Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
... Come with specific issues and show that you know where you are talking about instead of looking at your postcount for ego building

Right, right .... 'ego building', that is something you don't do of course :rolleyes:
Lets have a look at post #4983 and see if there is any 'ego building' quoted in there ....

For ease I have attached a screenshot of that post.


E.T.A.:
... Come with specific issues and show that you know where you are talking about ...
Okay:
Here's Dutch's process (December 2008):
... There's a thought, I give it a look and before I know it all these correlations are popping up. This is merely a psychic excercise, posted realtime so to speak.
 

Attachments

  • Post4983.jpg
    Post4983.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Dutch: Please ask questions about the issues in the "XTAL Design" idea

To begin with the latter: these issues have been discussed previously or referred to.
To begin with your continued ignorance that questions have been asked and remain unanswered:
Dutch's failed HDD fantasies and other fantasies!

Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" here?
First asked 4th November 2013.
Your assertion that such an explanation exists in this thread looks like a lie, Dutch.

Was "HDDesign is not about predictions" a lie or a mistake, Dutch?
First asked 4th November 2013.

Dutch: Show how you worked out a "grand cross" on December 26 2004
First asked 4th November 2013.

Dutch: What does "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" mean?
First asked 29th October 2013
That really should be 1881 days since that was the first unexplained mention and you have never explained it as far as I can see.

Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013

Dutch: Please show the working HDDesign calculation that matches these moon impacts
9th December 2013

Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013

Dutch: Show your (before 7 July 2005) mathematics showing 7 July 2005 is a "timing".
11th December 2013

To continue: The idiocy of asking for questions regarding issues about things that have not explained should be obvous to you, Dutch :eek:

Dutch: Please ask questions about the issues in the "XTAL Design" idea :rolleyes:!
 
I don't think you fully understand the scope of the issues at hand. When I work with HDDesign and follow the synchronistic patterns and find confirmation instantly, then there are numerous rational thought that won't. This can happen by chance ( indeed :-) ) , but when this happens repeated;y and consistently and continue to do so, than there is a problem with the expectation one could expect at random and what spins off from this HDDesign material. I don't think you fully understand that this underlying Design is so complex that you can't even determine a set of rules in order to determine. If you could, you would understand the Grand Theory of Everything, not only for 'our' dimension, but for all dimension in which consciousness resides. They occur in our reality at first sight as random and they don't follow the 3D basic set of rules. You have to change ( indeed :-) ) the way you hink about these inter-dimensional concepts. Other parts of your 'ratio' may understand this, if only you want to listen to it

We already knew that you make it up as you go along.
 
Not to mention how this ''multi-dimensional agency'' could ... affect world events.
.... HDDesign isn't causing anything.

I have never said such a thing

Actually, you sort of did, starting in your first post:

...
Now this is not about predicting future events.
It isn't about stopping patterns , it isn't about just trying to alter them. It's about changing the 'energy' involved.
...
If enough people are aware, the effects could be lessened, ...
Hilites by Daylightstar

Now, similarly to what Wolrab said, we already know that your irrational belief is not causing anything, specifically; your desired results.
But you do believe or hope for your irrational belief to cause a particular (desired by you) effect.

But as stated, it's not actually occurring. It's evidently just an irrational belief, pushed by the believer.
Nothing more.
 
The HDDesign productivity doesn't come from processes, planning nor from endlessly seeking connections. The material emerges by synchronicities and intuitive thoughts in the first place, finding confirmation instantly by applying the describes elements of HDDesign. That's been logged realtime in the material.

Normal people call that, "Making things up".

On a side note, define "connection", "material", "synchronicity", "intuitive thoughts", "elements of HDD design". I'm sure they mean something to you, but these are personal definitions of yours, and we have no idea what it is you mean.

I do understand you want to have it structured in a way you understand our 3D reality, but unfortunately that's not how it works.

You haven't yet convinced anyone it works at all.

You have to change your way of perspective or you will never understand

The only way I could change my perspective enough to make HDD make sense involves a ball peen hammer and rapid blows to my head with it. Needless to say, I will pass.
 
Timeframe around January 29 coming up ( placed on the timeline as peak Jan 27-31).
Identified underlying theme ( among others) is the March 11, 2011 quake tsunami ( nuclear).

Goro Adachi came up with the same underlying Design independently from HDDesign.

complementary again

'Insight' came through yesterday by openeing of window, 3 days prior to predetemined peak. As many time before. Intuitive thought, application of the Golden Mean and it showed up, that's how it works.

This is not a post in order to convince you or as part of a discussion.

It is posted in order to make a subtle expression possible
 
Last edited:
I don't think you fully understand the scope of the issues at hand. When I work with HDDesign and follow the synchronistic patterns and find confirmation instantly, then there are numerous rational thought that won't. This can happen by chance ( indeed :-) ) , but when this happens repeated;y and consistently and continue to do so, than there is a problem with the expectation one could expect at random and what spins off from this HDDesign material. I don't think you fully understand that this underlying Design is so complex that you can't even determine a set of rules in order to determine. If you could, you would understand the Grand Theory of Everything, not only for 'our' dimension, but for all dimension in which consciousness resides. They occur in our reality at first sight as random and they don't follow the 3D basic set of rules. You have to change ( indeed :-) ) the way you hink about these inter-dimensional concepts. Other parts of your 'ratio' may understand this, if only you want to listen to it


I don’t think you fully understand what “one could expect at random” let alone how “repeated;y and consistently” you can find your “confirmation instantly” of your “synchronistic patterns” that are simply a matter of just your whim within what “one could expect at random”. No Dutch there is nothing “complex” about your rules, you’ve basically got only one, whatever you feel is correct is correct.

Please identify specifically what “3D basic set of rules” you claim your “synchronistic patterns” “don't follow”.

Fact of the matter is Dutch that these “synchronistic patterns” of yours, that “find confirmation instantly” for you and by you, being entirely at your whim follow exactly that “set of rules”, at your whim. If “you can't even determine a set of rules” for your dimensional design hype then you have no basis to assert “that this underlying Design is so complex”. I don’t think you understand at all that your simple (and apparently willing) lack of understanding doesn’t make something “so complex”. It is actually establishing rules and finding them to be complex that actually makes something, well, “so complex”. Not a self-contradictory assertion, at your whim, where you just claim it is “so complex” while simultaneously asserting “that you can't even determine a set of rules” that would lend any veracity to your assertion “that this underlying Design is so complex”. Thank you anyway Dutch for admitting “that you can't even determine a set of rules”, which makes everything you’ve done so far in your HDD nonsense absolutely meaningless just by your own assertion.
 
Because I have seen so much confirmations showing up instantly while working with this stuff. Not only a few times, but continuesly.

Some 10 years ago I had to face it. While working with this stuf I saw so much coincidences showing up that I couldn't ignore it. I had to think about it a while because I was used to think in structured ways and logical cause and effct patterns. I have been an accountant of C&L you know ( the youngest in The Netherlands with a company car when I was 20, a long time ago now :-) )

Back then I understood that I was dealing with something very odd. I went against my perspective, but the more I thought about it and when these coincidences continued to show up I couldn't ignore it anymore. During the decade that followed a huge bunch of information showed up based on these same principles and that's why I share it.

Why shouldn’t you “have seen so much confirmations showing up instantly while working with this stuff”? Remember “you can't even determine a set of rules”. Given that (no rules) you should see whatever you want. As an example you having “been an accountant of C&L you know ( the youngest in The Netherlands with a company car when I was 20, a long time ago now :-)” has nothing to do with any of this. It is only there because you want it to have something to do with this.

“based on these same principles” you say? Ah, so there are at least some “rules” you can determine when you want to and most likely ignore when you don’t, hence the reference to “principles” and not rules. Dutch, with no rules there is no way for you to miss. It makes everything you want a ‘confirmation’ and when that happens it just make your “confirmations” meaningless.
 
Nonexistent statistics means that while working with this HDDesign material, the coincidences spin off from it for more frequently than statistically should be expected. That means, if you do your research properly. I wouldn't be here if I hadn't noticed that in the first place

No Dutch “Nonexistent statistics” means that the “statistics” to support your claim that “the coincidences spin off from it for more frequently than statistically should be expected” are just, well, “Nonexistent”. Please get back to us when you actually have some existent statistics to support your assertion of what happens “more frequently than statistically should be expected”.
 
We aren't at the same level of thought. HDDesign isn't causing anything.

I have never said such a thing

"isn't causing anything", you say? Then not much of a "Design" (hyper-dimensional or otherwise) is it? Thank you though for admitting your "HDDesign" can be safely ignored, as it "isn't causing anything".
 
Plastic Dimensional Design foresees wild horses, ocean birds, and groundhogs on February 2.
 
Timeframe around January 29 coming up ( placed on the timeline as peak Jan 27-31).
Identified underlying theme ( among others) is the March 11, 2011 quake tsunami ( nuclear).

Goro Adachi came up with the same underlying Design independently from HDDesign.

complementary again

'Insight' came through yesterday by openeing of window, 3 days prior to predetemined peak. As many time before. Intuitive thought, application of the Golden Mean and it showed up, that's how it works.

This is not a post in order to convince you or as part of a discussion.

It is posted in order to make a subtle expression possible

Not a post "as part of a discussion" you say? So your post "in order to make a subtle expression possible" is just spam?
 
On a lark I googled "Serbian War Criminals". Dozens of people were profiled, enough to give you court dates galore within any made up time frame, especially given the wide windows Dutch uses. So much for the Srebrenica timeline.

Damn, I wasted my 2000th post in this thread.
 
Not a post "as part of a discussion" you say? So your post "in order to make a subtle expression possible" is just spam?

I have been asked to show how HDDesign works, how it emerges with calculations, graphs etc etc.

This is how it works, nothing more, nothing less:


Well well well......

I am very busy lately. I have days that I have to work 12 hours and when I work less I have to take care of my kids. I had to catch up alot today, because I finally have some time.

When Kog posted the link to Etemenanki I didn't had the time to read it, until just a few moments ago.

Independent from what Goro posted, I was at work yesterday afternoon preparing for the weekend and I had time a little room for the 'DDesign research'.

I decided to check yesterday as marker with the end of the Mayan Calendar based on the Golden Mean and I noticed the Syria 'connection': start of the civil war in Syria and this weeks developments in relation to Syria.

I also noticed the March 11, 2011 quake/tsunami and I posted it yesterday in the Maya thread in relation to around January 27.

Goro did the same. Although he already wrote about it, I didn't knew about it when it showed up instantly when I ' did my thing' so to speak.

For me it means that it is complementary, making the timeframe around January 27 certainly very inetresting to keep an eye on.

Yesterday I decided not to post it on the timeline because I didn't had to time to look for additional confirmation based on HDDesign, so i posted it in the Maya thread.

With Goro's post as additional confirmation I will now post it on the timeline Q1, 2014.
 
Last edited:
Timeframe around January 29 coming up ( placed on the timeline as peak Jan 27-31).
Identified underlying theme ( among others) is the March 11, 2011 quake tsunami ( nuclear).

Goro Adachi came up with the same underlying Design independently from HDDesign.

complementary again

'Insight' came through yesterday by openeing of window, 3 days prior to predetemined peak. As many time before. Intuitive thought, application of the Golden Mean and it showed up, that's how it works.

This is not a post in order to convince you or as part of a discussion.

It is posted in order to make a subtle expression possible

Subtle expression? Hah, I see an extremely clear, very strong expression of irrationality in your post, in the form of meaningless bombastic gobbledygook .

I take your 'subtle expression', throw it in the mud and step on it with boots after I stepped in elephant dung.
 
I have been asked to show how HDDesign works, how it emerges with calculations, graphs etc etc.

This is how it works, nothing more, nothing less:

It works by you spamming the internet?

Dutch you were "asked to show how HDDesign works, how it emerges with calculations, graphs etc etc." as part of the discussion on this, well, discussion forum. As you assert your previous post was not part of a discussion (or more specifically this discussion) and you apparently just intend to post quotes of yourself from elsewhere on the web (most likely your own website) then evidently "how it works" is by you just spamming the interwebs.

With all your years of experience Dutch it should be no problem for you to just walk us through an example or actual instance of its application without resorting to spamming quotes from yourself from somewhere else or mirroring the stream of consciousness cacophony that is your website. Oh wait, that's right “you can't even determine a set of rules” so you just don't know what you have been doing all this time. That's all you really had to say.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom