Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
erwinl said:
Being on a holiday and having flown in a Jumbo Jet when the next thought about this HDD came?

Having read quit a large part of this thread it is as good an explanation as any in my opinion.
Click to expand...
I can amagine. first read those threads I've given above and make sure you are familiar with HDDesign in general. When I see you do a serious job I'm willing to help you.
 
Dutch said:
it depends, for our planets it is commonly known. For Phobos I would like to have acces to the realtime scientific numbers as we are currently approaching the 1/Pi countdown in our perception of time. In this case it is about seconds. latest I can find is abot 50 seconds away, but ofcourse i am curius about how long it will take that phobos will reach that orbital period. Last interesting info on this that is available on the internet, is that ESA found Phobos on a different position as expected, which means her orbital period is closing losing more orbital period that expected by scientists.
Click to expand...

Daylightstar said:
So, again, no actual answer to the actual question. Isn't there a word for that?
Click to expand...

Daylightstar, so you noticed the lack of requested information too?

Dutch. A list please. Even if it's a link to a post on your forum.
 
Blue Mountain said:
Curious. I made just such a request a couple of years ago and it was ignored. I believed I even quoted Dutch's remark that it wasn't science.
Click to expand...

currently accepted science. If you want to quote what I mean, you have to do it properly. As far as I know it can't be scientifically rejected, while the indications to the contrarairy are overwhelming, consitantly and will continue to show off confirmation in the future
 
Dutch said:
I'm well aware of the fact that you don't understand the issues at hand.

Your remark apparently skipped the filter, please mention 9/11 or Orphias occupation for once, so i'm not the only one to see his posts deleted because it would be an insult
Click to expand...

There is no filter nor administrator that simply deletes posts in an anonymous fashion.

You will always receive a private message explaining why all or part of a post was deleted. Occasionally the post itself will remain as a place marker and the content will be replaced by a cited forum rule.

If your posts are disappearing in the manner you describe, it could be a JREF board hiccup and the posts are being accidentally deleted. (I have had that happen on occasion )

..........

Given that
(A) no one has accepted in part or in whole anything related to your theory
(B) you believe that some or all of us are bound by our limited way of thinking
(C) that people are still asking for explanations of things mentioned at the beginning of the thread

...why are you still posting here?
Surely, there could not be a better example of pearls before swine.

What is the goal of this thread?

.............
ETA:
2007 ?!?
WTF?
 
Last edited:
Daylightstar said:
The way you appear to act on a compulsion to cram your belief into other people's minds years on end, not exactly the signature of a laid back person ....

Just look at your periodic volleys of posts containing repetition of empty irrationality, not exactly the signature of a laid back person ....
Click to expand...

If you read the HDDesign material, you will notice that the "hard work" has already been done years ago. That's how I came to my current understanding, allowing me to give notice to the occurring synchronicities and intuitive thoughts only, at the moment when they occur. I only have to show you, but that is indeed a hard task
 
Orphia Nay said:
Daylightstar, so you noticed the lack of requested information too?

Dutch. A list please. Even if it's a link to a post on your forum.
Click to expand...

Orbital periods i get from several sources, Wilki is sufficient in relation to the planets. For asteroids or cometsI depend on NASA and ESA. Do you have a problem with the orbital periods used? I don't think so
 
Daylightstar said:
Because you haven't shown anything falsifiable.

In effect, you haven't even actually shown anything.
Click to expand...

I have said from the beginning on that HDDesign isn't and cannot be scientifically proven at this time. that doesn't say anything about its validity.
 
Dutch said:
If you read the HDDesign material, you will notice that the "hard work" has already been done years ago. That's how I came to my current understanding, allowing me to give notice to the occurring synchronicities and intuitive thoughts only, at the moment when they occur. I only have to show you, but that is indeed a hard task
Click to expand...

You're effectively describing compulsive behavior, not laid back behavior.
 
Dutch said:
Orbital periods i get from several sources, Wilki is sufficient in relation to the planets. For asteroids or cometsI depend on NASA and ESA. Do you have a problem with the orbital periods used? I don't think so
Click to expand...

I have a problem with your lack of information.

A list, please, with sources.

How can I have a problem with your periods when I don't know what they are or where you got them?
 
Dutch said:
Orbital periods i get from several sources, Wilki is sufficient in relation to the planets. For asteroids or cometsI depend on NASA and ESA. Do you have a problem with the orbital periods used? I don't think so
Click to expand...

You choose without understanding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom