Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

I realize English is not you first language. The above should read: "But that's okay, I'm used to laying eggs here."

Your welcome.

I'm well aware of the fact that you don't understand the issues at hand.

Your remark apparently skipped the filter, please mention 9/11 or Orphias occupation for once, so i'm not the only one to see his posts deleted because it would be an insult

 

[Dutch]

First I want to remind you, Dutch, about the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics because you are obviously ignorant about what it is !


So what we are left with is nonsense, gibberish, lies about explaining HDDesign and Dutch's dreams about cherry-picked events.

Dutch's failed HDD fantasies and other fantasies!

Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" here?
First asked 4th November 2013 - 16 days and counting.
Your assertion that such an explanation exists in this thread is quickly looking like a lie, Dutch.

Was "HDDesign is not about predictions" a lie or a mistake, Dutch?
First asked 4th November 2013 - 16 days and counting.

Dutch: Show how you worked out a "grand cross" on December 26 2004
First asked 4th November 2013 - 16 days and counting.

Dutch: What does "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" mean?
First asked 29th October 2013 - 22 days and counting.
That really should be 1881 days since that was the first unexplained mention and you have never explained it as far as I can see.

And we now we have another bit of HDDesign gibberish "7-4-7-based" that needs explanation:
Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is.
Show the mathematics. Give a fully worked out example, e.g. the actual prediction of a July 7 event with the details such as
it would be in London,
it would be in the Underground and buses,
t would be a bombing,
it would be suicide bombers,
number of people killed,
number of people injured,
etc.
Show why it was not that the G8 leaders pledged to double 2004 levels of aid to Africa from US$25 to US$50 billion by the year 2010.
Show why it was not any other event that happened on 7 July 2005 and thus you are not cherry picking that event because it was in the news.
First asked 9 December 2013 - 0 days and counting.
Otherwise this is the same as your Sun King fantasy - a bit a astrological nonsense.

July 7 was predetermined as a timing, not as underlying theme. Not as past of an ongoing pattern or in relation of other related events. It emerged in June 2005 and pimpointed at July 7. Walk through that thread and focus on your remark

 

[Reality Check]

What I mean is, ...snipped gibberish....

Dutch
What you wrote exposed your ignorance of the uncertainly principle in quantum mechanics. It is nothing to do with your fantasies. It is a scientific principle.
The uncertainly principle is not numerology combined with astrology combined with fantasy:
Dutch's failed HDD fantasies and other fantasies!

Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" here?
First asked 4th November 2013.
Your assertion that such an explanation exists in this thread is quickly looking like a lie, Dutch.

Was "HDDesign is not about predictions" a lie or a mistake, Dutch?
First asked 4th November 2013.

Dutch: Show how you worked out a "grand cross" on December 26 2004
First asked 4th November 2013.

Dutch: What does "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" mean?
First asked 29th October 2013
That really should be 1881 days since that was the first unexplained mention and you have never explained it as far as I can see.

Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013

Dutch: Please show the working HDDesign calculation that matches these moon impacts
9th December 2013

 

[Dutch]

your other remarks have been explained or referred to here in this thread previously, so do your homework

 

[Reality Check]

Dutch: Show your (before 7 July 2005) mathematics showing 7 July 2005 is a "timing".

July 7 was predetermined as a timing, not as underlying theme. ...

Oh dear another fantasy demanding another question, Dutch
Dutch: Show your mathematics from before 7 July 2005 (i.e. predetermined) that showed that 7 July 2005 is a "timing".
11 December 2013

And you did not actually answer the question:
Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013

 

[Reality Check]

your other remarks have been explained or referred to here in this thread previously, so do your homework

Give links to those answers, Dutch, otherwise I have to conclude they you are lying .

I did my homework and so far it looks like you have lied about there being an explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" in this thread:

But let us see where you have explained "Tetrahedron at macrolevel" in your posts containing these words:
10th September 2008: Lots of fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
12th September 2008: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
19th September 2008: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
20th September 2008: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
27th September 2008: A deluge of delusions !
5th October 2008: A bigger deluge of delusions !
10th October 2008: Yet more delusions.
12th October 2008: Now you are trusting deluded people ("Hoagland and others).
25th October 2008: A paranoid conspiracy theory and the delusion that it is related to HDDesign.
30th October 2008: Repeating the paranoid conspiracy theory and more word salad.
31st January 2009: So much woo in that enormous post, Dutch .
20th February 2009: What looks like a lie abut the use of platonic solids on HDDesign being explained in this forum.
23rd February 2009: More HDDesign delusions without explanation.
8th March 2009: More HDDesign delusions without explanation. This time throwing in the mythical "end of the Mayan calendar" !
14th March 2009: No explanation, Dutch.
13th April 2009: No explanation, Dutch.
30th April 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
9th July 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
9th July 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
7th August 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
29th August 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch. This includes the "exit of the Sun King" gibberish.
20th September 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch. This includes the Mayan calendar insanity.
12th December 2009: "Waves of change" fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
18th June 2010: No explanation, Dutch.
18th June 2010: No explanation, Dutch.
1st January 2011: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
27th June 2011: A fanatsy about the Madrid bombing- no explanation, Dutch.
2nd August 2011: Tons of fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
14th March 2012: More HDDesign fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
26th October 2013: No explanation, Dutch.

 

[Dutch]

And aside from those caveats it's spot-on in its predictive power.

There's not a single doubt, that what has been logged in the HDdesign material will find its confirmation. Especially what has been logged on the timelines during the last couple of years. Application of simple and basic Pi and Phi based correlations as described in HDDesign will do the job.For me its just a learning adventure as it is for you. The only difference is that I need less of a confirmation about the meaning of this all. I prefer you people think about that yourselves, as i am convinced that it is the key to progress.

 

[The Man]

What I mean is, that back in 2005 these identified timecoded patterns emerged out of nowhere, without the current knowledge about these patterns that is currently available, at least to me. Back than, it was some kind of 'deciphering' of synchronistic and intuitive correlations. Back than I had to spend alot of time in trying to understand.
If there is an instant understanding of reality, because of the in debt observation of the patterns and underlying themes, then it's just like at quantum level. You cannot have an instant out of the bleu perception of what is about to be expressed, both in sense of exact timing and the exact expression of the expected underlying theme that is about to be expressed.
I think that this is possible by enhanched investigation of the ongoing patterns and themes, based on the finetuned elements of HDDesign that emerged later on in this 'research'.

Nope, still not “just like at quantum level” and the fact that you are better at retro fitting things into your “exact timing and the exact expression of the expected underlying theme” after the fact has absolutely nothing to do with anything “at quantum level”. These “synchronistic and intuitive correlations” of yours are just that, yours. So if you do want what is “possible by enhanched investigation of the ongoing patterns and themes” you are going to have to learn to accept, admit and document when they are just wrong. You seem to be trying to separate your “exact timing” from your “exact expression of the expected underlying theme” however given that your timings and “timelines” are based on your “themes” one is explicitly based on the other and both still just on your intuition.

 

[The Man]

Its not an excuse, fact is that the 'exit of Sun King' thread is linked to december 5. it has been there for review since 2005 so..
What I mean with "uncertainty principle" at macro level is that you can aparently have a sence about the timing or the expceted underlying theme. That is when they emerge 'out of the blue', as which was the case in the timecoded pattern related to the London bombings. July 7 was predetermined, but i had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible. With the 'exit of Sun King' it was the other way round, the underlying theme became clear, but not the exact timing. It took an exact Venus Transit timeframe to express

Indeed it is an excuse as you admit you “had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible” on July 7. So you just selected that date for whatever reason but certainly not because you had any “idea what could have happened”. Similarly it is a vain attempt at an excuse for you associating Mandela with your vague ‘exit of Sun King' recently and then being wrong about when what you now consider an ‘exit of Sun King', his death, would occur. That you now want to use “It took an exact Venus Transit timeframe to express” as an additional excuse after the fact doesn’t make you any less wrong in both “the timing” and “the expceted underlying theme” areas and on both counts, “July 7” and “'exit of Sun King”.

 

[The Man]

There's not a single doubt, that what has been logged in the HDdesign material will find its confirmation. Especially what has been logged on the timelines during the last couple of years. Application of simple and basic Pi and Phi based correlations as described in HDDesign will do the job.For me its just a learning adventure as it is for you. The only difference is that I need less of a confirmation about the meaning of this all. I prefer you people think about that yourselves, as i am convinced that it is the key to progress.

