Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
NobbyNobbs said:
I've discovered something interesting. Sometimes, when you bring up a valid point to the CTers, they resort to insults. Sometimes they change the subject. Sometimes they deny your evidence.


And sometimes, the thread just....dies.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5207&st=0&#entry5015235
Click to expand...

from "constitution" in the thread you posted:

common sense says to me that if faced with a million protestors in washington the army wouldnt fire.

Knowing the army tho they would just use it to perform a coup de tat
Click to expand...

Coup de tat??? What is a "tat"?
 
I keep rereading that last post by "constitution" and I really can't make heads or tails with it!
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Why is it that the CTers default rebuttel is, "Nuh uh!"? I swear, their simple existence is the most damning evidence of the failure of the public education system in the US.
Click to expand...

Indeed. I got only so far before my eyes rolled completely back into their sockets. First they post shots of a fire at night. then compare it to a photos and films of fires shot during the day. Can you say 'invalid comparison'?

Then after Gravy's comment about 90%+ of the plane being recovered they reply with 'Is that of the quality of recovered plane at the Pentagon'. Classic begging the question. Let's attack a valid premise using an unsupported assumption.

I gave up looking after that. But they really are not very good at this.
 
CptColumbo said:
http://messageboards.aol.com/aol/en_us/articles.php?boardId=563016&func=3&channel=News

The message board for the article is very telling of how sick people are of hearing from the CT crowd.
Click to expand...

Not surprising. We're coming up on the 5th anniversery of the event and people are starting to reminice about their experiences that day. Like knowing exactly where you were when you heard JFK was shot (In my case, not born yet). People tell the tales, and its not hard to find folks who were near or at the various ground zeros.

WHat is happening now is that when a thread or two of these things starts up its only a matter of a 1/2 dozen posts talking about before some 911 CT'er comes screaming in with a pile of stock links and cut n' paste screed saying how it was an inside job, yadda yadda. Rude in the extreme, and very disrespectful. Yet its happening more and more. The Flight93 movie board was shut down with screed and the CT'ers declared it a 'victory'. This is the shining example of all that the childish, tantrum-prone, selfish, paranoid, self-centered, egotistical, monomanical 911 CT'ers are.

Conspiracy theories are the opiates of the self-impressed.
 
That argument always cracks me up. They are always quibbling over what percentage of wreckage and bodies were recovered from the crash site. Uhh... short of some other explanation of how it got there, wouldn't "any" percentage of wreckage and bodies prove the plane crashed there? You can't have it both ways, either the wreckage is there, or it isn't. Everything else is just details.
 
JamesB said:
That argument always cracks me up. They are always quibbling over what percentage of wreckage and bodies were recovered from the crash site. Uhh... short of some other explanation of how it got there, wouldn't "any" percentage of wreckage and bodies prove the plane crashed there? You can't have it both ways, either the wreckage is there, or it isn't. Everything else is just details.
Click to expand...
Ah, but you're missing the "middle ground." Specifically, not only did the US Government, in a conspiracy which would only take a few to carry out, launch a missile at the Pentagon and fly an unknown something into Shanksville, PA, it sent in operatives to -- get this -- sprinkle evidence around. But you're right that it's impractical to plant a whole plane as evidence (as opposed to the eminently practical other parts of the plot) so the government only planted some of a plane at each crash site.

Seriously. You'll often find these guys referring to remains of the aircraft as being sufficiently small to be carried by hand, as if that's what happened.
 
I wonder. Does anyone know:

Is the letsroll911.org forum just as intolerant of dissent as the LC forum?

Team JREF Ninja Wave! Go!
 
azazal said:
Well you've heard of "tit for tat", well where can I get some tat and trade it in?

(thank you Dennis Miller)
Click to expand...

Ah... If I get this straight, what "constitution" meant was that because the Army would be cooporative (tit), therefore the protesters would use that to react the same way in payment (tat) for future cooperation from the Army. Hence, the "coup de tat" by the protesters, assuming they are the "they" in:

Knowing the army tho they would just use it to perform a coup de tat
Click to expand...

I still don't get what this has to do with anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom