Let's ask again: What was the MOTIVE for WTC7?

JHarrow said:
I explained in the quote you mined why they make collapse zones.
Click to expand...

Can fire cause a building to collapse?

You acknowledge it can cause "partial collapse", why not full collapse?

Ok. You accuse me of quote mining, but...what about answering the question I asked you to answer, which was asked by Garb.

Garb said:
How could someone know those files even existed without knowing the contents of those files?
Click to expand...

Answer this question. If people knew about the files, wouldn't they know the basics of what is on them? And, if they were super secret, why would anyone go looking for them?

1- What was destroyed?
2- Why did it need to be destroyed?
3- How did the destruction hurt any investigations?
4- How much of the information was recovered?
 
Last edited:
JHarrow said:
Irrelevant??? You asked why I beleive him and I answered!!!
Click to expand...

Read the edit from after I realized the whole response was a dodge:
cisco said:
EDIT: I just realized that this was a COMPLETE DODGE NON-ANSWER.

The huge flaming chunk is still required for a plausible collapse alibi in your fantasy. How did they make it happen?
Click to expand...
The huge flaming chunk is still necessary no matter what your nutcase claims. How did they make it happen?
 
cisco said:
Read the edit from after I realized the whole response was a dodge:

The huge flaming chunk is still necessary no matter what your nutcase claims. How did they make it happen?
Click to expand...

I don't think i'll bother now after you called me a nutcase.
 
HyJinX said:
So flying planes into the twin towers, the pentagon and into the ground in PA was all about the destruction of 3000 files in WTC 7?
Click to expand...

No it was about the destruction of files that could for the most part be reconstructed. It was all about causing delays in some cases.

And this report was written very soon after 9/11 when the effects were not fully known. Can anyone point to cases that were in fact significantly hampered or delayed.

So does anyone actually believe it was a motive to destroy an entire building "and risk discovery" to potentially hamper the investigation into some cases.

"Court papers can largely be reconstituted, but work product has to be reconstructed," he said. "This will cause delays in court and will require significant reduplication of effort." Some data, he added, "won't be recreatable."

"Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive," said Max Berger of New York's Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. "This is a disaster for these cases."

"The SEC will have some difficulty, but the bounce-back will come relatively easily," predicts Harvey Goldschmid, Dwight professor of law at Columbia University and former general counsel of the SEC. "It will throw things off for a period of time, but most of what's important can be regained. They will have to reconstruct these documents. But most of this was backed up or in Washington. They've lost some transcripts but even they're available."

EEOC Records Destroyed

The EEOC's New York office, which was housed in 7 World Trade Center, sustained no loss of life. But all the agency's records were destroyed.

Many of the files are backed up in the computer system, but a substantial number of documents are simply gone, said Spencer Lewis, the EEOC district director. Depositions and notes were not scanned into computers and are lost. With depositions and interviews, the agency will be contacting court reporters "and hoping that they've got them so we can reconstruct files," Lewis said. This covers about 45 active cases, including a recent action against Morgan Stanley
Click to expand...
 
I have to go somewhere for a few hours. I would like to continue this later because you haven't provided anything resembling a sufficient answer.
 
JHG. What documents were destroyed? Why were they destroyed? What did the destruction of these papers cause? Was the information recovered from other places?

And again. If they are secret documents, how would anyone know about them to even ask? If people know of their existence, wouldn't it mean they'd have a good idea of what information they contained?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom