No, it isn't crap. It contains a lot of errors and hearsay and is by far not good enough to convince people like you that the official CT is crap.
The key issues? The cover-up is the key issue.
You begin immediately with an assumption couched as a fact. It doesn't do much for your credibility nor does it present an example of open-mindedness on the issue.
1. The USA is a constitutional republic. Mass murder is the most serious crime one can commit. Shouldn't there be a criminal investigation "USA vs. Unknown, case: the massmurder of September 11th 2001"? Instead of this the FBI came up on the first day with this list of 19 Highjackers which wasn't changed till then, they showed us a crappy videostill of Atta entering an Airport, his passport and a Koran and a Testament in his alleged car. Where is the chain of evidence for the official CT?
There was an investigation by the FBI. But what are they going to do when the murderers killed themselves while committing the crime?
2. The FBI investigated in Florida for a few weeks, then they were ordered back to investigate the "Anthrax letters". They never returned and a lot of people say, the FBI told them not to talk about their experiences. Who was behind the anthrax letters the FBI so diligently investigated?
A lot of people say this, or is it Hopsicker that claims this? It seems that you are basing just about all of your claims on Hopsicker. It's always wise, when formulating ideas or opinions, to get your information from a wide variety of sources.
3. The people I mentioned in 2. were interviewed by Daniel Hopsicker - he has to do the work of the whole investigative apparatus of the US. He found out that Mohammed Attas trail leads directly into the international organized crime scene and that the "Commision Report" can indeed be called an "Omission Report".
Care to outline where the 9/11 Report contained ommissions? I always hear this claim made by the CTs but it's always a general accusation with zero specifics.
4. Evidence was destroyed or is under closure.
Such as? Again, your being accusatory by making a general statement.
5. The Legend was tweaked several times and people like the alleged masterminds Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh are not on trial or were even allowed to witness in the Moussaoui-trial.
How was the legend tweaked? Are you basing that on what the media reported.
I've got news for you...the media frequently reports incorrectly, particularly when it comes to big news stories. In their rush to present a scoop they often don't verify their stories or sources. As evidence, see Katrina and even the killing of Zarqawi yesterday.
6. "Coincidently", parts of the "Truth movement" have connections to the very same people that should be under investigation and their net of "woo"-spreading clowns.
Ever heard of six degrees of seperation? If I looked hard enough I could probably connect you to the Mafia, Michael Moore, and Josef Stalin. So what?
YOU are the people who don't get the bigger picture - not the folks over at the LC Forum.
The only picture I get is that you haven't proven a single thing and most of your statements are either straw men or red herrings.
