Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have said from the beginning on that HDDesign isn't and cannot be scientifically proven at this time. that doesn't say anything about its validity.

It doesn't matter that you say that. Key feature of your idea is that you can not even demonstrate it's plausibility.
 
I have a problem with your lack of information.

A list, please, with sources.

How can I have a problem with your periods when I don't know what they are or where you got them?

I have just answered, make a specific point in order to give me the opportunity the proper respond you are aparently expecting? i'm not sure where you are after. Do you suspect me to use wrong orbital periods? please show me and I will give you an answer, you do understand you are asking a question to me that you have to finetune in the first place?
 
You need Earth? it is common knowledge!!!!! focus on the issues and contribute instead of trying to obstruct in a childish way


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth

Do you object obout the 9 th number behind the comma and could you please explain what it implies? Don't make silly remarks, same to you Orphia

An excellent opportunity for you to show how a value with a precision to the second would support your idea.

Go right ahead.
 
I have just answered, make a specific point in order to give me the opportunity the proper respond you are aparently expecting? i'm not sure where you are after. Do you suspect me to use wrong orbital periods? please show me and I will give you an answer, you do understand you are asking a question to me that you have to finetune in the first place?

I don't suspect you use the wrong orbital periods.

I just want more info on HDD.

You seem unwilling or unable to provide it.
 
Enough for now in respond to irrelevant remarks.

I want to share some serious findings or thoughts based on this HDDesign research.

Although I'm not in the position to verify, I still think that there's a valid possibility that Nelson Mandela already left the building on June 26 this year at Grand Cross orbittal position .

In HDDesign it means that his expresion of consciousness left this 3D expression .

The announcement of his final exit on december 5 corresponds with the start of the identified 'exit of sun king' timecoded pattern.

The moment of Nelson's final passing has been chosen

Because this pattern implies human manipulation, nor in other words manmade expression on the pattern. But it had to be on december 5, HDDesign especially unveils our dark side of consciousness

Nelson has been put on lifesupport since that day, or maybe put on ice, I don't know. At least he should be considered to be dead in our dimensions, at least to my understanding. HDDesign is stronger than any lie

Do you really think we are able to collect all these world leaders in South Africa within a few days, if they weren't aware that it would happen?

wake up!

Next year there's a nuclear conference with all world leaders that are attending in South Africa. It takes months to prepare and to secure.

Don't buy it, be wise
 
I don't suspect you use the wrong orbital periods.

I just want more info on HDD.

You seem unwilling or unable to provide it.

Oke which one do you expect? Be specific if you want a specific answer.

If you say that I use a wrong orbital period than you have to ask me specifically and I will respond with full detail.

Ask a specific question Orphia, this way you try to give the impression that my data is incorrect. I strongly object to that, so be specific why you think that I use inaccurate data. You have to come out with this
 
I didn't think I could put it more simply.

I just want a list of the orbital periods / planet years measured in Earth days.
 
Of what? Have you ever taken a look at the HDDesign material? It is based hundreds of times on orbital periods. If you think that you have reason to doubt the data that i use, than ask me specifically or be silent.

We talk about your credibility now
 
I see that this thread has been removed to paranormal?

Did it just happen or earlier? I don't know. I love it to be on a dot.com:)
 
I didn't think I could put it more simply.

I just want a list of the orbital periods / planet years measured in Earth days.

Of what? Have you ever taken a look at the HDDesign material? It is based hundreds of times on orbital periods. If you think that you have reason to doubt the data that i use, than ask me specifically or be silent.

We talk about your credibility now

It's a very simple request, Dutch. Stop trying to read anything into it.

I just want a list of the orbital periods / planet years measured in Earth days.

I.E:

Mercury - # Earth days
Venus - # Earth days
Mars - # Earth days
Earth - 365.25 Earth days

etc.
 
Of what? Have you ever taken a look at the HDDesign material? It is based hundreds of times on orbital periods. If you think that you have reason to doubt the data that i use, than ask me specifically or be silent.

We talk about your credibility now


Your idea is not based on any data, it's based on your unsubstantiated silly 'intuitions' from which you create your 'non-exact' predictions through childish numerological abuse of astronomical data which you randomly pick up.

As you yourself have confirmed and stated, your 'thing' is a psychic exercise. It's a paranormal quest.
As all paranormal quests go, yours is equally lacking in substance.
 
Last edited:
man, you think you can say I must try harder, but first of all you must try to read and understand better. The first thread was about identifying an exact timing, the second one was about identifying the exact underlying theme, based on the same HDDesign principles back in 2005. The London Bombings and the exit of Mandela correspond

Again, please try harder Dutch.
 
So? we aren't talking about exact predictions on future events, do we?
The expression still fits the pre-determined timeframe

Dutch, what we are now talking about are predictions, that, by your own accounting and assertions, you get wrong just as often as you get right. That you simply like to claim "The expression still fits the pre-determined timeframe" after the fact doesn't change the fact that by your own accounting and assertions you do no better than chance.

Perhaps with some better accounting, tabulation and referencing you might be able to demonstrate otherwise but I suspect you know that you are only guessing.
 
These events still find expression on identified timecoded patterns or dates based on identified and described elements of HDDesign.

The 'events' find no such thing, by your own assertions you invent your "expression on identified timecoded patterns or dates based on" your intuition. The accrual events and even non-events (as we have seen on this thread) are subsumed to your desired "expression". You find them, and even when your are wrong you will eventually still find them to be right.
 
So your " instant out of the bleu perception" is wrong just as often as it is right simply by your own accounting and "cannot" be otherwise by your own above assertion. That's no better than chance.

I dare to differ, because when you follow the findings you will change your perception on this. I only started to share this stuff at the moment I knew for sure something is going on that can't be explained with just by chance. And yes I am smart enough to understand chance and I am powerful enough to challenge you, based on the findings in the HDDesign material

Dare to differ all you want, it is when you dare to take a more accurate accounting and better referencing of your Dimensional Design Hype material that you might actually have something to perceive. Evidently you don’t understand chance and are not powerful enough to just challenge yourself as your recent assertion indicate you do know that you can no better than chance.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_orbit
A complete orbit of the earth around the Sun occurs every; 365.2563666 mean solar days

You claim your calculations of Phobos are down to the second, yet you always round your values to what suits you. What is it accuracy or convenience?

You should be happy now that this fantasy of yours is in General Skeptiism and the Paranormal, you have a whole new audience to dazzle. Get to it!
 
man, we aren't at the same level of thought. You have to think about these issues beyond your limited 3D perception of reality. You are stuck within limitations that only you can brake down. I want to help you with this, but you have to do it yourselves. This can't be told or just explained, it can only be understood by the individual. Try to think beyond the boundaries of our experience of the limited 3D perception of reality. Years from now it will be becom common to think in interdimensional terms, in the way we look at our universe, in the way we look at matter, in the way we look at consciousness itself.
That's your future while you're here, use it. You would help yourselves and everybody else for that matter

Again, please try harder Dutch and as you still seem to be having difficulty I will reiterate. I have already given everyone on this thread permission to use my fist name, Dan. I will not read any post that attempts to address me by anything other than my user name "The Man", my first name "Dan" or the combination "Dan The Man" but will simply continue to ask you to "Please, try harder".
 
Not tough at all, if you are honest, you should admit that there's Always a sense of connectedness with what I've said and more inportant for you in order to convince you: in what I will say in the future. I for one, am pretty laid back because I just have to sit and wait until the synchronicities occur or the intuitive insights. Read my lipps: the HDDesign material and the timeliness especially, will continue to show of their validity time after time. And time after time you will dismiss it, until you open your eyes. I hope so for you, but for everybody else for that matter That's where your responsibility lies, if you don't want to waste this life while the opportunity has been given

Dutch your recent posting demonstrate that even you have a "sense" of incorrectness that in the end you give little or no credence and evidently have no desire to explore further. As expected, given the extreme hubris indicated in your above assertion that someone who doesn't "admit that there's Always a sense of connectedness with what I've said" is somehow not being "honest". Again, Dutch, it is just you being dishonest with yourself but it is your responsibility and your wasted life, so have at it all you want. Whenever, if ever, you do decide you want to change that there are plenty of people on this forum who are ready, willing and able to help you, but you first have to want to help yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom