Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's a great show on the History Channel right now called "The 9-11 Hijackers: Inside the Hamburg Cell."
Anyone else watching?

From the History Channel Site:


What History Channel are you watching? I'm seeing "Snackfood Tech" on Modern Marvels!


(Or would be if I hadn't had Comcast Cable take away my History Channel service after "Psychic History.")
 
I knew it, it was the Keebler elves who were behind it! Damn little rodents... (muttering to self)

Of course!

Here's the elf that fired the missle into the Pentagon...

keebler_02.jpg


Here they are faking the plane passengers...

keebler_03.jpg


And here they are measuring just how many people bought into their fake 9/11 hijackers story...

keebler_05.jpg


It makes sense now! Elvin magic my ass!
 
The ship is then only required to load, store and carry one kind of fuel.

Well, two, because there's the Av-gas as well for the Hawkeye's, Greyhounds, and choppers... :P

But it's probably easier to make an engine that can run on kerosene than one that runs on av-gas. The Humvee - for example - can run on petrol, kerosene, or diesel.

Still... if he's talking about the actual tankers, not the tugs, they're just standard trucks. It's not logical to run them on jet fuel, it would cost a fortune. (It would make them a hellava more powerful though...)

-Andrew
 
I'm about to get the ban hammer from the loosers again.

Any suggestions for a good "going out with a bang" post before the mods wake up?
 
I'm about to get the ban hammer from the loosers again.

Any suggestions for a good "going out with a bang" post before the mods wake up?



I dunno about a last post, but I suggest you google the word "Tor" and read up on a way to get around their ip bans.

That way you can just start up a sock when you get banned.

That's what the rest of us do.
 
I'm about to get the ban hammer from the loosers again.

Any suggestions for a good "going out with a bang" post before the mods wake up?
You could ask them why they still support "Loose Change," which gets every claim wrong, and which was created by people with no respect for the truth or for the victims of 9/11.
 
Apparently the 767s used were refitted military tankers to carry passengers, or something like that anyway. I asked, why would they refit tankers when they could just get a passenger version and save themselves the hassle.


Aside from a minor problem here...

The first orders for the KC-767 military tanker were placed in July 2001 for Italy (for delivery between April 2006 and July 2008). The United States Air Force has considered replacing its KC-135 tankers with KC-767s, and as of 2006 it will be leasing 100 of them for trials.

In May 2003, the US Air Force announced that it would lease 100 tankers to replace the oldest of its KC-135 tankers, subject to congressional approval. The lease would be for six years, starting in 2006. An option to buy at the end of the lease was included in the deal.

In other words... in September 2001 no airforce in the world operated a tanker variant of the Boeing 767. The USAF operated (and currently still does) only KC-135 Stratotankers (modified version of the Boeing Dash-80) and KC-10 Extenders (modified version of the DC-10).

All the above took about 2 minutes to discover with Google. In fact typing up this post, and pasting in all the relevent URLs took much longer than finding it all. These CTers must really want the truth!

-Andrew

EDT. Just read JamesB's post... he beat me too it. :)
 
Last edited:
I got a PM about this online chat that's going to happen with Jim Fetzer. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread214411/pg1

I requested to be included in the discussion group. Sign up and do the same! (It only takes a minute to register at ATS.)

According to their selection criteria, I doubt I'd be accepted as one of the 20 who get to question him. I'm just too honest.

"Hello, I just signed up for your forum, and the reason I want to talk to Jim Fetzer is because I want to blast him for being such a moron. Thank you."

(stamp) REJECTED
 
I got a PM about this online chat that's going to happen with Jim Fetzer. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread214411/pg1

I requested to be included in the discussion group. Sign up and do the same! (It only takes a minute to register at ATS.)

I get the sense they are not looking for skeptics:

We will be striving to select an equal balance of members who represent the varying opinions of 9/11 conspiracies.

And later, in the comments:

People, we will insist on a degree of respect for special guests.

In addition, AboveTopSecret.com is a conspiracy theory website.

Of course, maybe we could get in as believing in a conspiracy theory involving 19 Arabs with box cutters?
 
I'm about to get the ban hammer from the loosers again.

Any suggestions for a good "going out with a bang" post before the mods wake up?

Maybe a post on this thread telling them to repent, it's not too late to save their relationships with their families and friends, to drop the conspiracy theories before they end up like Charlie Sheen, whose wife is divorcing him partially over his 9-11 nuttiness?
 
Oh yeah... and this site addresses the question "Can Jet-A fuels substitude for 1-D or 2-D Diesel?

Remember, while there is only one basic Jet A species, there are several
kinds of diesel - diesel No. 1 and diesel No. 2 (amongst others). Jet A is
more like Diesel No. 1. Diesel No. 2 is the more common "diesel" fuel,
since it is the fuel used by vehicles "on-road". One of the main
differences between them is their distillation boiling ranges. Diesel No. 2
has a higher (in temperature) boiling range and is more dense than Jet A
and/or diesel No. 1 (both of which have lower densities and lower
boiling range temperatures). A fuel which is less dense will have lower
fuel economy (less BTU's per gallon).

May explain differences in Diesel ignition temperature on different websites.

In addition:

So the bottom line is that although Jet-A may not cause immediate damage to
a diesel engine and may allow the engine to run OK, its use may cause
premature wear or fouling of the fuel system, and you may be breaking EPA
regulations as well as not paying appropriate taxes. Outside the US,
differences in viscosity still mean that the use of Jet-A for Diesel No. 1
may cause early wear of the fuel system. Kind of like running 10 weight
oil in a car designed for 30 weight. So how much risk are you willing to
take, because no engine manufacturer or fuel supplier will take part of the
risk?

-Andrew
 
I get the sense they are not looking for skeptics:



And later, in the comments:



Of course, maybe we could get in as believing in a conspiracy theory involving 19 Arabs with box cutters?

People, we will insist on a degree of respect for special guests.

In addition, AboveTopSecret.com is a conspiracy theory website.

As much respect as Fetzer shows the families of 9/11 victims? Or the rules of logic for that matter.

I couldn't do this. I don't think I could hold my temper trying to talk with that idiot. I would start slamming my head against the keyboard or something.
 
Maybe a post on this thread telling them to repent, it's not too late to save their relationships with their families and friends, to drop the conspiracy theories before they end up like Charlie Sheen, whose wife is divorcing him partially over his 9-11 nuttiness?


Given his repeated drug abuse, his paranoia over 9/11 and people breaking into his house certainly make it easy to explain why he would mistake a movie for an actual snuff film and call the FBI.

People that whacked out on drugs aren't very good critical thinkers.
 
Given his repeated drug abuse, his paranoia over 9/11 and people breaking into his house certainly make it easy to explain why he would mistake a movie for an actual snuff film and call the FBI.

People that whacked out on drugs aren't very good critical thinkers.
Denise Richards got a restraining order against him, last I heard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom