Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK, Thanks. I don't see why people wish to substitue evil for stupid (both are bad) but still makes slightly more sense than CD or holograms (people have no idea what those are).

New conspiracy theory: NDIFGJ (Ninjas Did It For Great Justice). It would explain why the conspiracy busters are all suspiciously ninjas...quickly checking behind me---few.
 
Added another link to my page.

This time, showing that the A-3 Skywarrior uses a Two Pratt & Whitney J57-P-10 turbojet engines (not the JT8D)

So much fun debunking Loose Change :p
 
remember to save that footage of the sander hicks interview on the lc3 preview, he's running for senate and im sure his opponent would love it.
 
Ramooone said:
remember to save that footage of the sander hicks interview on the lc3 preview, he's running for senate and im sure his opponent would love it.
Click to expand...
He's not running for senate. He only claimed to be a Green Party candidate for Senate. In fact, he lost the primary (which might have had something to do with the fact that he's totally bat **** insane.)
 
Another telling quote from the Ramtha interview

I know there’s high school classes that are refusing to watch 9/11 videos, like 9/11, you know, supposed official documentaries, because their teachers try to play them and they’re like, “No, we’ve already seen Loose Change and we don’twant to watch this” I mean, someone told me that the other day, they heard that from a friend who was still in high school. I mean that’s unreal, I mean, groups of high school students, are like banding around my movie. It’s kinda cool.
Click to expand...

OK, so how are you doing outside of the Hillary Duff set?
 
delphi_ote said:
He's not running for senate. He only claimed to be a Green Party candidate for Senate. In fact, he lost the primary (which might have had something to do with the fact that he's totally bat **** insane.)
Click to expand...

It's bad when you're too wacko to win the primary!
 
Let me take this opportunity to thank all those who have posted on this and the previous thread. You have forced me to look more deeply into the events of 9/11, and have armed me with information I need if I ever encounter a CTist (although I have only encountered them on the internet, which may explain a lot). I have been flexing my investigative journalism muscles again, and started to visit the public library after a long absense. It's inspired me to work on other writing projects that I abandoned long ago (i.e. a screenplay about the presidency of John Tyler). I had lost some of my passion for history over the last few years, but now I feel that old spark again.
 
John Tyler is behind 9/11? Just wait until Dylan Avery gets a hold of this!
 
What is the CT explanation for the fact that the Pentagon didn't fall? It seems to me that since 'they' rigged the towers, why not that too? I'd have thought that one would have been a smaller demo job that just one of the towers. Maybe I can't get a sense of scale from the photos though.
Wouldn't that have been easier to rig too? Being full of 'shills' and all?

I remember watching it that day and it wasn't the towers falling that had greatest impact on me, it was the sight of planes hitting them, especially the second one, when it became so apparent that this wasn't some horrific accident. This CT just makes so little sense it makes me wonder how stupid people really are.
 
The real source!

JamesB said:
John Tyler is behind 9/11? Just wait until Dylan Avery gets a hold of this!
Click to expand...

Absolutely. He had William Henry Harrison whacked so he could take over the presidency at the behest of the Illuminati. :D
 
Gravy said:
If anyone is bored here, there's some fresh meat at AlterNet, due to an article that came out today: http://www.alternet.org/story/37046/?cID=131202#c131202
Click to expand...
What kind of sloppy reporting is this?

"In my research for this article, I went through several websites dedicated to debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories, but was unable to find anything disputing the BBC story (and anyone who has contrary evidence is invited to send it to me or post a refutation in the comments section of this article)."


http://www.911myths.com/html/still_alive.html
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,265160-2,00.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/02/attack/main316806.shtml
 
Last edited:
It's really hard to follow the "logic".
They posit a conspiracy which is:
Willing to kill thousands of its own citizens indirectly through the destruction of the WTC.
Willing to kill hundreds of its own citizens directly (Flight 93 at least, all of the flights by some accounts) to keep the conspiracy secret.
Balks at killing 19 foreigners.
Is it just me, or does this seem a trifle inconsistent?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom