• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

so, send them a link

well you have a point there. I mean what public defender would want to provide evidence that his/her client, who is accused of the biggest crime in america's history btw, is innocent? After all how would they turn getting ksm found innocent into anything useful as far as a legal career goes.

Not to mention the absolute pointlessness of such a high profile event causing mainstream america to start questioning 9/11 (if he didn't do it who did!?!?!?) thus validating the truth movement and likely getting that new investigation. Nah... That would mean you would have to do something as arduous as send an email and you'd have to care about the 3,000+ who died on 9/11, the thousands who have died in the events since then, the constitution, hell justice in general...

b i n g o
 
Yes. When do you plan on turning over your "analysis" to KSM's defense team?

It's online.
, and we know how well that has worked for PfT in the past, or for that matter, how well that has worked for the TM in general.

I doubt they will pay attention to it anyway, they are public pretenders. Government run healthcare, government run legal services, it's all the same.

Is that the overarching reason why the TM is doing absolutly nothing in defense of a man they claim is innocent? "Why bother even trying?" is the rationale for inaction? How then did the TM get started in the first place? Why bother calling for a new, independant investigation since you already could conclude that it will never happen?
 
Last edited:
How much time did you spend on that? What a horrible waste. As far as legal analyses go, this is absolutely useless. I suggest a new hobby.
 
I would not believe what a terrorist says anyway.

What a wonderful tautology!

If KSM denies being a terrorist, we must believe he is not because only terrorists lie.

If KSM admits he is a terrorist, we must believe he is not because all terrorists lie.

:rolleyes:
 
you have been stricken from the jury pool.

Why have you lied about the charges pending against KSM? Why do you feel the need to lie?

Your article cites the charges pending before the military tribunal. KSM is now being charged in federal court, why have you not posted and quoted those charges?
 
Why have you lied about the charges pending against KSM? Why do you feel the need to lie?

Your article cites the charges pending before the military tribunal. KSM is now being charged in federal court, why have you not posted and quoted those charges?

The feds have to go through the formality of getting a new indictment.

They are just resubmitting the same case according to my sources.
 
On the contrary, Rolf assumed that he was telling the truth. I am asking why a guilty person would tell the truth in this case.
Is this the sole reason for Rolf to assert that they were actually wanting only to become airline pilots?

The email is evidence that Atta wanted to be a career airline pilot. If you presume Atta is innocent, just take what he says at face value.
 
The email is evidence that Atta wanted to be a career airline pilot. If you presume Atta is innocent, just take what he says at face value.

Oh dur, you think they would train him if he said: "i want to kill many,many americans by flying planes into buildings"?
 
The email is evidence that Atta wanted to be a career airline pilot. If you presume Atta is innocent, just take what he says at face value.

Take what he says? You do realize that he is dead, right?

Does it make sense you to that someone would just drop out of a PhD program in architecture in Germany to become an airline pilot in Florida?
 
The feds have to go through the formality of getting a new indictment.

They are just resubmitting the same case according to my sources.

What source? Since every conceivable variable from the trier of fact (Commission vs Jury) to the rules of evidence have changed, why do you think everything will remain the same?
 
What source? Since every conceivable variable from the trier of fact (Commission vs Jury) to the rules of evidence have changed, why do you think everything will remain the same?

They might drop a few alleged overt acts because the rules of evidence are pretty lax in military court.

Otherwise it will be the same, they will list pretty much the same overt acts as in the military charge sheet.

When the new indictment comes out, we will put out a statement if anything changes.

As it stands now, the defendants can still all be tried in military court, Obama has the right to change his mind.
 
Take what he says? You do realize that he is dead, right?

Does it make sense you to that someone would just drop out of a PhD program in architecture in Germany to become an airline pilot in Florida?

The feds wouldn't want the jury to know Atta was in a PhD program) if such a claim is true).

The feds will do anything possible to keep this out of admitted evidence.

The more the jury knows about the identities of the 19 alleged hijackers (besides the stuff the feds say in press releases), the more difficult to picture them committing a heinous crime.

If it does make its way into evidence, I am certain the the feds will use your spin. You are very good at spin.

It is too bad that you don't use your excellent communication skills for good, rather than for evil.
 
"Originally Posted by Galileo
The email is evidence that Atta wanted to be a career airline pilot. If you presume Atta is innocent, just take what he says at face value."

classic truther denial.
 
Oh dur, you think they would train him if he said: "i want to kill many,many americans by flying planes into buildings"?

I might expect that if I presumed Atta guilty. But in other places, the government claims Atta made a "martyr will". So if Atta is not afraid to make a "martyr will", then why not just email his will?

But I presume Atta innocent, as he is an alleged unindicted co-conspirator.

So see, now that the defendants are on trial, you can't shift the burden of proof anymore.

The evidence shows that Atta sought to become a career airplane pilot, not a martyr. He says it right in his email.
 
I want to be the captain of a cruise ship in the Caribbean. There I said it so it must be true...
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom