Just More Bigfoot Stuff With Identity Of Bigfoot

[TEABERRYEAGLE]

It was suggested that you might like to read my reply to the "Bigfoot" issue that I started....

Not to try to blast everyone in the comic section, let me go ahead and give
you the facts as I see them. Read the book below, as it turned out to
appear. And, I know this will be unbelievable to the believers and
halarious to you others, but, let it be known you heard it from me. You
have my name in the profile if you want to contact me. And, I will try to
"copy and paste" this everywhere I can so I will at least have the credit
for my great discoveies and insights. I'm sorry if I "knock-in-the-head",
all the planned, expensive.......that I never went on......expeditiions that
are planned. I'm sure a lot of folks are going to be disappointed, when they start checking some of the evidence I'm now giving, even if it seems
farfetched..

What you see, in the films and photos are the real thing.......just that
nobody wants to know it/believe it and would rather "throw stones", and I
don't know if you want this information either. If you would rather keep
believing the "Mystic" and all the experts thinking, then you shouldn't read
any further. I may start you onto something that will scare the "S___" out
of you.

Bigfoot, as I can determine, is of the "Alein " species. The head has most
of the features of a pig.......I've coined the name "PIGI" for this "being" , go ahead and take your snicker,and may refer to it this way below. The snout is a shortened version of a trunk and its overall appearance is definitely grotesque. Probably the reason for the "costume" , I'll mention below, as seeing it's face and body may scare the "S___" out of you. The hand and feet, as we know them, are still that of a pig. The hand has the four parts of a pigs foot, but flexible and adapted for use as a hand, only four fingers (and can be seen in the Patterson film if you want to check). The feet are, of course cloven and still make this track, the cloven step with the following two indentations, as on the pig's foot when they hit the ground. And, I'm sure you've seen pig's feet at your local Supermarket, if not go check this in the meat counter, under "Pigs Feet"! LOL! Folks, having some farm
experience already know this and can visualize what I'm saying...I think in
one of the articles I read, someone had tracked one to a pond where all he
could see there were cow's tracks....of course, these tracks would fit right
in and were probably as big as the cow's. It was also mentioned that they were studying the foot pad forward of the tracks.........this is made by the "fake" footpads and the angle of the leg and the cloven hoof. In one of the photos, of the man looking at a few casts on a table, you should notice that a couple of them have what appears to be arch and ankle straps. And, if you look closely at all of them, you will see the evidence of the cloven hoof and a few comical ones where they have made their image.....this will also be noted below.

And, again, let it be known that you heard it from me, the footprints being found are being said to not be able to be recognized, because you're looking for a human type track and not that of a cloven footed animal/PIGI. Go back and look at all the photos of tracks, especially the ones gathered from the snow, and why they can't be identified and see tracks like that of a pig or cow. You will see the beginning edge as two sharp indentations, followed by the two pointed indentations. This is the type of foot that can make the deep imprints everyone is talking about The footprints that can't be recognized, of the ones in the tire tracks, in the middle of the road, are not footprints, but indentations of the juvenile PIGI lying in the sand.. It was discused in one article I read that they couldn't understand the foot forward appearance of the tracks......a leg and foot of the type I'm talking about would make this on the fake footpads.

My fossil footprint, where I got my first look, telling me they've been
around from "time beginning", as I originally noted, is that of an adult
and juvenile, as I interpret it.

Their limbs are actually quite small in diameter as I'll now discuss. And,
I think the folks that believe they can disappear, are on the right track.
I think their "Ride" and themselves, can "cloak" themselves and also, that
they may have the "cremelion",sp, capability....guess this is cloaking.
They're there, but you don't see them or they disappear before your eyes. I haven't heard anyone say they knew where they went. I, also, have some photos of their images, taken more recently, at another location, that give me this thought.

An aside: I, think the photo of the "Yeti" footprint in the snow, that I
mentioned sold for 3,5oo pounds, is actually a hand print. The "Hand",
would still have the joint a the joint where the hoof bends and provides
their version of the heel of the palm. This could have made such a clear
print, with the palm and two fingers. I can't see where the toe of a cloven
hoof slid under the snow in this photo. The actual footprint in this photo,
though, as I believe are the two indendations at the upper boarder, of the
splayed track of a cloven hoof, as that of the "Buck" deer.......hunter's
know this track.......they may have a more valuable print than they
think.

Now, in the "Jacob's" photos, I believe, where you view the three
photos.........the first is of the two bear cubs, OK, and the other two are
of the PIGI. The second photo is of the PIGI bending over and the third,
where it's sitting down.......the first one, and you'll have to look at the
original, and not the cropped, you'll see an infant, all snuggled in a fur
lined cradle in the lower edge of the photo.......everyone missed this, I'm
sure, as they are critiquing the one animal, and this is where you should
start realizing it isn't an animal, in the general sense. The second photo
shows it nursing one baby, while the second baby, is still comfortably
snuggled in its cradle. I can also see, in the photo of it bending down,
that there is an opening in the "costume", that I still think they are
wearing, under the left armpit. Although, where it is nursing and has an
outstretched arm, I didn't try to look for this feature.

I'm afraid it's "YOUR" photos that is letting me find out all this
information, and I kinda' am getting used to seeing the little things that
are in them. Thank you all for having had them published. I hope your
monetary awards are great.

Now, for seeing their identity as not being the burly beings discussed by
everyone, I have found, from the "Patterson" still frame, being shown on
these sites, that there are emblems, of some sort, on the back and legs.
While looking at this, I can see some sort of apparatus under the fur giving
the large appearance. This is one of the places I saw what I thought could
be a weapon, strapped to its back and later in its hands. Analysing the
emblems, you guess where they came from. The outfit, I noticed has a belt
and there are two seams along the right shoulder. The outfit stops just
below the knee area and there is an apparatus connected to its leg and going
to the foot, and I'm surmising there is a human type footpad attached. I
think this is where the "footprints" are made that the plaster casts have
come from, as presented in other photos. In another of these photos, where
the man is looking at one of his casts, and there are several on the table,
you'll see on a couple of the casts what appears to be straps, surely
overlooked because the footpad is of the only interest. In an additional
photo entry, of what is supposed to be the "buttocks", with the reaching arm
and hand........I think, is really where a decapitated PIGI fell. What I'm
seeing in this photo....the right arm reaching, the chest imprint and in the
right corner is the face/head. This will be your first view of the "Alein"
appearance.....and this interpretation came from me The other folks, with
the big foot casts, may have one of the PIGI'S fakes. You'll have to
understand here, that all this is my interpretation of the photos that I
looked at and you can take it for what it's worth, so to speak.

I've watched the film of the "Yeti", and feel this is where a great
opportunity to make contact with one of the PIGI'S was lost. If you'll
notice in one frame, as it starts to go out of sight, that it stops, looks
toward the photographer, and lifts its left arm and hand, in a "Goodbye"
attidude. Really don't know how the photographer could have responded to
this, though! Upon analysing this film, the fur outfit is also
recognized........there is a definite space below the knee and the same at
the arm......where there is a "gauntlet" as I would call it, from the elbow
area to the hand. Also, this one has something in its "hands", but can't
make it out completely, but has the shape of the crossbow. This was the
same in the "Patterson" film.

And, the other "Yeti" photo, of the one on the snow top mountain, can also
be seen as the PIGI. I discovered the way to determine all this while
viewing my fossils.

Now, I will drop the big one, since it goes along with the above, and since
folks will be trying my discovery technique, for which - now, I won't be
getting my millions, and you will hear of all the new discoveries they will
be able to make and take the credit for. I'll try to post the same
information on various sites, and maybe someone will recognize they heard
something like this somewhere, LOL!!.

1. All the statues on "Easter Island" were made by the PIGI. The statues
that are being "righted" on new bases, are not how they were intended to
look. All the stones, that were strewn around and probably gone now,
created this special scene, and will, now, have destroyed the signivicance
of this particular scene. Their lying position created a scene when viewed
from above, that I can interpret, from one of the original photos, that
were taken in an aerial view. All the folks over there on the expensive
expeditions, and you can see here that I'm just jealous about it, are
"looking for answers in all the wrong places". Guess I may be sorry later
for saying this. Just don't sue me. LOL!!

2. I think the pyramids were built by the PIGI, as I don't think any human
type would have had the intelligence to accomplish this feat, with all the
tunnels and shafts, etc. This is the creation of super intelligence. To
add something for you to think about...... why are all the stonework looking
so random? I've used photos, I've found on the site, that were taken by
others, and can see the images of the PIGI. They are such great thinkers,
that they can lay these stones at various angles, for the whole pyramid, and
that you can take one stone and see an image, then take a small group, see
a different image, and so on for the whole side, where you'll see another
image. And, you can start rotating each of these images, 90 left and get
another image for each for the whole 360. Who or what can create something
with this complexity.???? On the side facing the Spynx, it looks like
something crawling to the top. I think, by removing the outer coating, as we
are told was done, that this opens up the "Art" that is found there. I
will never know if I should have told all this!!!!!!!

3. I think all the structures in South America, were built by them....PIGI
appearance is here, also!

4. I think that the Spynx once had a short snout instead of a
nose.......PIGI images abound here and the work they are doing here will
never be what the original looked like. I examined an original photo and
can readilly interpret how it once looked.

5. The stones of "Stonehenge" have PIGI images as part of the appearance.
The one they call the "Base Stone", is the image of a lion.

6. Upon examining "Ayer's Rock" in Austrailia, from the great photos that
can be found of it, there are indentations, which they have named, but are
the shape of the PIGI. You can see why I need an expert to follow my
assertions.

7. And, here's the one that will make disbelievers of you all, of all the
things I've said above......enhancing sections of the "Moon" and "Mars",
show images of the PIGI. In other words, they don't have to fly to "Mars"
to see if there was ever life there.......there may still be, LOL!!

And as for the flying saucers.......I was taking pictures of the Sunrise, a
couple Saturdays ago, when I thought this one little, dark ring-of-a-cloud
was moving faster than the others. I started clicking it, and have about
ten photos, and recorded its movement for a couple minutes and found it
definitely progressing faster, as referenced by the other objects in the
photos, poles, etc.! And, I don't know what to make of it......you can now
think what you want.

I welcome some archeologist's, paleontoligist's and anthropoligist's input,
if there be some listening. And now, how is it said, "Thank You and
Goodnight"..........(hope you overlooked my spelling)

 

[Drewbot]

Someone wants their own thread I see...

What photograph do you have of the sphinx? I thought cameras were invented in the 1800's, you say you have an original photo dating how far back?

 

[TEABERRYEAGLE]

The photo I'm referring to, is one before they added the extend front legs.....got it from one of these websites....

 

[zombiebex]

Out of curiosity, what would it take to make you believe that Bigfoot does NOT exist?

 

[Tirdun]

Why did you put this on the HLA thread, Teaberryeagle? There are already four or five Bigfoot threads on G,S,P. I could even understand Yet Another BF thread there, given your ... unique take on the beast.

 

[TEABERRYEAGLE]

Just More Bigfoot Stuff

I added this thread "here" so everyone that is not into the "Bigfoot" thing would be aware of a few more reasons to know it existed and to think it is still around, if it is still being seen. I only checked the videos and photos on the different sites for this comment. My actual experience, and I cannot be convinced otherwise, is from the various fossils I've examined. I am really concerned about the excavations and research that is going on in all areas without these folks not having more insight into what they're finding They are still looking for the "big" bones and overlooking the "treasure trove" of bones related to my discoveries, as I'll mention below.

Here is an article that I just submitted to a couple other forums, that may duplicate some of the information I've already noted here, but may give you some more "food-for-thought". Kinda' long, but you will make it through, lol!!

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

I, Harry W. McCormack, have valuable informatiion that I think is imperetive
to the excavations and research going on around the world. I'm sure all
paleontoligists, archeoligists, anthropologists, etc. are not ready to
believe what I am about to present.
I have been researching fossil finds and have discovered an existance on
this esrth that no one has ever considered or would ordinarily know how to
recognize. I have the evidence of these discoveries (one dinosaur
researchers will be most interested in - a 3 mm long dinosaur...wings and
head like a horse) and don't know how to present present them other than in
Forums and Blogs.
To begin,"Lucy" is evidence that you already have at the Museum in Houston
and you can look at her picture to realize what I'm going to talk about.
These inhabitants began as such a miniture, that you have to view them
through high magnifications. And, they apparently have evolved from this
size to the size of "Lucy" and then to, and I hate to say this at this point
as it will began to put disbelief into this writing,the "Bigfoot",
"Sasquatch", "Yeti"etc.......they're all the same as I can determine.
There description of these inhabitants: Heads resembling that of a "Pig",
but the snout looks like a short elephant's trunk, feet are "cloven" and
hands are four fingered, as of the cloven hoofs, but have been adapted for
use as hands. This can readily be determined from some of the videos taken
of the Bigfoot and YEti, their footprints are "cloven", except when they
have the large human footpads attached and wearing the fur camoflage.
At this point I had better point out a couple things you will need as
evidence. Consider the bones from "Lucy"....look at the cloven foot, obvious
in the photos, and the bone structure of the leg (and I'm sure this could
not be explained by anyone until my explanation)that is that of the "Pig".
The detail is obvious if taken in this concept. And, the bones and teeth of
the mouth are aligned like the animal (jaw of a pig if looked at closely).
Let it be known that these discoveries came from Harry W. McCormack.
And, in an ongoing excavation by Dr. Robert Bakker,I observed, where they
think they have bones of amphibians,but they have skulls with the features
of the "Pig". I call these inhabitants, "PIGI" for lack of a better
description. Be sure to notice all the miniture bones in that excavation's
photo.
Now, back to the beginning...I have this little, and I'm pretty sure it's a
dinosaur, with wings and a head shaped like a horse. I have a fossil
footprint that can only be related to the shape of a pig's, the cloven hoof.
This is why the "Bigfoot's" footprints are never recognized, The ones I have
seen in the videos on the "Bigfoot" link are definitely cloven and the
observers there can't make them out because they're looking for a human
print. You can also see the imprint of the cloven hoof on some of the
plaster casts that have been made, if observed closely. There's always the
footprints of cloven hoofs in the videos and photos.
And, in one of the photos, being blasted on the Bigfoot link, where they are
trying to see if the beast is a Bigfoot, they complelely overlook an infant,
"Bigfoot", snugly wrapped in fur and sitting in a cradle, in the lower
border of the photo, I think "Jacob's" beast. This should be an immediate
alert that this is no animal. AND, THIS IS YOUR FIRST LOOK AT THE FACE OF A
"BIGFOOT". I have observed the fur "gauntlet" on their arms and the aparatus
under the fur and insignias on the fur in the Patterson/Grimlin video.
No one has ever accurately described their face, because, I think, they are
looking for a human type. The face is actually very groteaque, the shape of
the pig, with the large mouth and extended snout......the face will always
look alongated...you can tell if you are looking at one from this
description.
I observed the photo of the bones just discovered on the Natonal Geographic
website and there are bones of these "beings" in clear view along with some
other animals. This excavation is a treasure trove of the bones of these
"beings" when they were in the small stage of their evolution. I observed
them, along with their little cloven hoofs protruding from the dirt, and are
probably being destroyed since they are not recognized as a valuable
discovery.
Along with my discoveries I have also found that they created all the great
sculptures being found that folks don't know who created them. Also, their
pictures are all over these items...they left them everywhere they
went........and I found that there must have been millions...in the eons
past. I also noted that the miniture beings perished in a great
castrophe....there is evidence that they perished as they stood. As, if
something happened, that killed everything in an instant. I don't have the
proper knowledge of these things for a scientific explanation, but just
observing what is obvious. Even the insects perished, but they appear to be
standing in something that held them, and they all are in a posture of
attacking another insect.
In a lot of the fossils, there can be seen the evidence that they tried to
camflage themselves while they were living, as there is a cover, like a
netting thrown over them. It will be a ring with the fabric attached and can
be seen in all the fossils. And, the fossils are either in the form of
fossilized or just attached. There may be enough for DNA's........don't know
how much is needed for this.
My observation, from researching the fossils, and there is much more needed
for this by someone with the proper background, is that they are very highly
inteligent, great artists and sculptures. They fought battles, apparently,
as some have on "Medevial" armour and swords. There appears to be horses,
from their engravings. They must have been sexually active.....there are
evidence of this. It is also noted on the Egyptian website on the knife
handles pictured there, since I know how to recognize the scenes depicted on
these things. And, the pictures on the caves, etc., thought to have been
made by ancient indians, etc. were actually made by them. Look at the
pictures and you will see the pig face everywhere. I can only check these
things from the great photographs entered on the various websites. Thanks to
everyone for this. I have other great observations that will be shared
later.
This is my physical evidence of this miniture existance:
1. A fossil footprint...
2. Gold Nails through heads or used as eyes...
3. A fishook......and other metals.
4. A type of metal resembling aluminum roofing ....
5. Monofilimant type lines......either it is line or their hair..
6. A Gold Needle with the monofilament type thread attached and stuck
through a ball of thread
7. Fossil evidence of various creatures........
8. Fossil evidence of the miniture inhabitants......either fossilized of
just adhering to the rocks..
9. Portion of miniture necklace, with the miniture stones....
10. A miriad of insects....still posing as they perished....
11. The 3mm dinosaur.....almost, sure...
12. Various articles of sculpture, pieces of gold flake and stones...can
only be seen through 10x jeweler's loop or microscope...
I determined that these beings were of great intelligence from the
discoveries I have made. I will have to make some of this evidence available
at another writing.

 

[madurobob]

TBE, I've asked you this before and received no response. I'll ask again:

What is your specific expertise in paleontology, fossil identification, bone structure analysis, and early humon/proto-human development? Where and how did you hone your skills in these areas?

 

[TEABERRYEAGLE]

TBE, I've asked you this before and received no response. I'll ask again:

What is your specific expertise in paleontology, fossil identification, bone structure analysis, and early humon/proto-human development? Where and how did you hone your skills in these areas?

Sorry I overlooked your first question, madurobob...and this answer is not to seem like a "smart aleck", but want you to know you can do the same thing.....I have no experience or formal training in paleontology..........my education is a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and am a retired Senior Utility Engineer.......I can only use the physical evidence I can view with my eyes...guess from being an ole farm boy, I can easily recognize the difference between a pile of "horse manure" and "cow manure and when hunting in the snow, I can readilly tell the difference between a deer track and a rabbit track, LOL!!

Just think the folks with thr formal educations in those fields, don't want to see the "forest for the trees". The easiest way to study the fossils, is to photograph them, download them to the computer and take a close look.......or do like the professionals do, get my 10 power jeweler's loop out and take a close look......I'm sure the experts are doing this......in my case, I have developed some kinda' way of seeing everything in front of me and not really knowing what the scientific name for the different compounds are that make up the rocks, but can readilly see the things attached or embedded in them.

My discovery is that there are things there that can readilly be seen, but must not have been considered possible by the experts........they want to think everything is formed by nature in some manner....I have actually shown them to a couple archeologists, who see what I see, but don't want to acknowledge that it is possible........not within their training, so-to-speak....

I have enlightened the dark photos of the "Bigfoot" that are seen on the websites, and that is where I discovered the "JUVENILE BIGFOOT" for all the world to see....on the dark photos of the "Jacob's Beast", they concentrated on the large animal in the photo and completely overlooked the baby, snuggled comfortably in a fur cradle, and in plain view at the lower edge of the photo...your first look at the face of the real thing....a "Bigfoot".......and, therefore, not just a dumb animal.......

I worked with the photo from the Patterson/Grimlin video and discovered the fur "suit", as everyone has, but here also there were some important things overlooked.....the suit is on the legitimate "Bigfoot", the apparatus that holds the large animal shape is determined and the lower leg with another apparatus for holding the footpad, can be seen..looking closely at the extended arm, a gauntlet type sleeve is visible and the four "fingers" (of a cloven hoof) can be seen...and you have to see the face to know you have the "Bigfoot".....it's there!!.........

I hope I have the "credit" for making this information available...........

In the case of making a judgement on the "LUCY" fossils, it is definitely just my observation,.......from the great photo provided on the website, the "cloven" foot is readily decernable on the lower left leg bone....if looked at in this manner, and the bone joint above it just looks like what you'd expect to see in the "Pig" or other four legged animal.....and, as for the other bones I'm seeing in the excavations around the world, since I can enhance their photos, you can recognize a "cloven hoof" or other form of animal with very little trouble...seems like the enhanced photos make them easily seen.....the archeologists in the field should be able to do this at the site......they would probably have an easier job......I have the photos I have studied for this determination...and, all the photos the folks have taken of the "'Bigfoor" that I have seen, have the real thing.......

 

[TEABERRYEAGLE]

Out of curiosity, what would it take to make you believe that Bigfoot does NOT exist?

Just wanted to answer your inquiry.......think I'm gonna' have to keep believing and don't think there is anything to make me not want to........."seen" too many things to make me a believer........thanks for asking......

 

[Biscuit]

Just wanted to answer your inquiry.......think I'm gonna' have to keep believing and don't think there is anything to make me not want to........."seen" too many things to make me a believer........thanks for asking......

I am sure I am not the first to ask you this but here we go...

1. Please provide the photo of the sphinx.

2. Please provide the photo of 'lucy's' hoof

3. Please provide the photos of fossils

4. Please provide photos of the moon and mars that show the features you describe.

No excuses, no stalling. Provide the evidence or admitt you have none. Once you provide the 4 above requested items I have a few more for you. In return I will answer any questions you have of me. Thanks and have a pigi day!

 

[petra10]

Yes I too would have to see photos of your evidence before I could comment.

 

[TEABERRYEAGLE]

I HAVE INSERTED A PHOTO OF THE BABY SASQUATCH'/BIGFOOTK, I'VE COINED THE NAME OF "PIGI" FOR IT, INTO MY PROFILE FOR ALL TO SEE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IT CAME FROM HARRY W. McCORMACK........THIS IS THE BABY, SNOOZING COMFORTABLY IN IT'S "FUR-LINED"........"BASKET".........THAT WAS FOUND BY ME, SINCE EVERYONE ELSE WAS TRYING TO "DEBUNK" THE PHOTO OF THE "JACOB'S BEAST" FROM THE HUNTER IN PENNSYLVANIA.....THIS INFANT AND THE "FURLINED BASKED" CAN BE VIEEWED IN TWO OF HIS PHOTOS......JUST EXAMINE THE AREA NEAR THE LOWER BORDR..........THIS IS A LOOK INTO THE FACE OF THE "ANIMAL"........CAN YOU CALL IT AN ANIMAL NOW? iF YOU DIDNPT SEE THIS FACE, THAT I'VE DESCRIBED IN MY THREADS, THEN YOU HAVEN'S SEEN THE BF, ETC.!!

 

[wahrheit]

1) The picture in your profile does not show anything I could even remotely discern.

2) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ALL UPPERCASE, it is very annoying.

3) Why is this thread in History, Literature, and the Arts?

 

[quixotecoyote]

I HAVE INSERTED A PHOTO OF THE BABY SASQUATCH'/BIGFOOTK, I'VE COINED THE NAME OF "PIGI" FOR IT,

I think "Irregular black blurred oval with smaller pink blurred streaks" would be a much more fitting name.

 

[bruto]

I was going to try a detailed response, but it's hopeless. Anyone who can tell us without telltale smilies that the Patterson Gimlin film is of an extraterrestrial pig wearing a bigfoot costume is...I don't know. Words fail.

Why is it so hard to make contact with a pigi. After all, throughout history they have been busily building all our monuments and structures. Visible or not, somebody must have figured something funny was going on when pyramids and sphinxes and colossal heads and the like started sprouting up around them. Do you suppose people just get used to that sort of thing and lose their curiosity?

 

[GT/CS]

I was going to try a detailed response, but it's hopeless. Anyone who can tell us without telltale smilies that the Patterson Gimlin film is of an extraterrestrial pig wearing a bigfoot costume is...I don't know. Words fail.

Why is it so hard to make contact with a pigi. After all, throughout history they have been busily building all our monuments and structures. Visible or not, somebody must have figured something funny was going on when pyramids and sphinxes and colossal heads and the like started sprouting up around them. Do you suppose people just get used to that sort of thing and lose their curiosity?

The similarities to Historian are just a little to freaky.

The comparison of the two personalities might make a fascinating doctorate paper for some psychiatry grad student.

 

[fuelair]

I HAVE INSERTED A PHOTO OF THE BABY SASQUATCH'/BIGFOOTK, I'VE COINED THE NAME OF "PIGI" FOR IT, INTO MY PROFILE FOR ALL TO SEE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IT CAME FROM HARRY W. McCORMACK........THIS IS THE BABY, SNOOZING COMFORTABLY IN IT'S "FUR-LINED"........"BASKET".........THAT WAS FOUND BY ME, SINCE EVERYONE ELSE WAS TRYING TO "DEBUNK" THE PHOTO OF THE "JACOB'S BEAST" FROM THE HUNTER IN PENNSYLVANIA.....THIS INFANT AND THE "FURLINED BASKED" CAN BE VIEEWED IN TWO OF HIS PHOTOS......JUST EXAMINE THE AREA NEAR THE LOWER BORDR..........THIS IS A LOOK INTO THE FACE OF THE "ANIMAL"........CAN YOU CALL IT AN ANIMAL NOW? iF YOU DIDNPT SEE THIS FACE, THAT I'VE DESCRIBED IN MY THREADS, THEN YOU HAVEN'S SEEN THE BF, ETC.!!

What did he take the picture with? There is no kind of detail to examine or make any determination of what is there - whether real or fake. Simply a nearly rectangular brownish mass.

 

[madurobob]

What did he take the picture with? There is no kind of detail to examine or make any determination of what is there - whether real or fake. Simply a nearly rectangular brownish mass.

See my response to this on TBE's other thread. Its the base of the salt lick the hunters left out in the "Jacobs Creature" pictures (can be seen in LTC's "Juvenile Bigfoot" thread). The salt lick, upright in the first pic, was turned over by the bear cubs and the base is visible in the second pic... and miraculously transformed into a baby bigfoot basket.

 

[madurobob]

Sorry I overlooked your first question, madurobob...and this answer is not to seem like a "smart aleck", but want you to know you can do the same thing.....I have no experience or formal training in paleontology..........my education is a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and am a retired Senior Utility Engineer.......I can only use the physical evidence I can view with my eyes...guess from being an ole farm boy, I can easily recognize the difference between a pile of "horse manure" and "cow manure and when hunting in the snow, I can readilly tell the difference between a deer track and a rabbit track, LOL!!

You n me both, TBE. Grew up on a farm, spent most of my formative years in the woods.

The easiest way to study the fossils, is to photograph them, download them to the computer and take a close look.......or do like the professionals do, get my 10 power jeweler's loop out and take a close look......I'm sure the experts are doing this......in my case, I have developed some kinda' way of seeing everything in front of me and not really knowing what the scientific name for the different compounds are that make up the rocks, but can readilly see the things attached or embedded in them.

Unfortunately, studying pictures is NOT the preferred method. What you get in studying photos is a mix of results made up of the actual image plus artifacts created by the camera, the developing process, the printing process, etc... This is especially evident in low resolution digital images because you can blow them up on your computer far beyond the point where image resolution conveys useful information. Using a 10x lupe will show you defects in the paper as much as anyting usefull in the image printed on the paper. You also lose any basis in scale.

I have enlightened the dark photos of the "Bigfoot" that are seen on the websites, and that is where I discovered the "JUVENILE BIGFOOT" for all the world to see....on the dark photos of the "Jacob's Beast", they concentrated on the large animal in the photo and completely overlooked the baby, snuggled comfortably in a fur cradle, and in plain view at the lower edge of the photo...your first look at the face of the real thing....a "Bigfoot".......and, therefore, not just a dumb animal.......

Sorry, TBE, that is simply the base of the salt lick that the bear cub flipped over. Notice the position of the base in the first pic and the position of the salt lick and your "basket" in the second pic. Notice also that these are very low res photos taken in the dark. Any lightening and enlarging you have done has exceeded the camera's capabilities and you are beginning to see artifacts created by the camera and your monitor.

In the case of making a judgement on the "LUCY" fossils, it is definitely just my observation,.......from the great photo provided on the website, the "cloven" foot is readily decernable on the lower left leg bone

Will you please provide a link to this photo?

 

[madurobob]

In the case of making a judgement on the "LUCY" fossils, it is definitely just my observation,.......from the great photo provided on the website, the "cloven" foot is readily decernable on the lower left leg bone....if looked at in this manner, and the bone joint above it just looks like what you'd expect to see in the "Pig" or other four legged animal.....

For what its worth, TBE, I am no expert in this area. But, I do have Johanson's book " “Lucy, The Beginnings of Human Kind,” (Johanson discovered Lucy). In it he explains how he worked closely with Basil Cooke, who had assembled a detailed two million year sequence of fossil pig lineages which he says was consistent over a wide geographical area. I find it amazing that a specialist in pig skeletons analyzing the Lucy bones would overlook a pig femur in the mix.