time I've come across it until I came here was one rabid (i.e., unthinking) anti-American juvenile gristlehead from Australia. That's twice in nearly 6 months without going out of my way to look for it. Could the numbers quoted as being sold be overinflated?
 
Hello

Here are link to a version of the "Usual Suspects" where the first hijacker part has been shortened. They might still be quite long but I guess it depends on how interested you are in what they have to say.


It can be downloaded in two sizes from:
http://www.archive.org/details/The_Usual_Suspects

Or streamed on Google video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4220657430794722240
If you had the older version linked somewhere please update to this one.

Links are also on my site
www.karim.co.nr


If you see it worth it please link to this video or "push it up the Google charts":)
 
Yeah, a 100 ton aircraft traveling at 500 MPH is going to have its course altered by a 200lb lightpole with a breakaway base.



Funny thing is, they expect an airliner to have its wings torn off by a light pole, but if same airliner flies into a reinforced concrete wall they expect nice chunky, clearly identifiable parts of airplane lying around.

Duh.

-Andrew
 
Argh...

I got 20 minutes into this LC preview thing and had to stop...

I'm literally SEETHING...and I generally don't get angry. These [rule8]'s!

I can't believe they used a live recorded phone call of someone caught in the towers, at the moment of collapse, as part of their twisted little theory. SICK. Utterly incomprehensible.

:mad:

I need to break something...

-Andrew

That part made me cringe as well.

If only I can get the original, we can start a debunking video right away :)
 
Hello
Here are link to a version of the "Usual Suspects" where the first hijacker part has been shortened. They might still be quite long but I guess it depends on how interested you are in what they have to say.
Thanks, Karim. Again, excellent job.
 
Yeah, that's the smorgasbord thing. Love the interview with Sander Hicks; google him some afternoon when you're looking for a laugh. He's not quite as um, unique as Judy Wood (in a coma for six years?), but still at the far right end of the bell curve on nuttiness.

Okay, my mistake for not reading far up enough. Wow, that's a kooky video and the woman going on about the clocks in the Pentagon segment is hilarious. I also love Kevin Ryan telling us that "I'm certainly not the brightest guy"; that's a definite keeper!
 
Wow, that's a kooky video and the woman going on about the clocks in the Pentagon segment is hilarious.


I like how a single officer (who was only in the Pentagon temporarily) claiming that there was only ever bomb-sniffer dogs there on 9/11, combined with a couple of inaccurate clocks is irrefutable 100% absolute evidence that a bomb went off in the Pentagon before the plane hit.:confused:

-Andrew
 
Loose Change Final Cut Trailer Viewer Guide​

Page 1​

'Final Cut' consists mainly of talking heads* regurgitating the same tired, old, thoroughly debunked baloney.

(*Fetzer, Jones (Alex), Jim Marr, Kevin Ryan and some others).

Er.....that's it.
 
I am watching this drivel as I write.
The interviews are tedium incarnate.I hope it at least speeds up a bit with some funky music
Where is Dylans whining voice over?
 
Hello

Here are link to a version of the "Usual Suspects" where the first hijacker part has been shortened. They might still be quite long but I guess it depends on how interested you are in what they have to say.


It can be downloaded in two sizes from:
http://www.archive.org/details/The_Usual_Suspects

Or streamed on Google video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4220657430794722240
If you had the older version linked somewhere please update to this one.

Links are also on my site
www.karim.co.nr


If you see it worth it please link to this video or "push it up the Google charts":)

Already done uploading to my sites and going to spread the world.

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr

I got quite a few emails about it and even someone suggested that I send this film to Canadian and American forces.
 
Loose Change Final Cut Trailer Viewer Guide​

Page 1​

'Final Cut' consists mainly of talking heads* regurgitating the same tired, old, thoroughly debunked baloney.

(*Fetzer, Jones (Alex), Jim Marr, Kevin Ryan and some others).

Er.....that's it.

And I'll repeat from my cult article..

Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.
 
As a species, we seem to have quite a knack for getting our beliefs in package deals or tie-in sales.

Well, if reflexion is like money in the neural world, and considering how intellectually lazy people usually are, it's only natural that they'd go for the 4-for-1 sales on theories or the 40% off ideologies.
 
OK, I've been off for ten days while wandering about Mammoth Cave (boy, does it get dark in there when you get left behind and they shut off the lights) and other sundry places.

Did I miss anything interesting? New Bannings at Loose Change? DJ every stick his head back over hear to debate Gravy? New ninja costumes?

OK, go back to wating another 5 days for my ban a LC to end..
 
I am watching this drivel as I write.
The interviews are tedium incarnate.I hope it at least speeds up a bit with some funky music
Where is Dylans whining voice over?

I don't think there's a chance in the world that this will be the final cut; Dylan just seems to be using that title frame because he's got it handy. He also used it for the smorgasbord video.

I am reasonably confident that most of the film will be similar to LC2 in structure and content. Dylan may add snippets of that interview with the clock lady or the gal who claimed there was radioactivity eight miles from the Pentagon or the cameraman who says the hole in the Pentagon's outer wall was 16 feet wide, but I doubt he will let them ramble on the way he does in the two interviews. (On the other hand, he showed no ability to edit the interview with the guy at the airfield--it's two minutes long and the only payoff is that Hani Hanjour had average to below average piloting skills).

And don't anybody kid themselves; this is going to be a slick production aimed squarely at the young adult market. Dylan's good at this stuff, and he's getting better. Yeah, LC2 is flawed factually, but stylistically it has been an enormous success. I expect the Final Cut to be better than LC2 in that regard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom