Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Freudian slip?

Dutch, remember when you posted a couple of dates without explanation? Nothing happened on those dates that you could shoehorn in and you mumbled your usual tripe.
I have a timeline with every single date you've gone on about. I call it a calendar.

The most interesting line in a post by Dutch, was a (non-quoted) line by you. How about that? :D
 
If these correlations show up repeatedly and consistently, than i am smart enough that it couldn't be just by change. The problem we are facing, is that you can;t accept the fact that this HDDesign 'research' comes to light this way.

I wouldn't share this if I wouldn't be convinced that it would statistically be impossible to occur this way. Of course, you haven't had these experiences while working with this material as I have. But first: you haven't really tried to follow these emerging patterns as logged on the timelines and second: this way you can find yourselves secure to dismiss, ignore and walk away from the opportunities that are given.
You seem to have a problem with comprehending the subjects at hand. if you want a repeatable sequence of events based on a set pare of parameters, because that's the limit your rigid 3-D perspective can comprehend, than we a re finished talking. You step aside the correlations that I have noticed and logged while working with this material.
You are allowed to say that it is just coincidence, I just tell you that how I experience it , it is all but coincidence...And yes, the difference between you and me is that I take HDDesign serious, and you don't.
The confirmation continue to show off though, wether you like it or not. repeatedly and consistently
Nope, the problem that you are still facing is that you have yet to establish “that it couldn't be just by change” (I expect you meant “chance”).

That you are “convinced that it would statistically be impossible to occur this way.” is irrelevant and without at least some attempt at a detailed statistical analysis on your part, whatever might have convinced you has absolutely nothing to do with statistics, impossible or not.

You seem to have a problem with comprehending that the subject of what “would statistically be impossible” actually involves, well, statistics. Heck Dutch, you can stop talking whenever you want but then that difference will remain between you and most everyone else. Alternatively Dutch, you can start collecting and analyzing some of the statistical data. That is if you “take HDDesign serious”. The fact is Dutch, that as you evidently have not even attempted to collect let alone analyze any statistical data about your prognostications indicates that you take neither your “HDDesign” nor what you assert “would statistically be impossible” seriously at all. If you can’t be bothered to take yourself seriously why should anyone else? If you do want to be taken seriously Dutch then you have to get serious and that means actually collecting and analyzing data statistically and, well, seriously.
 
You're an intelligent person, how culd you rule out that evolutionary development of consciousness is only limited to a biological existence here for let's say 75 years if you are Lucky?Theoretical science accepts Multi-dimensional realities, whatever the represent, they are even necessary to describe the Theory of All, of which we are still waiting ( despite Hawking promissed it 20 years ago to have it in 10 years). next generations will look at you as a Neaderthaler when it comes to understanding the interdimensional connectednes of consciusness. also in relation how we perceive the universe(S)

If you are an intelligent person how can you assert what “would statistically be impossible to occur this way” without any statistics? How can you “rule out” that these are all just your own inclinations and interpretations? Before you even attempt to ascribe any of this to some agency other than yourself, let alone some “Multi-dimensional” agency, you have to first eliminate yourself from the process. Given your own assertions relating all this (timelines, constants, themes and what have you) to just your own intuition and interpretations, the only thing about it that “would statistically be impossible to occur “ is you eliminating yourself as the sole agency behind all of it.
 
If you are an intelligent person how can you assert what “would statistically be impossible to occur this way” without any statistics? How can you “rule out” that these are all just your own inclinations and interpretations? Before you even attempt to ascribe any of this to some agency other than yourself, let alone some “Multi-dimensional” agency, you have to first eliminate yourself from the process. Given your own assertions relating all this (timelines, constants, themes and what have you) to just your own intuition and interpretations, the only thing about it that “would statistically be impossible to occur “ is you eliminating yourself as the sole agency behind all of it.

Not to mention how this ''multi-dimensional agency'' could cause a person to die or affect world events.
 
... next generations will look at you as a Neaderthaler ...

Current generations can look at some individuals as Neanderthal right now, where these individuals clearly display prehistoric magical thinking and adjust their behavior accordingly.
Some of these individuals are in fact so prehistorically aggressive, that they attempt to verbally beat their magical thinking into more modern humans. But if they could, they'd rather use a large heavy bone.
 
His condition became critical at Venus Transit timeframe, he left us physically expressing the Golden Mean in our perception of time based on the Mercurytransit of November 8, 2006 ( since 2006 linked to his posible passing), as mentioned numerous times in the HDDesign material. I have said repeatedly that Sharon 'holds the key' in the past, so now we will have to face what will be unlocked perhaps.
The trial of the Hariri case started today, a hit on the expectations posted on the timeline Q1 2014 as you all might know. ( only fot those who do follow the timelines, for the others: your remarks are irrelevant)
Together with devastation ( Haïti quake ) and Deep Impact ( as above , so below) as underlying themes. At Phi point we find the flight 522 crash prominent on the timeline in HDDesign, making it nuclear in potential.

^ A perfect example of "pretzel logic".

Circular Reasoning so twisted it's loopy like a pretzel.

"HDD is true because HDD says it's true!"
 
Zero plus zero is still zero, Dutch. All your word salad is useless. Now here's how you can be productive:

1.) Post your entire process, from start to finish, including all math formulas and graphs.
2.) Irrelevant, since you refuse to even attempt point one.

Posted for the 10th year straight.

And yet again, I will make the prediction on your HDD threads which you always end up proving correct: I predict you will not even attempt this and will instead continue on as you have for the past ten years, despite haven gotten nowhere.

The HDDesign productivity doesn't come from processes, planning nor from endlessly seeking connections. The material emerges by synchronicities and intuitive thoughts in the first place, finding confirmation instantly by applying the describes elements of HDDesign. That's been logged realtime in the material.
I do understand you want to have it structured in a way you understand our 3D reality, but unfortunately that's not how it works. You have to change your way of perspective or you will never understand
 
Dutch is mixing up things a bit more than usually ....

only the first 2 sentences should have been quote. My mistake, you know I don't quote full posts with different issues, as I expect others won't do the same. It was just a mis quote so to speak
 
If you imagine that these "correlations " exist then in your head they will show up repeatedly and consistently, Dutch.
This does not mean that they actually exist outside of your head.

Nonexistent statistics means nothing, Dutch.

The demand that we read thousands of posts to find out yet again that no explanation of HDDesign exists is absurd, Dutch :(.
From my post with the many issues that you have ignored, Dutch:

To begin with the latter: these issues have been discussed previously or referred to. Ask specifically what you don't understand, I won't spend my time on you to explain something from the start again while you don't give any notice of having read it or even tried to understand it. So be specific. You are wasting your time on me aswell this way.

Nonexistent statistics means that while working with this HDDesign material, the coincidences spin off from it for more frequently than statistically should be expected. That means, if you do your research properly. I wouldn't be here if I hadn't noticed that in the first place
 
Nope, the problem that you are still facing is that you have yet to establish “that it couldn't be just by change” (I expect you meant “chance”).

That you are “convinced that it would statistically be impossible to occur this way.” is irrelevant and without at least some attempt at a detailed statistical analysis on your part, whatever might have convinced you has absolutely nothing to do with statistics, impossible or not.

You seem to have a problem with comprehending that the subject of what “would statistically be impossible” actually involves, well, statistics. Heck Dutch, you can stop talking whenever you want but then that difference will remain between you and most everyone else. Alternatively Dutch, you can start collecting and analyzing some of the statistical data. That is if you “take HDDesign serious”. The fact is Dutch, that as you evidently have not even attempted to collect let alone analyze any statistical data about your prognostications indicates that you take neither your “HDDesign” nor what you assert “would statistically be impossible” seriously at all. If you can’t be bothered to take yourself seriously why should anyone else? If you do want to be taken seriously Dutch then you have to get serious and that means actually collecting and analyzing data statistically and, well, seriously.

I don't think you fully understand the scope of the issues at hand. When I work with HDDesign and follow the synchronistic patterns and find confirmation instantly, then there are numerous rational thought that won't. This can happen by chance ( indeed :-) ) , but when this happens repeated;y and consistently and continue to do so, than there is a problem with the expectation one could expect at random and what spins off from this HDDesign material. I don't think you fully understand that this underlying Design is so complex that you can't even determine a set of rules in order to determine. If you could, you would understand the Grand Theory of Everything, not only for 'our' dimension, but for all dimension in which consciousness resides. They occur in our reality at first sight as random and they don't follow the 3D basic set of rules. You have to change ( indeed :-) ) the way you hink about these inter-dimensional concepts. Other parts of your 'ratio' may understand this, if only you want to listen to it
 
If you are an intelligent person how can you assert what “would statistically be impossible to occur this way” without any statistics? How can you “rule out” that these are all just your own inclinations and interpretations? Before you even attempt to ascribe any of this to some agency other than yourself, let alone some “Multi-dimensional” agency, you have to first eliminate yourself from the process. Given your own assertions relating all this (timelines, constants, themes and what have you) to just your own intuition and interpretations, the only thing about it that “would statistically be impossible to occur “ is you eliminating yourself as the sole agency behind all of it.

Because I have seen so much confirmations showing up instantly while working with this stuff. Not only a few times, but continuesly.

Some 10 years ago I had to face it. While working with this stuf I saw so much coincidences showing up that I couldn't ignore it. I had to think about it a while because I was used to think in structured ways and logical cause and effct patterns. I have been an accountant of C&L you know ( the youngest in The Netherlands with a company car when I was 20, a long time ago now :-) )

Back then I understood that I was dealing with something very odd. I went against my perspective, but the more I thought about it and when these coincidences continued to show up I couldn't ignore it anymore. During the decade that followed a huge bunch of information showed up based on these same principles and that's why I share it.
 
Not to mention how this ''multi-dimensional agency'' could cause a person to die or affect world events.

We aren't at the same level of thought. HDDesign isn't causing anything.

I have never said such a thing
 
Current generations can look at some individuals as Neanderthal right now, where these individuals clearly display prehistoric magical thinking and adjust their behavior accordingly.
Some of these individuals are in fact so prehistorically aggressive, that they attempt to verbally beat their magical thinking into more modern humans. But if they could, they'd rather use a large heavy bone.

You are perfectly describing our current state of collective consciousness.

We are smart enough to go to Mars or landon comets and yet we fail to take care of our own and our planet. We only needed a few hundred years to mess it up.
 
The next generations will never have heard of you. Your HDD fantasy will die with you.

And you think you are the end of the evolution?

You have to face it sooner or later, real evolution takes place at the level of consciousness, wherever it is expressed
 
^ A perfect example of "pretzel logic".

Circular Reasoning so twisted it's loopy like a pretzel.

"HDD is true because HDD says it's true!"

I don't have to take you serious, you have repeatedly shown taht you have never tried to read or follow this HDDesign material. You just reply on stand alone quotes disregarding the whole concept, easy comments on out of context quotes. It is amazing that YOU seem to have people who agree with you without any obligations. I know this is a forum for critics, but I don't see an open mind and fair research by some of you. It is pathetic that some of you agree with eachother per definition and that it looks like discrepeancies are denied . Probably you guys and dolss feel strong to sing the same song but I am not impressed. The first one who really did his or hers homework has still to stand up. Come with specific issues and show that you know where you are talking about instead of looking at your postcount for ego building
 
Dutch is mixing up things a bit more than usually ....
only the first 2 sentences should have been quote. My mistake, you know I don't quote full posts with different issues, as I expect others won't do the same. It was just a mis quote so to speak

Right, so the first two sentences (hilited) of this post of yours:
There's even much more interesting stuff on the timeline for september 24, 2011, besides your finding. I consider it to be a synchronicity because the timeline puts it into perspective. Go give it a look
And on April 13, 2012:
These events were orders of magnitude better predictions than anything Dutch has presented.
Hilites by Daylightstar.... were supposed to be a quote? Who were you quoting? :rolleyes:

And that is supposed to explain the last sentence? No Dutch, your posts appear to be getting stranger and stranger ....
 
Last edited:
The HDDesign productivity doesn't come from processes, planning nor from endlessly seeking connections. ...

Of course it does:
Here's Dutch's process (December 2008):
... There's a thought, I give it a look and before I know it all these correlations are popping up. This is merely a psychic excercise, posted realtime so to speak.
Hilite by Daylightstar
Stuff pops into your head when you read the news, you seek and attempt to match.
It's of course a questionable process, it is after all, by your own account, merely a psychic exercise.

Not to be taken serious as such.
 
... next generations will look at you as a Neaderthaler ...
Current generations can look at some individuals as Neanderthal right now, where these individuals clearly display prehistoric magical thinking and adjust their behavior accordingly.
Some of these individuals are in fact so prehistorically aggressive, that they attempt to verbally beat their magical thinking into more modern humans. But if they could, they'd rather use a large heavy bone.
You are perfectly describing our current state of collective consciousness.

We are smart enough to go to Mars or landon comets and yet we fail to take care of our own and our planet. We only needed a few hundred years to mess it up.

No Dutch, I am talking about the deeply irrational subset of the world's population. Individuals who create irrational threads on forums and attempt to aggressively shove their psychic exercises and crackpot ideas into other people's minds.

As you full well know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom