Thank you. (documented, Bishop, Priest, GP, Police, Hospital.)
sigh 
This is not informative. From this cryptic note I have to conclude that all you mean when you say you have "documented" your earlier experiences (the ones you are so absolutely certain really occurred) is that you have told these different authority figures your story.
If that's what you do mean, then you have nothing. As I've tried to explain, perceptions and memories are extremely malleable, suggestible things, and simply recounting what you interpreted as events does not make reliable documentation.
So we are back to your prior beliefs being manifested in your unreliable interpretations of suggestive situations or "events" (such as noises etc.) Please know that
all of us are unreliable witnesses, as I've tried to explain. None of us can rely on our sensory perceptions and interpretations alone. Even groups of people can and do experience shared delusions/misinterpretations of events.
The story you recount above on this page of the thread about how it all began, with your belief that someone entered the house and went upstairs, while it seems so sound to you, could easily be a series of misinterpretations of what occurred, coloured and "explained" by your assumptions and easy acceptance that supernatural events are possible.
At so far a remove it's now impossible to investigate, but if you will allow me a thought experiment:
You were expecting your husband soon, so a sound in your hall or even outside your front door would unconsciously immediately associate with that expectation of an arrival in the house. You don't mention whether you had a family pet at the time, but a dog in the house could easily account for all the things you describe. It's easy to forget to turn a light off upstairs and later discover it is on and wonder who turned it on. Things like that happen all the time. Having started to believe uncanny things had happened, your heightened alertness would do the equivalent of pareidolia and feed in confirmations to your developing narrative from any number of subliminal perceptions of indistinct sensory glimpses. The final departure event you used as a way to clear your fear. Again, a dog running down your stairs would be a trigger for you to add the wished for event of the departure.
You may say you had no dog (we don't have enough information to really deal with this, so this is all by way of an example to help you understand that your interpretations might have been too neat, too swift, not necessarily correct). Did you have a cat flap? Cats are always prowling into other people's houses, looking for food and adventure. Was it windy on both the nights (the arrival and the departure)? Old houses creak and shift... wood expands and contracts as humidity and temperatures change.
Etc. Jumping to the thrill of a supernatural event (and fear is a kind of thrill) is too easy to do, especially if you are predisposed to believe it possible, as you really seem to be (and seem to want it to be, which is even more telling).
So again: you have no actual valid documentation of events you are convinced were real.
You may feel a bit confused by the number of people throwing questions and suggestions at you in this thread, especially as you don't really seem to want to seriously establish whether these spirits actually exist, through the protocols that were being worked on early in this thread. You just keep floundering with "tests" that are not really tests at all, but just more playing around with pareidolia.
It's getting boring.
I would suggest that you really knuckle down and work with one or two people from this forum to seriously address the first issue: do they exist at all? Alderbank and one or two others who were drawing up good protocols early on ought to be the contact points. You guys work it out, and report back to the rest of us.
The information and communication from you has been so incomplete, so randomly focussed (for instance your sudden unexplained reference to special fingers dropped in after so many pages, or your uninformative response [quoted above at the start of this post] to my earlier discussion about documentation), that this thread is becoming an unwieldy clamour of confusion and backtracking.
I have no more to offer, so I'm going to let others more experienced and competent than I do the work with you to test the reality of the spirits' existence (note the correct use of apostrophe just there, by the way... to tap into a vein of humour that was gently humanising this thread earlier on
). Perhaps we can organise a small committee of representatives of the skeptic position to interact with you, so they can coordinate questions and answers with you. The rest of us could communicate thoughts, ideas etc to them via private messages, and they could be the sole point of interaction you would need to deal with.
I think it would help to settle flaccon to a more productive focus of attention.
What do people think?
