Hyper Dimensional Design

[Orphia Nay]

I'm mildly curious as to whether Dutch considers Ariel Sharon a "Sun King"...

 

[Daylightstar]

Your one eyed pyramid sticking out it's tongue is much more interesting ... and funny

 

[Paul]

I'm mildly curious as to whether Dutch considers Ariel Sharon a "Sun King"...

Don't give him any ideas

Anyway, that's one prediction for you, any other ideas as to how Dutch will shoehorn. cherry-pick, post-dict and generally make-stuff-up to gloat over his death*?








*something even a Palestinian politician thinks is not on

 

[Dutch]

I'm mildly curious as to whether Dutch considers Ariel Sharon a "Sun King"...

His condition became critical at Venus Transit timeframe, he left us physically expressing the Golden Mean in our perception of time based on the Mercurytransit of November 8, 2006 ( since 2006 linked to his posible passing), as mentioned numerous times in the HDDesign material. I have said repeatedly that Sharon 'holds the key' in the past, so now we will have to face what will be unlocked perhaps.
The trial of the Hariri case started today, a hit on the expectations posted on the timeline Q1 2014 as you all might know. ( only fot those who do follow the timelines, for the others: your remarks are irrelevant)
Together with devastation ( Haïti quake ) and Deep Impact ( as above , so below) as underlying themes. At Phi point we find the flight 522 crash prominent on the timeline in HDDesign, making it nuclear in potential.

 

[Sideroxylon]

That's an odd fixation you have with flight 522.

 

[Dutch]

Since this thread has found new life in the paranormal section, and no new reader in their right mind should read through the whole thread, here is me responding to a gauntlet thrown down by Dutch.
[FONT=&quot]My response on [/FONT]
21st July 2011, 03:40 PM Post #4311

[FONT=&quot]Here is what happenened on September 24,2011:[/FONT]

There's even much more interesting stuff on the timeline for september 24, 2011, besides your finding. I consider it to be a synchronicity because the timeline puts it into perspective. Go give it a look
And on April 13, 2012:
These events were orders of magnitude better predictions than anything Dutch has presented.

 

[Dutch]

for Wolrab.

It was already there on the timeline in 2011, so huray for Dutch

If he would have read it for once....

 

[Dutch]

Your ideas interest me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. You can take me off yours, Dutch.

basically he's reapeating a posted issue if you can understand

 

[Dutch]

"show up much more frequently than statistically could be accepted ( based on a rational and intelligent mind)."? By all means please show where exactly have you applied your "rational and intelligent mind" to what should be statistically expected let alone "accepted"? Heck even just cite anyone (other than yourself) who claims that what you do is in any way statistically improbable.

An "irrational set of rules" you say? While I expect some would argue with the "set of rules" part, the irrationality is readily apparent. "can't ignore it anymore rationally" you further say? Unfortunately, your assertion of some "irrational set of rules" dictates either rationality is ignored in your purported "set of rules" or those "rules" are "rationally", well, ignored.

If these correlations show up repeatedly and consistently, than i am smart enough that it couldn't be just by change. The problem we are facing, is that you can;t accept the fact that this HDDesign 'research' comes to light this way.

I wouldn't share this if I wouldn't be convinced that it would statistically be impossible to occur this way. Of course, you haven't had these experiences while working with this material as I have. But first: you haven't really tried to follow these emerging patterns as logged on the timelines and second: this way you can find yourselves secure to dismiss, ignore and walk away from the opportunities that are given.
You seem to have a problem with comprehending the subjects at hand. if you want a repeatable sequence of events based on a set pare of parameters, because that's the limit your rigid 3-D perspective can comprehend, than we a re finished talking. You step aside the correlations that I have noticed and logged while working with this material.
You are allowed to say that it is just coincidence, I just tell you that how I experience it , it is all but coincidence...And yes, the difference between you and me is that I take HDDesign serious, and you don't.
The confirmation continue to show off though, wether you like it or not. repeatedly and consistently

 

[Dutch]

"would't that be of influence?" If it were then it would be a causal relation "in our familiar 3-D reality". Just as claiming no causal relations "in our familiar 3-D reality" is self-contradictory to asserting some dependence even on just “what we actually make of our 3-D reality”. Similarly asserting people have “other dimensional levels of consciousness” that they are not “aware about” is also self-contradictory. As being “aware about” (not to mention awake) is the definition of consciousness.

Not to worry Dutch I fully expected your non-causally related “theoretical causalities” to be simply self-contradictory.

You're an intelligent person, how culd you rule out that evolutionary development of consciousness is only limited to a biological existence here for let's say 75 years if you are Lucky?Theoretical science accepts Multi-dimensional realities, whatever the represent, they are even necessary to describe the Theory of All, of which we are still waiting ( despite Hawking promissed it 20 years ago to have it in 10 years). next generations will look at you as a Neaderthaler when it comes to understanding the interdimensional connectednes of consciusness. also in relation how we perceive the universe(S)

 

[Dutch]

have to go now, must be at work at 6:30 tomorrow

 

[Mister Earl]

Zero plus zero is still zero, Dutch. All your word salad is useless. Now here's how you can be productive:

1.) Post your entire process, from start to finish, including all math formulas and graphs.
2.) Irrelevant, since you refuse to even attempt point one.

Posted for the 10th year straight.

And yet again, I will make the prediction on your HDD threads which you always end up proving correct: I predict you will not even attempt this and will instead continue on as you have for the past ten years, despite haven gotten nowhere.

 

[Daylightstar]

There's even much more interesting stuff on the timeline for september 24, 2011, besides your finding. I consider it to be a synchronicity because the timeline puts it into perspective. Go give it a look
And on April 13, 2012:
These events were orders of magnitude better predictions than anything Dutch has presented.

What a strange post.

 

[Daylightstar]

Dutch is mixing up things a bit more than usually ....

 

[Reality Check]

There's even much more interesting stuff on the timeline for september 24, 2011, besides your finding.

Wow, Dutch, you know that things happened on September 24, 2011 !
Not that has anything to do with an imaginary or made up "timeline".

 

[Mister Earl]

What a strange post.

It's almost as if he were trying to post from a sock account again. Wonder if that's a cut and paste of something he posted as a sock on another forum... let's google...

Nope, no google hits. Still quite odd.

 

[Reality Check]

If these correlations show up repeatedly and consistently, ...

If you imagine that these "correlations " exist then in your head they will show up repeatedly and consistently, Dutch.
This does not mean that they actually exist outside of your head.

Nonexistent statistics means nothing, Dutch.

The demand that we read thousands of posts to find out yet again that no explanation of HDDesign exists is absurd, Dutch .
From my post with the many issues that you have ignored, Dutch:

Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" here?
First asked 4th November 2013.
Your assertion that such an explanation exists in this thread looks like a lie, Dutch.
...
Dutch: What does "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" mean?
First asked 29th October 2013
That really should be 1881 days since that was the first unexplained mention and you have never explained it as far as I can see.

Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013

Dutch: Please show the working HDDesign calculation that matches these moon impacts
9th December 2013

Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013

 

[Daylightstar]

It's almost as if he were trying to post from a sock account again. Wonder if that's a cut and paste of something he posted as a sock on another forum... let's google...

Nope, no google hits. Still quite odd.

Without looking it up, I think it was part of a post from wolrab.

 

[Daylightstar]

Without looking it up, I think it was part of a post from wolrab.

Yep, last line of this post by Wolrab.

 

[Wolrab]

There's even much more interesting stuff on the timeline for september 24, 2011, besides your finding. I consider it to be a synchronicity because the timeline puts it into perspective. Go give it a look
And on April 13, 2012:
These events were orders of magnitude better predictions than anything Dutch has presented.

Freudian slip?

Dutch, remember when you posted a couple of dates without explanation? Nothing happened on those dates that you could shoehorn in and you mumbled your usual tripe.
I have a timeline with every single date you've gone on about. I call it a calendar.