Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

I'll refer you to this.
Paranormal nonsense.

I don't go to links, so make your point specific

 

[Dutch]

No Dutch, I understand many kinds of relations. Causal relations are rather significant though as those are the relations that make things happen and are perhaps relations we can manipulate to change things or get things done. Once again there is absolutely nothing intelligent in you professing your one dimensional numerology as something hyper-dimensional. Mind you I don't dismiss them at all, I find your propensity to try to ascribe some hyper-dimensional agency to just your own intuitive mussing quite telling and most unfortunate.

I agree with you that you are very capable of understandind causal realations as the appear in our reality based on our currently accepted understanding of reality. Also scientifically, because I do think The Man ( for once ) that you do have a pretty good understanding about our scientific process.
At the same time you are still limited in this rigid 3-D pespective of reality, only to walk behind the scientific findings that will change the way you look at reality. I don't want to be harsh, not at all, but i think you have the talent to explore much more than what you currently accept as possible.

Use your talent. I've good vibes when I'm writing this, honest.

I'm not a bad guy either, not at all would people say who know me.

But it is inevitable

sooner or later also science will push the masses into a complete new understanding of reality. Completely different than what we have used to think.

That IS going to happen

 

[Daylightstar]

...
I'm not a bad guy either, not at all would people say who know me.
...

Well, okay, that's what you say, and it might very well be true. But we could also let your documented (and demonstrated in this thread) online conduct speak for itself.
That might give a more balanced view.

 

[The Man]

I agree with you that you are very capable of understandind causal realations as the appear in our reality based on our currently accepted understanding of reality. Also scientifically, because I do think The Man ( for once ) that you do have a pretty good understanding about our scientific process.
At the same time you are still limited in this rigid 3-D pespective of reality, only to walk behind the scientific findings that will change the way you look at reality. I don't want to be harsh, not at all, but i think you have the talent to explore much more than what you currently accept as possible.

Use your talent. I've good vibes when I'm writing this, honest.

I'm not a bad guy either, not at all would people say who know me.

But it is inevitable

sooner or later also science will push the masses into a complete new understanding of reality. Completely different than what we have used to think.

That IS going to happen

Unfortunately this leaves you and your intuition no better off than they were before. You still don't get it. With no casual relation in our "3-D pespective of reality" as you put it, there ain't a dang thing we can do about it. Which makes your fantasy rather pointless even as far as just fantasies go.

I do use my talents Dutch and quite frankly I couldn't give a flying handshake about your "vibes" good or otherwise

You don't have to be a bad guy Dutch to simply be misguided. The problem is it is just you that is misguiding you, as such only you can correct that.

Oh I have no doubt that you long for a better world but self-indulgent inter-dimensional communication fantasies aren’t going to help you or anyone get there. Additionally insisting others indulge you in this will actually detract from that goal as it takes the focus away from those actual, you know causally related, aspects that could actually improve our, well, “pespective of reality”.

 

[Reality Check]

Mathematics is application of numbers,

Too simple to be correct, Dutch: mathematics.

Arithmetic is the application of numbers.

The problem is that in the last 10 years you have not written any text that shows a coherent shown any application of numbers.

Make a specific post about an issue that you might have and I will respond.

The issue is that you have provided no coherent explanation of anything. Start with a question from my recent post with many issues that you have ignored, Dutch:

Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" here?
First asked 4th November 2013.
Your assertion that such an explanation exists in this thread looks like a lie, Dutch.

You can either link to the post(s) in this thread with that explanation or acknowledge that you were wrong about the posts existing and actually write one!

 

[tsig]

You can only understand causal relations within your limited 3D perspective of reality. That's the main issue here on this forum. As per definition, I will never be able to convince you as long as you are in this state of development. On the other hand you are able to dismiss all correlations that are given and anticipated in the HDDesign material, based on this same limited perspective, despite all these intelligent correlations that spin off from it. Not only as identified with historical events, but even with events in the future as logged on the timelines

If this HDDesign can help me out with tomorrows lottery numbers then I'm your Huckleberry. Shoot me a PM, kay?

 

[Orphia Nay]

The difference is, orphia my dear, that the fundamental constants based on Pi, Phi and orbital mechanics, do show 'confirmations' on the identified patterns and timelines.

So you admit "You can use these numbers to reach any number at all!"

