KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

[TJM]

That's where the toilets empty. I'll pass...

Need I remind you; You're in a Galileo thread.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

Need I remind you; You're in a Galileo thread.

Good point.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

The email is evidence that Atta wanted to be a career airline pilot. If you presume Atta is innocent, just take what he says at face value.

I would not believe what a terrorist says anyway.

Hmm...

 

[TexasJack]

Hmm...

You have to understand, Atta was just a mild-mannered airline pilot.

 

[Galileo]

BONUS

Conspiracy Theory: 911 Episode 2 Parts 1 thru 6
http://www.911blogger.com/node/22098

with Jesse Ventura!

 

[JamesB]

The feds wouldn't want the jury to know Atta was in a PhD program) if such a claim is true).

The feds will do anything possible to keep this out of admitted evidence.

The more the jury knows about the identities of the 19 alleged hijackers (besides the stuff the feds say in press releases), the more difficult to picture them committing a heinous crime.

If it does make its way into evidence, I am certain the the feds will use your spin. You are very good at spin.

It is too bad that you don't use your excellent communication skills for good, rather than for evil.

That makes absolutely no sense, even by truther standards. Although I know it interferes with your whole "Arabs living in caves" narrative.

Why are you questioning whether it is true that Atta was in a PhD program? It is a fact which is not contested by anyone, and there would be absolutely no reason to falsify it. You guys will accept any unrealiable rumor unquestionably, but you get skeptical about even most prosaic fact if it is inconvenient.

 

[332nd]

BONUS

Conspiracy Theory: 911 Episode 2 Parts 1 thru 6
http://www.911blogger.com/node/22098

with Jesse Ventura!

Are you going to send KSM's defense team a link to your evidence?

ETA:

The feds wouldn't want the jury to know Atta was in a PhD program) if such a claim is true).

This was at my Alma Mater. I'll tell them if you're afraid to.

 

[Galileo]

That makes absolutely no sense, even by truther standards. Although I know it interferes with your whole "Arabs living in caves" narrative.

Why are you questioning whether it is true that Atta was in a PhD program? It is a fact which is not contested by anyone, and there would be absolutely no reason to falsify it. You guys will accept any unrealiable rumor unquestionably, but you get skeptical about even most prosaic fact if it is inconvenient.

I'm not contesting it, I'm just saying I haven't heard about it before.

I don't think Atta ever lived in a cave, never heard that one either.

The jury would never believe that a Christian guy in a PhD program for architecture would want to become a martyr.

 

[Galileo]

Hmm...

Atta was not a terrorist, he was a Christian. Please see alleged overt act # 67.

 

[Galileo]

Need I remind you; You're in a Galileo thread.

That's right. Things are not going to go quite so easy, we are bringing in the big guns.

 

[funk de fino]

"I knew Galileo Galilei, Galileo Galilei was a friend of mine, and you, Sir, are no Galileo Galilei."

That'll be a yes then?

 

[cyclonic]

that's right. We are bringing in the big guns.

I'm scared!

 

[332nd]

I'm not contesting it, I'm just saying I haven't heard about it before.

I don't think Atta ever lived in a cave, never heard that one either.

The jury would never believe that a Christian guy in a PhD program for architecture would want to become a martyr.

Because there are no Christian martyrs?

BTW:Are you going to send KSM's defense team a link to your evidence?

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Atta was not a terrorist, he was a Christian. Please see alleged overt act # 67.

Point #67, from the article you co-wrote with the Holocaust-denying, jew-hating, wife-beating islamic fascist :

67. On or about December 11, 2000, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) ordered flight deck videos for the Boeing 767 Model 300ER and the Airbus A320-200 from Sporty’s Pilot Shop in Batavia, Ohio.

 

[triforcharity]

Atta was not a terrorist, he was a Christian. Please see alleged overt act # 67.

And nobody thought that a mild mannered guy next door would be killing guys and putting them in his basement and walls either. But yet, John Gasey did just that.

Aalso, IIRC, it was back in the 1980's, and there was a string of arson fires. There was one person setting all the fires. Nobody would have thought it would have been an arson investigator from a local department, but it was.

 

[Galileo]

Point #67, from the article you co-wrote with the Holocaust-denying, jew-hating, wife-beating islamic fascist :

"I knew Kevin Barrett, Kevin Barrett was a friend of mine, and you, Sir, are no Kevin Barrett."

 

[Galileo]

And nobody thought that a mild mannered guy next door would be killing guys and putting them in his basement and walls either. But yet, John Gasey did just that.

Aalso, IIRC, it was back in the 1980's, and there was a string of arson fires. There was one person setting all the fires. Nobody would have thought it would have been an arson investigator from a local department, but it was.

you have the burden of proof.

John Gasey is not a defendant in this trial.

Are you saying that all Chritians are terrorist martyrs?

 

[triforcharity]

No, stop with the strawman.

People do things that are unexpected all the time.

Hell, I once drank Captain Morgan after I swore it off many years ago.

Are you saying that just because some is a Christian, they can't be a terrorist?

 

[carlitos]

Are you saying that all Chritians are terrorist martyrs?

Yes, that's obviously what he's saying. Super argument there.

 

[JamesB]

OK, I will bite. How the #^$% did you come up with Atta being a Christian?