Hyper Dimensional Design

[Paul]

we are not at the same level of thought here apparently.

Really, you've noticed?

try to be Michio Kaku's carp that jumps out of the pool.

Attempting to co-opt real science by invoking work that you obviously don't understand is not going to impress anyone.

There has never been any 3D shape is the deometrical correlations that have been given when it comes to hyper dimensional platonic solids

I know, it's you that keeps using terms that apply to three dimensions without knowing why they're wrong.

 

[Daylightstar]

I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.

Delusion of grandeur.

I agree with you that my conclusions would have been acknowledged here, but if that doesn't happen, does it mean than that the conclusions are invalid or are you just incapable of dealing with it?

You are incapable of showing a realistic basis for your conclusions. Not only are you incapable of doing so, you seem to refuse.

It is therefore reasonable to conclude that your conclusions are invalid.

 

[Daylightstar]

the specific underlying design has been discussed here several times here Wolrab. Do I really have to find the posts for you or do you think you can manage yourself?

You'll present posts with pictures in them....again.
Pictures are not math, Dutch.

 

[Daylightstar]

So in your head the impact on Jupiter didn't happen?

It's irrelevant.

Read what I wrote.

 

[Daylightstar]

in your post you mean?

You would not be able to argue this. You know the answer to your own question.

 

[Daylightstar]

Dutch creates his own reality, and calls that "our reality".

 

[Chris L]

Dutch, if you read about HD physics back in 2003, my guess is it had to do with Hoagland, as he was the only person who was actually "studying" and writing about such things back then. Lots of other people have taken up his meme (with their own spin of course), but the original "idea" (complete with tetrahedron goodness) was basically his. Which is another way of saying it's basically nonsense.

Hoagie dresses up his stuff in pseudo-scientific babble, you don't even try that. Since you have failed to even try to tell us mere mortals what you are really doing, my guess is you don't know either. You are either really delusional and believe this stuff, or you are really just putting us on. If it's the former, I feel sorry for you. If it's the later, ok you got me, feel better now? In either case, have a nice life.

 

[Hans]

Mr Dutch has said with all seriousness

I don't have a single doubt that what i am doing is to the benefit of the whole planet and the destiny of mankind.

Delusion of grandeur.

You are incapable of showing a realistic basis for your conclusions. Not only are you incapable of doing so, you seem to refuse.

It is therefore reasonable to conclude that your conclusions are invalid.

A big ditto with a cherry on top to what Daylightstar has said

As to the difference between the Dutch of 2010 versus the Dutch of 2006 is that you seemed to actually believe what you were trying to 'sell'....but now having not 'sold' it to anyone - you are just going through the motions.

You seem to blame everyone for their failure to understand while discounting the posibility that you are just wrong

I think your own self-delusions are being drowned in second thoughts and the bitter disappointment that your ideas in fact have no basis.

But don't let that stop you, LOL

 

[dafydd]

Theo's death unveiled the hidden design, everything that has followed on this pattern has been lessened in impact and the expectations have been posted here several times. haven't you noticed? you should have

So you can't predict anything.We already knew that.

 

[Wolrab]

the specific underlying design has been discussed here several times here Wolrab. Do I really have to find the posts for you or do you think you can manage yourself?

After all this time, you can't spout the equations used? Just post whatever calculations you are using at the moment because there is no way I'm wading through this ridiculous thread to find out you do it all by "feelings".

 

[Hans]

After all this time, you can't spout the equations used? Just post whatever calculations you are using at the moment because there is no way I'm wading through this ridiculous thread to find out you do it all by "feelings".

I'll translate that for you. What Dutch means is that he has no criteria, no parameters, no objectives, no way to falsify or confirm 'HHD' because he just makes it up.....

You would think Dutch would have after all these years have URLs to link to or ready made comment/discriptions to cut and paste....but no.

He use to send people to his website but that was found to less than helpful....good luck but to be honest he has NEVER explained this to anyone who could understand it in the way he wants you too.

The most common reaction to his explanations are:

What?
WTFFIT?
Huh?
You're crazy
WTF?
(face palm)

And with that I must say adieu. I'll check back in a few weeks/months and it will be as I had never left because this thread will continue forever. It will be inherited by our heirs-the poor bastards

 

[Daylightstar]

Do you mean the website he posted here?:
http://www.stargatezero.com/forum/index.php?action=printpage;topic=53.0

Title: Re: Indications of Multi Dimensional Design
Post by: Dutch on June 21, 2006, 04:18:33 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

new homepage with focus and anticipations on current timeframes:

Hyper Dimensional Design (http://home.hetnet.nl/~marcel.en.hanneke.van.oostwaard/)

It now redirects you to http://home.kpn.nl/marcel.en.hanneke.van.oostwaard and is a harmless page on dogs.

 

[The Man]

I use the tetrahedronal based geometry. It has been obvious from day 1 on. don't blame me on this one, it should have been clear to you because it has been explained repeatedly. Do your research I would say

It is clear to me, but still evidently not to you. As you do not use a three dimensional pyramidal solid you specifically do not use tetrahedron based geometry, but you evidently just like using the word tetrahedron. Blame yourself and "do your research I would say".

we are not at the same level of thought here apparently. try to be Michio Kaku's carp that jumps out of the pool.

