If you don't understand what this Pi based is, than you don';t understand how it is explained with the Deep Impact - Moon transit in relation to the scheduled comet encounters, Orbit Stein in relation to Earth and orbit Phobos in relation to Earth, among more examples in this thread.
I don't think you have even read those explanations, did you?
A good explanation should answer both "why" and "how" questions. For example. relativity and particle physics answer some fundamental questions about the nature of the universe and of matter ("why"), and both are backed up with strong mathematics ("how").
I did a quick review of the Pi-based design materials you posted here, and much of it is along these lines:
Dutch said:
At this point I thought to give Asteroid Steins a closer look and because it was Pi day that made me check the triggerdates, i decided to apply the Pi-correlation as first unveiled with the spacecraft 'Deep Impact' related
events in space as explained in the 'communication' post. Steins orbit is 1326,736 Earth days
1326,7 / Pi / Pi = 134.4 Earth days
1327,7 - 134,4 = 1192,3 Earth days
The 2 Pi points are
1192,3 / 2 = 596,2 Days
and
596,1 +134, 4 = 730,5 Earth days
In the above, you demonstrated a "how": you took the period of the orbit of Steins asteroid and divided by Pi twice. But you utterly failed to explain
why it was necessary to divide by Pi twice, as opposed to dividing by
e or by Phi, and why twice rather than once or three times.
And you do it consistently. Sometimes you work with Pi, Sometimes Phi. Sometimes Earth days. Sometimes Venus years. Sometimes you add; other times you multiply or divide. Other times, who know what? But aside from your get-out-of-jail-free card of "intuitive thoughts," there is never any explanation given as to
why you chose the constants and operations you used.
How can I help you if you refuse to do your own research?
The term you want to use is "study," not "research." It is you who is supposedly researching HDD, in a very disorganized and haphazard approach. "Study" implies that another person can go through the materials to glean an understanding of what you're doing. Unfortunately we can't, because every time we ask "Why was it done this way?" you dismiss the question and say, "Do it yourself!"