"There's not a single doubt"? See you have no uncertainty so you can't use that as an excuse when you think it suits you. Indeed you will find whatever confirmation you want no matter how long or how many "exact Venus Transit timeframe"s it takes, but again always after the fact.

 

[jaydeehess]

Wow!
I read page one and last page only to discover that this thread has not progressed at all in the interim. Dutch cannot explain wtf he is talking about, cannot demonstrate user independent results from whatever his HDD is.
People say I'm a bit nuts to keep engaging 9/11 nuttery, but after my perusal of this thread I feel just fine.

 

[Dutch]

Wow!
I read page one and last page only to discover that this thread has not progressed at all in the interim. Dutch cannot explain wtf he is talking about, cannot demonstrate user independent results from whatever his HDD is.
People say I'm a bit nuts to keep engaging 9/11 nuttery, but after my perusal of this thread I feel just fine.

People are right

 

[Daylightstar]

your other remarks have been explained or referred to here in this thread previously, so do your homework

Another installment of:

...
The 'it's over there" trick, where no such 'it' exists.
As documented earlier, I'll show you the posts, Dutch:
...

 

[Dutch]

Nope, still not “just like at quantum level” and the fact that you are better at retro fitting things into your “exact timing and the exact expression of the expected underlying theme” after the fact has absolutely nothing to do with anything “at quantum level”. These “synchronistic and intuitive correlations” of yours are just that, yours. So if you do want what is “possible by enhanched investigation of the ongoing patterns and themes” you are going to have to learn to accept, admit and document when they are just wrong. You seem to be trying to separate your “exact timing” from your “exact expression of the expected underlying theme” however given that your timings and “timelines” are based on your “themes” one is explicitly based on the other and both still just on your intuition.

man, I was making a comparison to the 'uncertainty principle ' at quantum level. do you disagree such an uncertainly exists? Have you ever thought about what this could mean at macro level?
You seem to have to expand the habbit of ignoring each 'confirmation' that finds its expression eventually based on the HDdesign material. everytime again.

 

[Daylightstar]

There's not a single doubt, ...

... in your mind.

... I need less of a confirmation about the meaning of this all. ...

That is sooo true .....

 

[Dutch]

Indeed it is an excuse as you admit you “had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible” on July 7. So you just selected that date for whatever reason but certainly not because you had any “idea what could have happened”. Similarly it is a vain attempt at an excuse for you associating Mandela with your vague ‘exit of Sun King' recently and then being wrong about when what you now consider an ‘exit of Sun King', his death, would occur. That you now want to use “It took an exact Venus Transit timeframe to express” as an additional excuse after the fact doesn’t make you any less wrong in both “the timing” and “the expceted underlying theme” areas and on both counts, “July 7” and “'exit of Sun King”.

fact is that in these 2 threads, in the first one the timing was correct and in the second one the underlying theme. Its there to review, period.

 

[Daylightstar]

Wow!
I read page one and last page only to discover that this thread has not progressed at all in the interim. Dutch cannot explain wtf he is talking about, cannot demonstrate user independent results from whatever his HDD is.
People say I'm a bit nuts to keep engaging 9/11 nuttery, but after my perusal of this thread I feel just fine.

But, you see, the OP needs less confirmation of his belief.

Much, much less in fact.

 

[Dutch]

"There's not a single doubt"? See you have no uncertainty so you can't use that as an excuse when you think it suits you. Indeed you will find whatever confirmation you want no matter how long or how many "exact Venus Transit timeframe"s it takes, but again always after the fact.

When an anticipated event finds its expression on a pre-determined timeframe, how can it be after the fact?

I would agree with you if I had posted the 'july 7 London Bombings' and 'exit of Sun King' stuff after the london bombings and the passing of Mandelea

 

[Daylightstar]

... each 'confirmation' that finds its expression ... everytime again.

Meaning: you give expression to the unsubstantiated 'confirmation' that you believe you experience.

Time and time again ....

 

[Daylightstar]

... Its there to review, period.

All the gory irrationality in all it's 'glory'.