Evidently you aren’t even at the “same level of thought” that includes a tetrahedron.

Try not to be the carp that jumps out of the pool and into the frying pan.

Oops, too late.

There has never been any 3D shape is the deometrical correlations that have been given when it comes to hyper dimensional platonic solids

you are stuck

Nope, you are stuck (to that frying pan) without “platonic solids”.


Why is it that you seem not to link or attribute my quotes?

 

[The Man]

I skipped your previous post because it was split in sentences.

Too bad.

Could you please explain to me that an asteroid impact on Jupiter is something else than it represents?

Not sure what you are asking, an “asteroid impact on Jupiter” certainly represents “an asteroid impact on Jupiter”, other than that you would have to be more specific.

 

[The Man]

I really want to give a proper reply, but its getting late and i have promissed my 2 daughters to take them to the annual village happening here tomorrow

It could take some days or maybe sunday evening, I'm off now

Once again, I can hardly wait.


Tough I hope everyone enjoyed themselves at the “annual village happening”.

 

[Dutch]

So what has changed from when you were young and as you put it thought you "knew it all" and mistakenly thought you “had a very skeptical mind” as you evidently still just “don't have a single doubt” about what you are doing? Is it just that you make yourself feel happy about not having “a single doubt” now?

What has changed is that in the past, I didn't accept the possibility that a concept like HDDesign and all its implications could be valid. All the 'coincidences' and synchronicities made me change my mind. I had to accept it, I couldn't deny these possibilities anymore. The indications where overwhelming so I had to change my rigid perspective.

 

[Dutch]

The Man:

What did you “read about Hyper Dimensional Physics back in 2003”? What makes you think you are applying “Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time”?

Hoaglands material indeed, but also Wilcock and articles from Russian scientists etc. Appliying these HD Physics elements on our perception of time is what I do, not what I think. You may call it otherwise, that's fine with me

Well thank you for more accurately addressing my question. I can understand how one might not be happy with their understanding of reality, but just pretending you’re applying “Hyper Dimensional Physics on our perception of time”, while it might make you happier, it certainly does not demonstrate that your “understanding of reality” has improved at all. So the 9/11 and Madrid bombing “coindedences and synchronicities” were your first?

The first thing that showed up when I firts applied this HD Tertrahedron yes. You might think my "underdstanding of reality" hasn't improved at all, but you will understand that I think exactly the opposite.

When you were young you thought you knew it all and thought you had a skeptical mind. Unfortunately thinking you know it all shows that you in fact don’t have a skeptical mind. Then you began to “trust” you intuition, which was already wrong in making you think you knew it all and had a skeptical mind. Later you claim you began reading about “Hyper Dimensional Physics” which I suspect from your claims on this tread, had very little actually to do with Hyper Dimensional Physics. So you have come up with this HDD nonsense to help you “confirm” you intuition, that you were not happy with before and that had already failed you by getting you to think you knew it all and had a skeptical mind?

Its the application of this HDD 'nonsense' ( as you call it)that unleashed these 'coincidences' and synchronicities. I couldn't ingnore that.

Don’t you see Dutch, instead of moving away from what you were not happy with and had failed you when you were young, your intuition. You have simply come to rely on it fully and have invented a means to simply help you confirm it for yourself. So instead of actually improving your understanding of our reality you have simply chosen to make yourself happy with your own intuition, in spite of the fact that it fails you now as it did when you were young.

NO the Man, the continued 'confirmations' in the material are showing that I'm on the right track, you are just denying it over and over again. I think that's rather stupid, because you have to face it sooner or later. You can't rationalize it away because it won't go away. Its true and I wiil continue to show you the indications.

 

[Dutch]

Dutch, if you read about HD physics back in 2003, my guess is it had to do with Hoagland, as he was the only person who was actually "studying" and writing about such things back then. Lots of other people have taken up his meme (with their own spin of course), but the original "idea" (complete with tetrahedron goodness) was basically his. Which is another way of saying it's basically nonsense.


Hoagie dresses up his stuff in pseudo-scientific babble, you don't even try that. Since you have failed to even try to tell us mere mortals what you are really doing, my guess is you don't know either. You are either really delusional and believe this stuff, or you are really just putting us on. If it's the former, I feel sorry for you. If it's the later, ok you got me, feel better now? In either case, have a nice life.

neither

 

[Dutch]

A big ditto with a cherry on top to what Daylightstar has said

As to the difference between the Dutch of 2010 versus the Dutch of 2006 is that you seemed to actually believe what you were trying to 'sell'....but now having not 'sold' it to anyone - you are just going through the motions.

You seem to blame everyone for their failure to understand while discounting the posibility that you are just wrong

I think your own self-delusions are being drowned in second thoughts and the bitter disappointment that your ideas in fact have no basis.

But don't let that stop you, LOL

You can say what you want, but ignoring these numerous 'confirmations' is rather stupid. So since you guys refuse to find out this for yourselves by posting your own random based expectations so you can compare it with HDDesign, I just continue to share the indications. I guarantee you that you will finally be convinced, that's inevitable.

 

[Dutch]

So you can't predict anything.We already knew that.

Since its not about exact predictions....Why are you keep on saying that? short memory?