Why don't you critics choose a set of random varibables and try to do the same a I have been doing during the last decade and will continue to do so?

Wolrab already did. Plastic Dimensional Design.

You ignored it, just as you ignore anything that doesn't fit your one-dimensional worldview.

 

[Wolrab]

Not only did I discover Plastic Dimensional Design, I've refined it, used it's predictions to control all the world's stock exchanges, given trillions to charities, cured every malady known to man, financed 7 intergalactic generation ships, and bought a 50 inch LED TV.

That is how you do it Dutch.

 

[Daylightstar]

Not only did I discover Plastic Dimensional Design, I've refined it, used it's predictions to control all the world's stock exchanges, given trillions to charities, cured every malady known to man, financed 7 intergalactic generation ships, and bought a 50 inch LED TV.

That is how you do it Dutch.

Don't be shy, Wolrab. You forgot the most important thing: you were correct

 

[Wolrab]

Yeah, but the results of my predictions were unambiguous and happened exactly on the predicted dates so it was nothing like hyper dimensional design.

 

[Daylightstar]

Exactly.

By the way, I think the "hyper" in hyper dimensional design is misspelled, it should be "hyped dimensional design".
Or the even better representation "Hyped Tripe".

 

[Orphia Nay]

I asked this of Dutch in November 2006:

"I've always wondered why, given that it's Hyperdimensional design, why can't we predict what, when and where to the minute/second and latitude/longitude?"

Dutch replied saying something of the lines that it could be possible, but he hadn't reached that level yet. (Can't quote exactly, because it was in a private forum, and I respect that.)

How's it going, Dutch? Any progress in 7 years?

HDD still looks the same to me.

 

[Dutch]

Unfortunately this leaves you and your intuition no better off than they were before. You still don't get it. With no casual relation in our "3-D pespective of reality" as you put it, there ain't a dang thing we can do about it. Which makes your fantasy rather pointless even as far as just fantasies go.

But if you would consider the posibility that causal realtions could occur at other dimensional levels of consciousness, especially when we aren't consciously aware about it when we are 'awake' in our familiar 3-D reality, and that these theoretical causalities do depend not only on what we actually make of our 3-D reality, but also about our unmaterialised thoughts and especially what we really feel in relation this all....would't that be of influence? assuming that these outher dimensional expression of consciousness do exist? ( in which I don't have a single doubt )

 

[Dutch]

I asked this of Dutch in November 2006:

"I've always wondered why, given that it's Hyperdimensional design, why can't we predict what, when and where to the minute/second and latitude/longitude?"

Dutch replied saying something of the lines that it could be possible, but he hadn't reached that level yet. (Can't quote exactly, because it was in a private forum, and I respect that.)

How's it going, Dutch? Any progress in 7 years?

HDD still looks the same to me.

You are well aware of the fact that i am not a romote viewer. You are well aware ( or should be ) that I identify underlying themes, also for future timeframes ( only to suit you, because I think it is much more interesting to put events into intelligent perspective once they occur. In fact that is my priority, in order to understand reality better and what it really means and where we are heading to). There's no single doubt in my mind that most of the readers at this sceptic forum will dismiss any intelligent correlations that are given after the fact. That;s why I focus here only on things that were logged in the material in advance

 

[Sideroxylon]

These patterns are dynamic, we can only hope to be humble enough to catch a 'view'.

What appears to be a system in our reality, as per definition based on 3D science and perception, could be based on irrational set of rules ( in our rigid perception of reality), but what I have noticed is that there seems to be a recurring intelligence behind it only to be accepted to those who understand that they have to accept this magnificent thought when they realise that the confirmations show up much more frequently than statistically could be accepted ( based on a rational and intelligent mind). This implies that the understanding of this concept needs a personal confirmation. You will have those who will reject based on their rigid and rational understanding and you will have those who are smart enough that they can't ignore it anymore rationally. But it is a personal journey. Don't expect a rational 3D explanation based on accepted science asn so many here are asking over and over again

You have no standard practices that others could replicate to confirm that you are doing anything interesting or useful. You cannot predict anything. You have failed spectacularly when you have tried. These are facts that no amount of pseudo-philosophical babble can hide.

 

[The Man]

But if you would consider the posibility that causal realtions could occur at other dimensional levels of consciousness, especially when we aren't consciously aware about it when we are 'awake' in our familiar 3-D reality, and that these theoretical causalities do depend not only on what we actually make of our 3-D reality, but also about our unmaterialised thoughts and especially what we really feel in relation this all....would't that be of influence? assuming that these outher dimensional expression of consciousness do exist? ( in which I don't have a single doubt )

"would't that be of influence?" If it were then it would be a causal relation "in our familiar 3-D reality". Just as claiming no causal relations "in our familiar 3-D reality" is self-contradictory to asserting some dependence even on just “what we actually make of our 3-D reality”. Similarly asserting people have “other dimensional levels of consciousness” that they are not “aware about” is also self-contradictory. As being “aware about” (not to mention awake) is the definition of consciousness.

Not to worry Dutch I fully expected your non-causally related “theoretical causalities” to be simply self-contradictory.

 

[The Man]

These patterns are dynamic, we can only hope to be humble enough to catch a 'view'.

What appears to be a system in our reality, as per definition based on 3D science and perception, could be based on irrational set of rules ( in our rigid perception of reality), but what I have noticed is that there seems to be a recurring intelligence behind it only to be accepted to those who understand that they have to accept this magnificent thought when they realise that the confirmations show up much more frequently than statistically could be accepted ( based on a rational and intelligent mind). This implies that the understanding of this concept needs a personal confirmation. You will have those who will reject based on their rigid and rational understanding and you will have those who are smart enough that they can't ignore it anymore rationally. But it is a personal journey. Don't expect a rational 3D explanation based on accepted science asn so many here are asking over and over again

"show up much more frequently than statistically could be accepted ( based on a rational and intelligent mind)."? By all means please show where exactly have you applied your "rational and intelligent mind" to what should be statistically expected let alone "accepted"? Heck even just cite anyone (other than yourself) who claims that what you do is in any way statistically improbable.

An "irrational set of rules" you say? While I expect some would argue with the "set of rules" part, the irrationality is readily apparent. "can't ignore it anymore rationally" you further say? Unfortunately, your assertion of some "irrational set of rules" dictates either rationality is ignored in your purported "set of rules" or those "rules" are "rationally", well, ignored.

 

[Wolrab]

Since this thread has found new life in the paranormal section, and no new reader in their right mind should read through the whole thread, here is me responding to a gauntlet thrown down by Dutch.

Originally Posted by Dutch
and still you guys don't dare to try to do the same with random underlying themes for random future dates for an extended period of time ( not based on HDdesign).

So why don't you start with it? you can help each other if you like

[FONT=&quot]My response on [/FONT]
21st July 2011, 03:40 PM Post #4311

I'll do it.
On Thursday, July 21, 2011 the last Space Shuttle mission ended as the Shuttle Atlantis landed.
By using (hold while I decide what constant I need to use......"i" is too obvious, but probably the most applicable....ah-ha! "p", the plastic constant!) p, the plastic constant, I will demonstrate that something will happen, however vaguely related to the Space Shuttle Atlantis landing for the final time (from a space mission).

The first time line is simple. It is just Day 0 + p = significant event.
HERE IS MY MATH for everyone to follow along:
July 21 + 1.3 = July 22.

My first prediction is that something related to Atlantis returning will happen tomorrow. (as this is the plastic constant, I alone can decide how large the window of opportunity is).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_number

Now, going further out requires more advanced math. July 21 is the 202nd day of the year so if that is multiplied by p, we get the next significant dates by adding the result to the date and the result itself is another significant date.

HERE IS MY MATH!!1!11!
202 x 1.324=267.448
On both April 13, 2012 and September 24, 2011.

I will astound you all with my accuracy as soon as I shoehorn events am aware of the events.

[FONT=&quot]Here is what happenened on September 24,2011:[/FONT]

“The decommissioned satellite re-entered Earth's atmosphere on 24 September 2011.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_Atmosphere_Research_Satellite

And on April 13, 2012:

"The missile traveled one to two minutes and broke apart in the air. It broke into 20 separate pieces," Shin Won-shik, a South Korean Defense Ministry official, said at a briefing Friday morning.

These events were orders of magnitude better predictions than anything Dutch has presented.

 

[Orphia Nay]

for Wolrab.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Your ideas interest me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. You can take me off yours, Dutch.