KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

dudalb said:
You are a very good example of "The Truth Movement" and an good example of why it is a joke.
Click to expand...

It might be a joke to you, but mass murder is not a joke to me. You have no respect for the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed almost 3000 people. You also have no respect for the US Constitution and the presumption of innocence. Nor have you made any substantive comments on any of the 169 alleged overt acts and you probably haven't even read the article.

I knew Galileo Galilei, Galileo Galilei was a friend of mine, and you, Sir, are no Galileo Galilei.

:jaw-dropp
 
Galileo said:
It might be a joke to you, but mass murder is not a joke to me. You have no respect for the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed almost 3000 people. You also have no respect for the US Constitution and the presumption of innocence. Nor have you made any substantive comments on any of the 169 alleged overt acts and you probably haven't even read the article.

I knew Galileo Galilei, Galileo Galilei was a friend of mine, and you, Sir, are no Galileo Galilei.

:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
 
cyclonic said:
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
Click to expand...

twice is not equal to "over and over again".

And I always expect the same results at the JREF denier forum.
 
Redtail said:
Yes. When do you plan on turning over your "analysis" to KSM's defense team?
Click to expand...

It's online. I doubt they will pay attention to it anyway, they are public pretenders. Government run healthcare, government run legal services, it's all the same.
 
Galileo said:
It's online.
Click to expand...
So, send them a link

I doubt they will pay attention to it anyway, they are public pretenders. Government run healthcare, government run legal services, it's all the same.
Click to expand...
Well you have a point there. I mean what Public Defender would want to provide evidence that his/her client, who is accused of the biggest crime in America's history btw, is innocent? After all how would they turn getting KSM found innocent into anything useful as far as a legal career goes.

Not to mention the absolute pointlessness of such a high profile event causing mainstream America to start questioning 9/11 (If he didn't do it who did!?!?!?) thus validating the truth movement and likely getting that new investigation. Nah... that would mean you would have to do something as arduous as send an email and you'd have to care about the 3,000+ who died on 9/11, the thousands who have died in the events since then, the constitution, hell justice in general...
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
DoD press releases are not evidence.

The computer in DoD custody is not KSM's, nor do any communications from it to other defendants exist, hence the computer is not an overt act.

None of the "evidence" cited on the DoD press release has any known connection to the charge sheet.

Also, it says the computer had a photo of Atta on it. Well, I'm sure you have a photo of Atta on your computer as well, as does Fox News, CBS, NBC, etc. In fact, anyone who read the online news in the days after 9/11 probably has a photo of Atta on their computer. Alleged overt act # 165 says that KSM recorded the news on 9/11 and up until 9/21, so he would obviously have a photo of Atta on his computer.

Also, Barrett did not ignore the DoD "fact" sheet. I did.
Click to expand...

:dl: Yeah, trying using the ostrich defense in federal court sometime.

"But your honor, if I don't believe this evidence exists, then it cannot. Why can't you understand this?"
 
Galileo said:
Because I wrote most of the article, that's how.
Click to expand...

Are you aware that your co-author is a Holocaust denier, wife-beater and self-described Al-Queada supporter who calls for the whole world to be "slaves to Allah"?

EDIT: Almost forgot, when Barrett starts losing an argument... or when he begins an argument... he'll talk about how his critics will be executed for disagreeing with him at a future date.
 
Last edited:
triforcharity said:
So, you are Rolf Lindgren? Damn, not we can't call him a moron anymore, because your here.
Click to expand...

But we can talk about how the historical Galileo was likely an incestuous child molester and if he were re-born today, would probably be a sociopathic serial killer and how terrible it would be if there were a person with that level of moral depravity pissing on peoples graves to stroke his own ego.
 
Last edited:
jaydeehess said:
Galileo,

When they said “we are a small group (2-3) of joung [sic] men from different arab countries… We would like to start training for the career of airline professional pilots.” why is this evidence that they did not want to learn to fly in order to carry out suicide hijackings?

Does Rolf or Barrett expect that they would have stated that they wished to learn to fly aircraft so that they could hijack them, fly them into targets that are the symbols of the wealth and power of their infidel enemies, and kill as many of their enemies as possible?
Click to expand...

Galileo said:
you are presuming Atta is guilty. A man on trial is presumed innocent. According to the email, Atta wants a career as an airline pilot.
Click to expand...

On the contrary, Rolf assumed that he was telling the truth. I am asking why a guilty person would tell the truth in this case.
Is this the sole reason for Rolf to assert that they were actually wanting only to become airline pilots?
 
Galileo said:
It might sound suspicious to you because you are a conspiracy theorist. It sounds to me like he spoke poor English.
Click to expand...
Getting angry when asked why you have no return ticket is due to not speaking good English?

Even if it was suspicious, it is not proof he was in a plot to committ mass murder.

According to your logic, anyone who does anything you deem suspicious is guilty of mass murder.
Click to expand...

Actually no, it was reason to not allow him into the USA. Sorry them's the brakes. You act in any way that the immigration officer does not trust and you get bounced. That is the way it is and should be. No trial since this is not a crime. Its simply a gate at the door.

However getting bounced due to suspicious behaviour and then having other evidence that you actually were planning on participating in mass murder, well its not exactly a point for the defense now is it?

ITS JUST THE BEGINNING!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom