Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because you generalize and then shoehorn in "hits". Even to the point of arbitrarily redefining the value of pi. You yourself admit you cannot and do not make predictions.

That's why its not in paranormal perhaps
 
this remark does not relate to your suggestive arbitrarily redefining the value of pi, which is not the case
 
Fact is "the first one" you admit you “had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible” so there was nothing for you to be, well, timing. "The second the underlying theme" was your timing of the 'exit of Sun King' which you associated to the death of Mandela and got wrong. You still seem to simply want to pretend your "themes" and "timing" are not codependent and based singularly on your intuition, which, if you haven't noticed yet, is often just wrong.

man, you think you can say I must try harder, but first of all you must try to read and understand better. The first thread was about identifying an exact timing, the second one was about identifying the exact underlying theme, based on the same HDDesign principles back in 2005. The London Bombings and the exit of Mandela correspond
 
By your own assertions they didn't "finds its expression on a pre-determined timeframe" until after the fact.
So? we aren't talking about exact predictions on future events, do we?
The expression still fits the pre-determined timeframe
 
man, you think you can say I must try harder, but first of all you must try to read and understand better. The first thread was about identifying an exact timing, the second one was about identifying the exact underlying theme, based on the same HDDesign principles back in 2005. The London Bombings and the exit of Mandela correspond

Can someone buy me whatever it is this person is smoking?
 
Have you now forgotten you “had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible” and “It took an exact Venus Transit timeframe to express”? You don't have to agree with me Dutch but just don't pretend you do agree with yourself. An aspect you should try to indulge and explore in a more critical and quantitative fashion.

These events still find expression on identified timecoded patterns or dates based on identified and described elements of HDDesign.
 
I don't believe in supernatural nonsense but the amount of ***** that has been posted in 2013 has been nothing short of phenomenal.

Is the human race regressing into some caveman culture?
 
The first problem is that you have presented no evidence that you posted this stuff before the events. Not even links to a forum post or blog entry. They probably exist but you have not cited them. Of course the 'july 7 London Bombings' post will state that there will be Bombings in London on july 7, Dutch :eek:.

The next problem is that you have posted no citation to a prediction that there would be a bombing in London on July 7 2005. I suspect that this is your usual something will happen somewhere in the world around this day.

The next problem is the insanely vague term "exit of Sun King". Why not 'departure of the small dwarf'? You are basically predicting that someone will "exit" (not even die!) somewhere in the world around some date. You then attach this vague wish of yours to a personally important person and get it wrong :jaw-dropp!

The next problem is that you do not post-predict this "exit of Sun King" to the actual exit of the actual Sun King :rolleyes:.

If you want to do your reality check, you have to replace yourselves back to June 2005. I have put the relevant posts into a single thread called "July 7 London Bombings 7-4-7 based timecoded pattern" , you can find it here:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=14&mforum=hddesign
you can login as 'reader'with password 'reader'
There you can review how a timecoded pattern emerges out of nowhere resulting on a focus on July 7, 2005. Remember that the timing is important, not the underlying theme.
This very same pattern has been applied by identifying the underlying theme 'exit of Sun king', also live logged in the material back in 2005. That thread is called "exit of Sun King 7-4-7 based:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=7&mforum=hddesign

Both threads are based on the triggerdate system but since you give notice not to read the HDdesign material you would probably don't know what I talk about here. I think you do understand that if you don't actually read the material and try to understand it, that i can't explain years of knowledge in a single post to you. ( What I Always will do if I'm convinced that you really want to try and do the efforts. Most of you don't, so they are meaningless in the discussion)
 
So your " instant out of the bleu perception" is wrong just as often as it is right simply by your own accounting and "cannot" be otherwise by your own above assertion. That's no better than chance.

I dare to differ, because when you follow the findings you will change your perception on this. I only started to share this stuff at the moment I knew for sure something is going on that can't be explained with just by chance. And yes I am smart enough to understand chance and I am powerful enough to challenge you, based on the findings in the HDDesign material
 
Now, we are pattern seeking creatures, it's part of our evolutionary survival skills. The downside being that we tend to ascribe patterns (or more specifically agency) where there may be none. On the plus side, finding patterns, modeling them and utilizing said models is what has given us our modern technological society. Lots of things have recurring or semi-recurring patterns. So just perhaps intuitively recognizing some potential patterns ain't such a bad thing even if you get it wrong some times. Ascribing those intuitively discerned (subjective) patterns some agency (other than your own) and particularly some hyper-dimensional agency (especially when you use only one dimension for said patterns) will not work out well. As that pattern tends to be obvious to the more objective pattern seeking individuals of our species.

man, we aren't at the same level of thought. You have to think about these issues beyond your limited 3D perception of reality. You are stuck within limitations that only you can brake down. I want to help you with this, but you have to do it yourselves. This can't be told or just explained, it can only be understood by the individual. Try to think beyond the boundaries of our experience of the limited 3D perception of reality. Years from now it will be becom common to think in interdimensional terms, in the way we look at our universe, in the way we look at matter, in the way we look at consciousness itself.
That's your future while you're here, use it. You would help yourselves and everybody else for that matter
 
That's why its not in paranormal perhaps

Not in Paranormal?

Scroll up.

JREF Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The ParanormalHyper Dimensional Design

ETA: Is this thread loading really slowly for anyone else? Is it time for a continuation thread?
 
Last edited:
The ball is in your court Dutch and you've now given yourself a very tough row to hoe. By your own attempt at excuses you have asserted your intuition is no better than chance (as would be expected). It is up to you now to improve and quantify your accounting to demonstrate otherwise. Heck, you may have some intuitive insight into some patterns but just making excuses that just give you nothing better than chance wont help you demonstrate that to anyone but yourself.


Not tough at all, if you are honest, you should admit that there's Always a sense of connectedness with what I've said and more inportant for you in order to convince you: in what I will say in the future. I for one, am pretty laid back because I just have to sit and wait until the synchronicities occur or the intuitive insights. Read my lipps: the HDDesign material and the timeliness especially, will continue to show of their validity time after time. And time after time you will dismiss it, until you open your eyes. I hope so for you, but for everybody else for that matter That's where your responsibility lies, if you don't want to waste this life while the opportunity has been given
 
Dutch, where do you get your numbers for the orbital periods of the planets/objects?

Just a link will suffice. Preferably a link to a list of the planets/objects with the periods tabled.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=9686731#post9686731
Repost since Dutch dodged this:

Dutch, where do you get your numbers for the orbital periods of the planets/objects?

Just a link will suffice. Preferably a link to a list of the planets/objects with the periods tabled.
 
Not tough at all, if you are honest, you should admit that there's Always a sense of connectedness with what I've said and more inportant for you in order to convince you: in what I will say in the future. I for one, am pretty laid back because I just have to sit and wait until the synchronicities occur or the intuitive insights. Read my lipps: the HDDesign material and the timeliness especially, will continue to show of their validity time after time. And time after time you will dismiss it, until you open your eyes. I hope so for you, but for everybody else for that matter That's where your responsibility lies, if you don't want to waste this life while the opportunity has been given

Hilarious
 
Dutch, where do you get your numbers for the orbital periods of the planets/objects?

Just a link will suffice. Preferably a link to a list of the planets/objects with the periods tabled.

it depends, for our planets it is commonly known. For Phobos I would like to have acces to the realtime scientific numbers as we are currently approaching the 1/Pi countdown in our perception of time. In this case it is about seconds. latest I can find is abot 50 seconds away, but ofcourse i am curius about how long it will take that phobos will reach that orbital period. Last interesting info on this that is available on the internet, is that ESA found Phobos on a different position as expected, which means her orbital period is closing losing more orbital period that expected by scientists.
 
... I for one, am pretty laid back because I just have to sit and wait ...

The way you appear to act on a compulsion to cram your belief into other people's minds years on end, not exactly the signature of a laid back person ....

Just look at your periodic volleys of posts containing repetition of empty irrationality, not exactly the signature of a laid back person ....
 
it depends, for our planets it is commonly known. For Phobos I would like to have acces to the realtime scientific numbers as we are currently approaching the 1/Pi countdown in our perception of time. In this case it is about seconds. latest I can find is abot 50 seconds away, but ofcourse i am curius about how long it will take that phobos will reach that orbital period. Last interesting info on this that is available on the internet, is that ESA found Phobos on a different position as expected, which means her orbital period is closing losing more orbital period that expected by scientists.

So, again, no actual answer to the actual question. Isn't there a word for that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom