Let's ask again: What was the MOTIVE for WTC7?

JHarrow said:
Ah right, so when the lawyers etc went looking for their 3000 files after 9/11 what would they say? Oops we accidentally shredded them?
Click to expand...

:rule10 happens...

The New York Times said:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has had its share of lapses and scandals over the years, but its mishandling of 3,000 pages of investigative documents in the biggest domestic terrorism case ever tried in this country is a particularly shocking failure.
Click to expand...

In other news...

"Computer Tech Accidentally Erases Info on Alaska's $38 Billion Oil Fund"
"Erase Disgrace – D.A. Office Tapes over Cop-Slay Statement"
"Watchdog says IRS unable to readily locate key files"

The list goes on and on. Have you ever worked for the government JHarrow?

Linkys:
http://www.crownheights.info/index.php?itemid=10782
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,259842,00.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DEEDB1E3BF931A25756C0A9679C8B63
 
Last edited:
If building 7 had survived but 3000 files had disappeared from SEC offices there would be a major scandal.
 
JHarrow - since you ignored my last post as I figured you would, I've got another question for you:

How did the perps ensure a HUGE FLAMING CHUNK of tower 1 would hit WTC7? Because, you know, if it hadn't have done so, it would indeed look pretty suspicious for the thing to fall down.

2 things to remember before answering:

1. "Thermite cutter charges" wouldn't have been able to ensure this.
2. A bomb would've been heard and seen.
 
JHarrow said:
Not if you claim it collapse due to the towers collapsing.

Please explain how they could have gotten rid of those documents without getting rid of the building? You can't misplace 3000 files. People would have asked serious questions if the documents had just disappeared.
Click to expand...

So flying planes into the twin towers, the pentagon and into the ground in PA was all about the destruction of 3000 files in WTC 7?
 
lapman said:
You mean that the FDNY evacuated WTC 7 and was clearing the area shortly before that broadcast for no reason?
Click to expand...

Collapse zones around high rise fires are standard. They are not put in place in case the building implodes, they are created in case of partial collapses or things falling off the building.

These zones happen in all high rise fires.
 
How could someone know those files even existed without knowing the contents of those files?
 
JHarrow said:
Not if you claim it collapse due to the towers collapsing.
Click to expand...

Didn't you say that you "knew" WTC7 was a CD just by looking at it?

You said it yourself; the collapse of 7 was very "suspicious". If the perps were going for stealth they failed miserably.

And remember, Building 7 was crippled by falling debris, by pretty much sheer dumb luck. What would've happened if their luck had gone bad and it HADN'T been hit by any falling debris? That would've been pretty embarrassing for the perps, wouldn't it?

Please explain how they could have gotten rid of those documents without getting rid of the building? You can't misplace 3000 files.
Click to expand...

Oh, I beg to differ.

People would have asked serious questions if the documents had just disappeared.
Click to expand...

Do you honestly think these "lawyers" are going to ask for ALL 3000 documents at the same time? They would only ask for the ones relevant to their respective case. Given the government's track record at...well, keeping track of things, I doubt anyone would notice.

Certainly, fewer people would notice than if you were to demolish a building in broad daylight.
 
cisco said:
JHarrow - since you ignored my last post as I figured you would, I've got another question for you:

How did the perps ensure a HUGE FLAMING CHUNK of tower 1 would hit WTC7? Because, you know, if it hadn't have done so, it would indeed look pretty suspicious for the thing to fall down.

2 things to remember before answering:

1. "Thermite cutter charges" wouldn't have been able to ensure this.
2. A bomb would've been heard and seen.
Click to expand...


Good question. However, Barry Jennings claims explosions occured in 7 before the North tower fell. Some claim 7 was on fire at this time too.
 
JHarrow said:
Please explain how they could have gotten rid of those documents without getting rid of the building?
Click to expand...
Shredded them? Burned them? Flushed them? Ate them?

Please explain what documents they needed to destroy, and why, and how the loss of these documents hurt any investigations, and explain to me if the contents of these documents has been recovered.
 
JHarrow said:
Good question. However, Barry Jennings claims explosions occured in 7 before the North tower fell. Some claim 7 was on fire at this time too.
Click to expand...

What extraordinary evidence does he provide for these extraordinary claims? Surely he must have something big for you to believe this one person over every other witness and every other piece of evidence.

EDIT: I just realized that this was a COMPLETE DODGE NON-ANSWER. Your troother-troll evasion methods of arguing are well-honed, Jedi Master.

The huge flaming chunk is still required for a plausible collapse alibi in your fantasy. How did they make it happen?
 
Last edited:
JHarrow said:
Collapse zones around high rise fires are standard.
Click to expand...
Why would that be....if fire can not cause buildings to collapse?

Garb said:
How could someone know those files even existed without knowing the contents of those files?
Click to expand...

JHarrow. I'd like to see you answer this question, along with what were those documents, and why did they need to be destroyed?
 
Speculation is where you are working from, JHarrow. All you have provided for evidence is conjecture from those who have speculated. You ought to look up the definition of speculation. Oh wait! I'll do it...

Speculation:
Conjectural consideration of a matter; conjecture or surmise: a report based on speculation rather than facts.

Is it conjecture that causes you to believe there was reason to shed documents?
 
gc051360 said:
Why would that be....if fire can not cause buildings to collapse?



JHarrow. I'd like to see you answer this question, along with what were those documents, and why did they need to be destroyed?
Click to expand...

I explained in the quote you mined why they make collapse zones.
 
cisco said:
What extraordinary evidence does he provide for these extraordinary claims? Surely he must have something big for you to believe this one person over every other witness and every other piece of evidence.

EDIT: I just realized that this was a COMPLETE DODGE NON-ANSWER. Your troother-troll evasion methods of arguing are well-honed, Jedi Master.

The huge flaming chunk is still required for a plausible collapse alibi in your fantasy. How did they make it happen?
Click to expand...

Jennings worked in the OEM. He has no reason to lie and he experienced the explosions personally
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom